ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football NFL to look into -Taunting to Nullify Touchdowns (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278143)

Lprechaun 10-31-2013 10:38 AM

NFL to look into -Taunting to Nullify Touchdowns
 
This would piss a few people off
http://msn.foxsports.com/lacesout/nf...ing-penalties/

Dayze 10-31-2013 10:39 AM

JFC.
yay! another subjective penalty/call.

Bump 10-31-2013 10:40 AM

That would be the dumbest thing ever. A taunt after a score has no effect on whether or not that player would have scored or not, like holding or something would. Just ****ing fine them, but negating the score would be absolutely bullshit.

Snapplez 10-31-2013 10:40 AM

Can't let anyones feelings get hurt. We should do away with the MVP award too, so the shitty players don't feel less valuable.

BigMeatballDave 10-31-2013 10:40 AM

Tate should have had his TD taken away.

Graystoke 10-31-2013 10:42 AM

Bad idea.

BigMeatballDave 10-31-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 10143696)
That would be the dumbest thing ever. A taunt after a score has no effect on whether or not that player would have scored or not, like holding or something would. Just ****ing fine them, but negating the score would be absolutely bullshit.

Taunting BEFORE a score should be penalized.

DaFace 10-31-2013 10:43 AM

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Y_ODcECzxG...l-scott-no.gif

Lprechaun 10-31-2013 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10143698)
Tate should have had his TD taken away.

Why? Since when does being better and clearly scoring regardless of taunting mean you should get the score. Sorry but thats just the stupid mentality of the "everyone is a winner, fat kids are people too" crap.

lcarus 10-31-2013 10:43 AM

I think taunting should be mandatory or the TD doesn't count. How's that for a slice of fried gold?!

Dayze 10-31-2013 10:43 AM

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/99oUo9Moeq4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

TEX 10-31-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Graystoke (Post 10143704)
Bad idea.

Agreed.
I'd like to see them have to kick off from like the 5-yard line or something...

TripleThreat 10-31-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snapplez (Post 10143697)
Can't let anyones feelings get hurt. We should do away with the MVP award too, so the shitty players don't feel less valuable.

+1 lmao

Lprechaun 10-31-2013 10:44 AM

If this happens you will see someone using a high step as a double clutch sort of move and be called for taunting because Dion did it.

RealSNR 10-31-2013 10:45 AM

I predict that there actually is a certain threshold to these rule changes such that people stop watching football en masse.

hometeam 10-31-2013 10:47 AM

Awww.. did a wittle babay get dey wittle feelers huwwwt?

Grown men can handle it. Everyone does not deserve a ribbon. This is life. Move on.

BlackHelicopters 10-31-2013 10:49 AM

Will never happen. Roger Goodell is not this stupid...

Skyy God 10-31-2013 10:50 AM

Hell naw. Bring bad team endzone celebrations while they're at it.

Rain Man 10-31-2013 10:50 AM

That's a dumb idea.

Taunting should be a penalty, enforced by letting the taunted player(s) hit and kick the penalized player for 30 seconds, and then maybe 5 yards.

ArrowheadHawk 10-31-2013 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 10143696)
That would be the dumbest thing ever. A taunt after a score has no effect on whether or not that player would have scored or not, like holding or something would. Just ****ing fine them, but negating the score would be absolutely bullshit.

It's not a penalty for taunting AFTER the score. You are allowed to celebrate after the play is over. No need to do it during the play.

Dayze 10-31-2013 10:51 AM

suspend him for a quarter or half. lol

kcchiefsus 10-31-2013 10:54 AM

A little off subject, but why is it Seattle is so full of these arrogant pricks who can't seem to act like they've been there before? Golden Tate, Richard Sherman, somebody needs to go Stevie Johnson vs. Eric Berry on these guys.

chiefzilla1501 10-31-2013 10:55 AM

Son of a bitch.

If they want to enforce this horribly stupid rule and show they're serious, then assess after the kick return. Even that is beyond stupid.

Prison Bitch 10-31-2013 10:57 AM

I personally like taunting, I think it's funny as hell. And hurts far less than getting your knee blown out by Stevie Johnson who was neither penalized nor fined.

scho63 10-31-2013 10:57 AM

KILL GOODELL NOW!!!!

WhawhaWhat 10-31-2013 10:57 AM

Old white guys don't like all that loudness. The taunting was awesome and they should bring back the TD celebrations as well.

Lprechaun 10-31-2013 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 10143739)
Son of a bitch.

If they want to enforce this horribly stupid rule and show they're serious, then assess after the kick return. Even that is beyond stupid.

Umm, they already do

loochy 10-31-2013 11:01 AM

Dude wtf? If you allow a touchdown then you DESERVE to be taunted

Strongside 10-31-2013 11:03 AM

I don't think they should nullify TD's if the taunt occurs after the score...however....when Golden Tate was running down the sideline waving his hands around at the defender like some kind of bundle of sticks, I was hoping that they would take the score away. No place for that shit in the game.

chiefzilla1501 10-31-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 10143745)
Umm, they already do

Right now it is assessed before the kickoff. I think that's fine but in most cases, it doesn't feel like a real penalty especially given how close the kickoff is now.

Rain Man 10-31-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10143752)
I don't think they should nullify TD's if the taunt occurs after the score...however....when Golden Tate was running down the sideline waving his hands around at the defender like some kind of pillowbitergot, I was hoping that they would take the score away. No place for that shit in the game.

Yeah, he was an idiot. I was hoping he'd get beaned with a battery or something. A car battery.

Seattle does seems to have some real jerks on that team. They've got the opportunity to be a popular team, but they're blowing it.

MTG#10 10-31-2013 11:10 AM

I hope Goodell gets A.I.D.S.

Fire Me Boy! 10-31-2013 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10143752)
I don't think they should nullify TD's if the taunt occurs after the score...however....when Golden Tate was running down the sideline waving his hands around at the defender like some kind of pillowbiter, I was hoping that they would take the score away. No place for that shit in the game.

I didn't see this. Video?

EDIT: Nevermind. I hadn't viewed the story yet, GIF in there of Tate's run.

Strongside 10-31-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 10143775)
I didn't see this. Video?

http://s3.amazonaws.com/br-cdn/temp_...2819_49_24.gif

Funny thing is he almost stepped out like a dumbass. Hate that dude.

That team has taken on the identity of it's coach...a snobby, cocky asshole. Granted, he gave Tate a good talking to about the taunt, but still.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 10-31-2013 11:14 AM

If we can not vent our build up, of the week's frustrations on players with pus filled egos. What good is a football game?

**** YOU GOLDEN TATE YOU PUKE STAIN ON HUMANITY

There. The world is now a better place.

Fire Me Boy! 10-31-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10143778)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/br-cdn/temp_...2819_49_24.gif

Funny thing is he almost stepped out like a dumbass. Hate that dude.

That team has taken on the identity of it's coach...a snobby, cocky asshole. Granted, he gave Tate a good talking to about the taunt, but still.

http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/8783/sjre.jpg

POND_OF_RED 10-31-2013 11:16 AM

This league should have merged with the XFL when they had a chance

Frosty 10-31-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 10143772)
Yeah, he was an idiot. I was hoping he'd get beaned with a battery or something. A car battery.

Seattle does seems to have some real jerks on that team. They've got the opportunity to be a popular team, but they're blowing it.

Tate really the only obnoxious one. Sherman talks a lot but he's a good guy who will also give props to the opposing player if they get a good play on him (Fitz' blind side block on him a couple of weeks ago or Roddy White burning him for a long TD in the playoffs last year).

J Diddy 10-31-2013 11:22 AM

I have a better idea: If a player taunts a team and scores then all fans of the taunted team get a free beer provided it is before the 3rd quarter. If it is after alcohol cut off they get free nachos and a gift certificate for a free beer at a later date.

Frazod 10-31-2013 11:25 AM

http://sercanaltun.com/wp-content/up...Cff1raj8mk.gif

Strongside 10-31-2013 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 10143787)

They really should change 'reputation' to 'good lovin' in that popup.

KC_Lee 10-31-2013 11:26 AM

The NFL should do what the NHL does and put players into a penalty box. Holding you get put in the box for 3 downs. Taunting your out for 10 downs.

Strongside 10-31-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 10143810)
The NFL should do what the NHL does and put players into a penalty box. Holding you get put in the box for 3 downs. Taunting your out for 10 downs.

Or just put a man on the sideline...So it's 10 on 11. lol. The NFL Power Play.

lcarus 10-31-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10143809)
They really should change 'reputation' to 'good lovin' in that popup.

Truer words have never been spoken!

Frazod 10-31-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 10143810)
The NFL should do what the NHL does and put players into a penalty box. Holding you get put in the box for 3 downs. Taunting your out for 10 downs.

That could be interesting if they don't let them replace the offender.

11 on 10 defensively? That would suck. Or, in the case of our offense, level the playing field. :D

Strongside 10-31-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 10143814)
That could be interesting if they don't let them replace the offender.

11 on 10 defensively? That would suck. Or, in the case of our offense, level the playing field. :D

That would be interesting...if you're forced to take one player out...who would it be on either side of the ball?

Probably a safety on Defense? Maybe FB on offense? A WR?

Eleazar 10-31-2013 11:33 AM

I dont have a problem with this if it's like the college taunting rule.

Sorter 10-31-2013 11:35 AM

Can't allow taunting. It might fracture some fragile egos and set a bad example for society.

oh_snap 10-31-2013 11:41 AM

When did the league become so politically correct? IF there is one thing I hate, its mixing one of my favorite past times (watching football) with politics.

Are we afraid of hurting peoples feelings? Its football for christ sakes! Who cares if people get their feelings hurt! Just wait guys, eventually they'll start calling for home crowds to be quite because it gives the home team an unfair advantage. Its coming!

NinerDoug 10-31-2013 11:43 AM

That would be really stupid.

gblowfish 10-31-2013 11:43 AM

I think the game might be more entertaining if taunting was REQUIRED upon scoring a touchdown. Things such as slapping the opposing coach's mama in the stands; urinating on the football, simulating sex with the goalpoast, or team twerking.

Just my humble suggestions to improve the watchability of America's sport....

big nasty kcnut 10-31-2013 11:43 AM

It's the pinstripe bowl all over again.

KC_Lee 10-31-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 10143814)
That could be interesting if they don't let them replace the offender.

11 on 10 defensively? That would suck. Or, in the case of our offense, level the playing field. :D

Take the offending player off the field but the team can sub another player in.

For example, B. Albert gets called for holding, he's in the box of a set number of downs. Now KC has to figure out who is playing LT.

So you now have a lesser talent at a position that the opossing team, in theory, exploit.

Thoughts?

Rausch 10-31-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 10143696)
That would be the dumbest thing ever. A taunt after a score has no effect on whether or not that player would have scored or not, like holding or something would. Just ****ing fine them, but negating the score would be absolutely bullshit.

This.

Taunting IS why we play sport...

Frosty 10-31-2013 11:45 AM

I think the only people getting their feelings hurt are the fans. I doubt the players care much.

WhawhaWhat 10-31-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 10143860)
I think the only people getting their feelings hurt are the fans. I doubt the players care much.

Won't somebody please think about the children?!?!

Frazod 10-31-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 10143856)
Take the offending player off the field but the team can sub another player in.

For example, B. Albert gets called for holding, he's in the box of a set number of downs. Now KC has to figure out who is playing LT.

So you now have a lesser talent at a position that the opossing team, in theory, exploit.

Thoughts?

Or just try to play without a LT. :evil:

CaliforniaChief 10-31-2013 11:53 AM

Bad over-reaction. The most I would go for is an ejection and a 15-yard penalty from the end of the kickoff. In other words, 15 yards back from where the kickoff return ends.

But Golden Taint should be kicked in the face for that act of dumbassery.

listopencil 10-31-2013 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 10143856)
Take the offending player off the field but the team can sub another player in.

For example, B. Albert gets called for holding, he's in the box of a set number of downs. Now KC has to figure out who is playing LT.

So you now have a lesser talent at a position that the opossing team, in theory, exploit.

Thoughts?


It would be a fun idea if there weren't so many shitty calls made.

J Diddy 10-31-2013 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTG#10 (Post 10143774)
I hope Goodell gets A.I.D.S.

I was kind of hoping Poe rubbed some on his lips before he put the kiss on.

KC_Lee 10-31-2013 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10143877)
It would be a fun idea if there weren't so many shitty calls made.

True, true.

a pp roach 10-31-2013 12:02 PM

i like the hockey idea for serious fouls like hits to the head and fights. makes it more of a team game, it would seem, though i've never put on a set of pads it my life.

this celebration thing...wtf that makes the game twice as enjoyable.

Fire Me Boy! 10-31-2013 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 10143809)
They really should change 'reputation' to 'good lovin' in that popup.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 10143812)
Truer words have never been spoken!

So let it be written...

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/4880577/pharoah-o.gif

ToxSocks 10-31-2013 12:06 PM

GAAAAAAY.

We are men. We are competitive. We taunt each other, we've been doing it since grade school. It's a ****ing sport. Get over it, no one cares about taunting.

ct 10-31-2013 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10143698)
Tate should have had his TD taken away.

No, Tate should get his bell rung by the next defender within a kill shot. But that is already deemed illegal.

Dartgod 10-31-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 10143852)
I think the game might be more entertaining if taunting was REQUIRED upon scoring a touchdown. Things such as slapping the opposing coach's mama in the stands; urinating on the football, simulating sex with the goalpoast, or team twerking.

Just my humble suggestions to improve the watchability of America's sport....

Bennie Thompson approves of this post.

http://smileyshack.files.wordpress.c....gif?w=63&h=53

ToxSocks 10-31-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 10143895)
No, Tate should get his bell rung by the next defender within a kill shot. But that is already deemed illegal.

This.

I really don't give two shits about taunting. It fuels rivalries and adds emotion to the game. Nothing better than to see a taunting Bronco get laid the **** out by a Chief.

Predarat 10-31-2013 12:12 PM

They could tack on double penalties. I do not believe in taking scores away but a double unsportsmanlike penalty could wake them up a bit. Enforce it after the kickoff. 15 yards, everybody looks around and says huh, what? 30+ yards, we have a panic on our hands on the other teams next possession.

TomBarndtsTwin 10-31-2013 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 10143895)
No, Tate should get his bell rung by the next defender within a kill shot. But that is already deemed illegal.

Exactly.

The only reason Golden Taint demonstrated that non sense was he KNEW that no one could retaliate on him later on or they would get fined or suspended.

In the old days, you would NEVER see a player do something like that because they would end up on a stretcher before the end of the game . . .

Ace Gunner 10-31-2013 12:15 PM

just give them blacks twenty lashes

vailpass 10-31-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10143698)
Tate should have had his TD taken away.

no but he should have been punched in the throat...

HemiEd 10-31-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 10143708)

Yeah, they are just going to keep ****ing with game until they ruin it. The QBs should already have to wear skirts.

TomBarndtsTwin 10-31-2013 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace Gunner (Post 10143913)
just give them blacks twenty lashes

Really?

What does race have to do with this??

So you believe the majority of NFL fans would have been fine with this act if it was, say, Rob Gronkowski doing it?

J Diddy 10-31-2013 12:31 PM

**** Goodell. He doesn't seem to understand that this is a show. The players are nothing but dancing monkeys who are paid a shit load to entertain. A shit load that is handed over by the fans or by the networks because the fans watch and then they can make money off the fans.

It is one thing when it comes to safety and I understand that; however, if your goal is to remove the entertainment value out of the game then it will soon be hitting the shitter.

Nightfyre 10-31-2013 12:38 PM

If you want to punish taunting or excessive celebration, start handing out quarter-long suspensions and dock a quarter of a week's pay. That ought to get the player's attention.

Rausch 10-31-2013 12:43 PM

If you can't taunt why compete?...

notorious 10-31-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10143706)
Taunting BEFORE a score should be penalized.

This.

And it's exactly what they are going to do.

ThaVirus 10-31-2013 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace Gunner (Post 10143913)
just give them blacks twenty lashes

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 10143941)
this is a show. The players are nothing but dancing monkeys

Reported for racism.

InChiefsHeaven 10-31-2013 12:53 PM

Didn't they throw a flag on Tate? I thought they did...

J Diddy 10-31-2013 12:58 PM

Ray Lewis once had a beautiful quote concerning Chad Ocho Cinco's mocking of his dance. To paraphrase he said, " if you don't want to see that dance, keep them out of the endzone."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.