ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Ron Parker coming back? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291311)

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:17 AM

Ron Parker coming back?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Ron Parker says in text message he plans to sign with Kansas City. <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor">@TerezPaylor</a></p>&mdash; Stephen Fastenau (@IPBG_Stephen) <a href="https://twitter.com/IPBG_Stephen/status/576790610486636544">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>I can confirm the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> will sign Ron Parker. Agent Justin Turner tells me the deal is worth $30 million in total money over five years.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/576794209111400448">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Ron Parker’s deal includes $8M guaranteed ($5M SB) and $5M in playing time incentives tied to playoff appearances and interceptions.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/576823368474869761">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The deal for Ron Parker with the Chiefs is the largest ever for an un-drafted safety according to <a href="https://twitter.com/NFLAgents_net">@NFLAgents_net</a></p>&mdash; Jason La Canfora (@JasonLaCanfora) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/576824647007805440">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:18 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>I can confirm the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> will sign Ron Parker. Agent Justin Turner tells me the deal is worth $30 million in total money over five years.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/576794209111400448">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BigRock 03-14-2015 11:19 AM

Clark's wallet is just showing off now.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-14-2015 11:19 AM

Need to cut booger.

In58men 03-14-2015 11:19 AM

I like it

Bootlegged 03-14-2015 11:21 AM

Way to buzzkill, Ron F Parker. Goddammit

Urc Burry 03-14-2015 11:21 AM

I'm fine with it if he can play at the level he was last year. But strictly at safety. 6 does seem high though

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:21 AM

jesus, how do we have cap space?

big cherry on top of FA

can not wait for the draft

O.city 03-14-2015 11:21 AM

Hopefully not a 6.mil per.

Sure-Oz 03-14-2015 11:23 AM

Wow! Nice Dors! Coming back to play safety or pinch corner

O.city 03-14-2015 11:23 AM

Single high safety I guess

Sure-Oz 03-14-2015 11:23 AM

5 year deal

Eleazar 03-14-2015 11:25 AM

Dorsey has won this free agency, for sure.

Rausch 03-14-2015 11:25 AM

We'll come to regret this one...

O.city 03-14-2015 11:27 AM

I'm not a huge fan of this signing.

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:27 AM

so we're all in this year, right?


no excuses

TRR 03-14-2015 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 11382602)
jesus, how do we have cap space?

big cherry on top of FA

can not wait for the draft

I've been told DJ, Berry and Alex have all restructured their contracts.

Parker was an instant upgrade over Berry. While Parker isn't a great fit as a FT CB, he is a very solid, smart safety who covers TEs very well.

Red Dawg 03-14-2015 11:27 AM

Yeees. This is really good news.

O.city 03-14-2015 11:28 AM

Apparently the league and the chiefs view him alot better at safety than we do

Red Dawg 03-14-2015 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 11382615)
so we're all in this year, right?


no excuses

We have not gone all in. The montain is large but we are getting better but Indy and Buff will be most improved.

Bootlegged 03-14-2015 11:29 AM

Hate, hate, hate, hate this.

DaneMcCloud 03-14-2015 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11382619)
Apparently the league and the chiefs view him alot better at safety than we do

Who is this "we" you speak of?

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-14-2015 11:30 AM

Jesus Christ, that is ****ing horrible.

O.city 03-14-2015 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11382622)
Who is this "we" you speak of?

Just as the overall theme of this thread

Red Dawg 03-14-2015 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bootlegged (Post 11382621)
Hate, hate, hate, hate this.

I see nothing wrong with keeping our defense intact for this season. They played pretty damn good together.

The Franchise 03-14-2015 11:31 AM

5 for $30? **** that.

KCrockaholic 03-14-2015 11:33 AM

They better hope he improves. Jesus.

Bootlegged 03-14-2015 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 11382630)
I see nothing wrong with keeping our defense intact for this season. They played pretty damn good together.

He cannot cover. At all. I just cannot believe they re-signed him. Horrible.

O.city 03-14-2015 11:34 AM

Have to wait and see the structure first

The Franchise 03-14-2015 11:35 AM

That shit better not have a bunch of guaranteed money.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:35 AM

Supply and demand is why he got 30m.

Bufkin 03-14-2015 11:37 AM

Hopefully Ron Parker bought this Chiefs a nice seafood dinner before he ****ed them so hard.

Sure-Oz 03-14-2015 11:37 AM

@nfldraftscout: 5 years, $30 million for Ron Parker is about paying for the future and not the past. I like it.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-14-2015 11:38 AM

Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

DaFace 03-14-2015 11:38 AM

Dorsey apparently has figured out how to work the cap this year. I didn't figure we'd be active in free agency at all, but we're moving stuff all over the place. I've got to give him credit for that, though I'm not sure about this signing in particular.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

I will take what Dorsey did.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2015 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 11382594)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>I can confirm the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash">#Chiefs</a> will sign Ron Parker. Agent Justin Turner tells me the deal is worth $30 million in total money over five years.</p>&mdash; Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/576794209111400448">March 14, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:banghead:

O.city 03-14-2015 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

Those players arent seeing all that money anyway

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 11382620)
We have not gone all in. The montain is large but we are getting better but Indy and Buff will be most improved.

what do other teams have to do with us going all in?

they've addressed every weakness prior to the draft, laid out quite a bit of money in FA, and now have free reign and 10 picks to address only relative weaknesses at ILB, RT, and WR


based on their spending, it seems to me they think this is the year

MIAdragon 03-14-2015 11:40 AM

He ****ing sucks, not a fan.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:41 AM

Let's wait to see the structure of the contract before we judge. Mauga is really a 1-year deal just like Fanaika.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-14-2015 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 11382654)
I will take what Dorsey did.

Then you're a ****ing idiot.

FringeNC 03-14-2015 11:41 AM

Evidently, Bob Sutton must love the guy.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2015 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 11382641)
Stupidity is why he got 30m.

FYP

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

grubbs is a 2 year deal, he can easily be cut in 2017

mauga is a backloaded deal, he got 2 mill guaranteed
fainaka is basically the same

none of these contracts will cause us any long term problems...i bet Parkers 'real' money looks nothing like 30 mill

DJ's left nut 03-14-2015 11:43 AM

Structure, people.

Structure, structure, structure, structure. Calm down before your flip your shit because the structure will determine absolutely everything about this deal.

In the end I think we'll probably be a little annoyed by the deal, but not $6 mil/per annoyed.

He's a guy that credibly plays single-high safety and there just aren't a lot of those to be found. A TON of our success on deep balls last year came from his ability to really blanket deep. Additionally, with a healthy Branch, Abdullah could play nickle safety like he did a couple years back and you suddenly have a pretty nice coverage package and credible run defense with Branch/Abdullah being well above average for SS and NCB respectively and Parker being merely average in run defense for a FS.

This gives Sutton a TON of looks he can employ. Parker's a very nice fit for what we would try to do.

Wait until the structure trickles out before you lose your shit. If we end up paying him $12 million over the first 3, it's a solid deal, $15 million and it's a mild overpay but nothing brutal. Beyond that and I think we got hosed. Hosed or not hosed though, he's a good fit here.

Discuss Thrower 03-14-2015 11:43 AM

Can't see how this isn't overpaying.

bigjosh 03-14-2015 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

2 of those players are on 1 year deals, of course the total money is lower. Jfc, we resigned some players that are decent to manageable deals. Grubbs cap hit is less after the extension for ****s sake.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

Mauga is really a 1-year deal just like Fanaika each 2.5m. Terrance Knighton got 4m for 1 year. 5th means nothing with all the comp picks the Chiefs will get.

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 11382670)
Can't see how this isn't overpaying.

as we don't know the details yet, how can you see anything?

DaneMcCloud 03-14-2015 11:45 AM

It's probably more like a 2 year, $11 million dollar deal and not a 5 year, $30 million dollars deal.

Relax, people.

DJ's left nut 03-14-2015 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11382659)
Those players are seeing all that money anyway

Obviously.

Everyone knows that NFL contract are iron-clad.

We should totally flip our shit over AAV...because that definitely means a lot.

O.city 03-14-2015 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 11382674)
as we don't know the details yet, how can you see anything?

See what you wanna see

O.city 03-14-2015 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11382676)
Obviously.

Everyone knows that NFL contract are iron-clad.

We should totally flip our shit over AAV...because that definitely means a lot.

My phone corrected aren't to are, which as I can see now completely changes the forecast of said post

Bootlegged 03-14-2015 11:46 AM

Cannot cover. Don't care if he paid Chiefs to play.

Red Dawg 03-14-2015 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

We don't need Fairley or Knighton so who cares. Dorsey is doing is doing pretty well of making this team better so far.

The Franchise 03-14-2015 11:46 AM

My question is who restructured their deal because we had dick for cap room.

Easy 6 03-14-2015 11:46 AM

Pleased to hear this... didnt care for his asking price, but still didnt wanna lose him, its entirely possible his ceiling hasnt been reached yet.

A good young player to keep around, greasy fast for a safety.

DaneMcCloud 03-14-2015 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382650)
Seriously:

Grubbs, Mauga, Parker, Paul Fanaika

($70 million total in contracts)

or

Hudson, Akeem Ayers, Nick Fairley, Terrance Knighton, and a fifth round pick

($57 million in contracts)


The trade for Grubbs on its own was a good move. The extension is ill-guided. The Branch signing is a great risk-reward move, and I really like bringing in Maclin. Aside from that, Dorsey has stacked up some outright reckless and/or boneheaded signings.

Ron Parker plays well for a month and gets $30 ****ing million, but Hudson is told to kick rocks with no depth on our interior OL? Fanaika and Mauga are vet minimum players. There is no rationale for giving them $16 million in contracts.

Ask any Titans fan about Ayers and they'll tell you he sucks.

He got lucky with half a season in New England and cashed out.

And $9 million for a center is the definition of stupidity.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11382681)
My question is who restructured their deal because we had dick for cap room.

I'm thinking they worked something out with Berry.

ILChief 03-14-2015 11:47 AM

This says they don't plan on Berry coming back

Hootie 03-14-2015 11:48 AM

did we really just give this guy $6M a year?! Good Lord. Well, can't win 'em all, I guess LMAO

RunKC 03-14-2015 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11382675)
It's probably more like a 2 year, $11 million dollar deal and not a 5 year, $30 million dollars deal.

Relax, people.

I bet this is backloaded and he won't see that money..

O.city 03-14-2015 11:49 AM

In terms of ayers, like many players, it's more about scheme and fit.

If parker fits here like they think, overpaying a bit isn't a big deal

DJ's left nut 03-14-2015 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 11382663)
Then you're a ****ing idiot.

Nah, he's just not a militantly ignorant goddamn whiner.

You have no idea, none whatsoever, how this contract is structured and you're still sitting here bleeding out.

Then again, you're just going to bitch regardless so I guess there's no harm in staking your position before you're aware of the substance.

You've gone full ****ing Clay. Bitching about $70 million in contracts to guys you know will see maybe 1/2 of that is just wailing for the sake of wailing.

Jim Lahey 03-14-2015 11:49 AM

I'm fine with this. He's a solid player at single high. Terrible corner, but solid safety.

There was a huge market for Parker and McCourtey this year because single high safeties are hard to find and this safety draft class is bad.

ILChief 03-14-2015 11:49 AM

Glad parker is back though. Good safety that can help out at corner is valuable.

Mr. Laz 03-14-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11382675)
It's probably more like a 2 year, $11 million dollar deal and not a 5 year, $30 million dollars deal.

Relax, people.

5/6 million for 2 years is still too much!!

I sure as hell hope so but there will a number of guys who can do what Parker did for us in the 2nd-5th round of the draft for a fraction of that price.

What is the deal with Dorsey paying a bunch of money to Jags?

pay the impact guys, draft the jags for cheap

:doh!:

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-14-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11382669)
Structure, people.

Structure, structure, structure, structure. Calm down before your flip your shit because the structure will determine absolutely everything about this deal.

In the end I think we'll probably be a little annoyed by the deal, but not $6 mil/per annoyed.

He's a guy that credibly plays single-high safety and there just aren't a lot of those to be found. A TON of our success on deep balls last year came from his ability to really blanket deep. Additionally, with a healthy Branch, Abdullah could play nickle safety like he did a couple years back and you suddenly have a pretty nice coverage package and credible run defense with Branch/Abdullah being well above average for SS and NCB respectively and Parker being merely average in run defense for a FS.

This gives Sutton a TON of looks he can employ. Parker's a very nice fit for what we would try to do.

Wait until the structure trickles out before you lose your shit. If we end up paying him $12 million over the first 3, it's a solid deal, $15 million and it's a mild overpay but nothing brutal. Beyond that and I think we got hosed. Hosed or not hosed though, he's a good fit here.

You are greatly overrating Parker's coverage ability as a single high safety. He did not "blanket" deep. That is extremely hyperbolic. Most of our secondary's success came from the constant terror inflicted on QBs by the front seven.

There were several players at in-demand positions out there who were younger with longer track records of success who got less money than this.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-14-2015 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11382690)
Nah, he's just not a militantly ignorant goddamn whiner.

You have no idea, none whatsoever, how this contract is structured and you're still sitting here bleeding out.

Then again, you're just going to bitch regardless so I guess there's no harm in staking your position before you're aware of the substance.

You've gone full ****ing Clay. Bitching about $70 million in contracts to guys you know will see maybe 1/2 of that is just wailing for the sake of wailing.

Thanks, DJ well said.

the Talking Can 03-14-2015 11:51 AM

did anyone really want us to give hudson 9mill a year?

Mr. Laz 03-14-2015 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11382689)
In terms of ayers, like many players, it's more about scheme and fit.

If parker fits here like they think, overpaying a bit isn't a big deal

overpaying is always a big deal

DJ's left nut 03-14-2015 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11382675)
It's probably more like a 2 year, $11 million dollar deal and not a 5 year, $30 million dollars deal.

Relax, people.

They probably don't give him 5 years if they didn't chip in a fairly substantial signing bonus that they're looking to spread. If that's the case, they probably won't be eager to accelerate it into year 2.

I'd imagine we're looking at what will amount to a 3-year deal.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-14-2015 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11382683)
Ask any Titans fan about Ayers and they'll tell you he sucks.

He got lucky with half a season in New England and cashed out.

And $9 million for a center is the definition of stupidity.

He got 2/6 from the Rams.

Parker played well here for half a season and will likely see 2-3 times that in guaranteed money.

Do you not see the irony in your argument?

Hootie 03-14-2015 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11382681)
My question is who restructured their deal because we had dick for cap room.

the salary cap is a myth ... every year you just leverage towards the next year or the next two years ... rinse, wash, repeat

Clark is spending a lot of up front money and people are still mad. Go figure.

O.city 03-14-2015 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11382697)
overpaying is always a big deal

if you get production, it's not

Iconic 03-14-2015 11:53 AM

I pray to god he's never put in a situation that requires he play corner.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 03-14-2015 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 11382667)
grubbs is a 2 year deal, he can easily be cut in 2017

mauga is a backloaded deal, he got 2 mill guaranteed
fainaka is basically the same

none of these contracts will cause us any long term problems...i bet Parkers 'real' money looks nothing like 30 mill

Hamas is usually the one to point out things like this. I think he's just looking to bitch at Dorsey. Like Ayers would ever sign for 2 yr/6 million here. Please.

RINGLEADER 03-14-2015 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11382612)
We'll come to regret this one...

If he plays like he did in 2014 (as safety and back-up CB) then I disagree. There's very little evidence that he will though.

Still think it is a good move if the deal doesn't kill us after the second year (saying this having not read the entire thread).

Our secondary is set now for 2015 though. Need to extend Sean Smith or draft his replacement.

Jim Lahey 03-14-2015 11:54 AM

"CLARK YOU CHEAP BASTARD!!!"

1 week later

"OMG QUIT SPENDING ALL OUR ****ING MONEY!!!"


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.