ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Should the Chiefs have drafted Aaron Rodgers over Derrick Johnson? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=188932)

Deberg_1990 08-11-2008 08:00 PM

Should the Chiefs have drafted Aaron Rodgers over Derrick Johnson?
 
Would we have been in a better position now???

Rodgers would have gotten to learn from Trent Green a few years....

Hmmmm....thoughts to ponder.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_NFL_Draft

LiL stumppy 08-11-2008 08:02 PM

Not really because at the time we were a decent team and were looking for a few players to make us a good team, and we obviously needed help on D. Could go either way really.

Mecca 08-11-2008 08:03 PM

Possibly, not looking to the future with the draft hurt our team, we wanted instant gratification and thought we had to take D players...

Of course Vermiel probably would have pissed his depends if he had he was old and had 0 thought about the future of the team.

dorseybowe 08-11-2008 08:05 PM

Johnson had better value when we were drafting. He still does. Rodgers hasn't proved he can play.

Direckshun 08-11-2008 08:05 PM

The 2005 Draft was a flop for just about everybody except a handful of teams.

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 08:07 PM

****, I'm surprised Grandpa didn't trade our first rounder in '05 for an assistant coach. Vermeil can taste my ass, and Carl can have a double taste for his helping hand.

InChiefsHeaven 08-11-2008 08:08 PM

No. We needed defense at the time. DJ was the pick. I would have imploded had they picked Rogers...

alanm 08-11-2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorseybowe (Post 4908503)
Johnson had better value when we were drafting. He still does. Rodgers hasn't proved he can play.

How could you pass up a Butkus Award winner when he falls in your lap.
I can see in a a couple of years we'll probably be having this discussion about Dorsey. :rolleyes:

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 08:10 PM

But, but, doesn't this board go ape shit if someone suggests drafting other than BPA?

Bowser 08-11-2008 08:10 PM

NO. DJ is primed to come into his own this year. I have no problems with him being the pick.

And there is no way Vermeil would have risked getting on Green's bad side by taking a QB in the first.

Mecca 08-11-2008 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell (Post 4908516)
No. We needed defense at the time. DJ was the pick. I would have imploded had they picked Rogers...

You have bad drafts placing need above all...

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 4908520)
And there is no way Vermeil would have risked getting on Green's bad side by taking a QB in the first.

ROFL

He and his son would have made amends during the holiday season.

alanm 08-11-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4908519)
But, but, doesn't this board go ape shit if someone suggests drafting other than BPA?

Johnson was the BPA.

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908526)
Johnson was the BPA.

Wasn't Rogers being considered as the #1 overall pick?

Deberg_1990 08-11-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908526)
Johnson was the BPA.

Unless you think that Linebacker is the next Derrick Thomas, there is no way you can value an outside Linebacker over a potential franchise QB.

Mecca 08-11-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908526)
Johnson was the BPA.

That's actually questionable because of his position, many people feel non pass rushing LB's aren't worth 1st round picks.

So unless it's DeMarcus Ware or Merriman it's not worth it.

Bowser 08-11-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4908527)
Wasn't Rogers being considered as the #1 overall pick?

Heh. You think the Niners might want a do over?

luv 08-11-2008 08:13 PM

I don't think we should ever draft a QB, unless he's just the total package. We can't develop them.

Mecca 08-11-2008 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 4908531)
I don't think we should ever draft a QB, unless he's just the total package. We can't develop them.

We need the #1 pick in the right year then because the last guy to resemble what you described is Carson Palmer.

luv 08-11-2008 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908532)
We need the #1 pick in the right year then because the last guy to resemble what you described is Carson Palmer.

We'll end up with Palmer when he's two years away from retirement.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-11-2008 08:18 PM

DJ has been extremely disappointing, IMO.

Ultra Peanut 08-11-2008 08:21 PM

In retrospect? Perhaps. It's not like Rodgers has proven much yet, though, and DJ was almost impossible to pass on at the time.

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 4908533)
We'll end up with Palmer when he's two years away from retirement.

:clap:

A true fan.

luv 08-11-2008 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4908559)
:clap:

A true fan.

The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

Bowser 08-11-2008 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 4908547)
In retrospect? Perhaps. It's not like Rodgers has proven much yet, though, and DJ was almost impossible to pass on at the time.

Hell, forget the Niners wanting a do over. I can't beieve Millen's head isn't on top of a pike outside of the stadium for taking Mike Williams over Derrick Johnson (or any of the other 200 some that were left).

Skip Towne 08-11-2008 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 4908582)
The definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

Well, you are talking about different head coaches. Just because Marty couldn't doesn't mean later coaches can't.

alanm 08-11-2008 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4908528)
Unless you think that Linebacker is the next Derrick Thomas, there is no way you can value an outside Linebacker over a potential franchise QB.

He fell to us at 15. He wasn't supposed to be there. Just as Dorsey fell to us. Besides we still had a injury free Green at that point.

Mecca 08-11-2008 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908599)
He fell to us at 15. He wasn't supposed to be there. Just as Dorsey fell to us. Besides we still had a injury free Green at that point.

As much as Johnson got knocked before that draft it wasn't surprising he dropped.

alanm 08-11-2008 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908601)
As much as Johnson got knocked before that draft it wasn't surprising he dropped.

We needed linebackers and D in general. How could you pass on the Butkus winner when he falls in your lap?

Mecca 08-11-2008 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908607)
We needed linebackers and D in general. How could you pass on the Butkus winner when he falls in your lap?

Well LB, non pass rushing ones have proven to been a devalued position in the league...

ChiefsCountry 08-11-2008 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908610)
Well LB, non pass rushing ones have proven to been a devalued position in the league...

Johnson was as good as your boy Rivers coming out of college, should Keith Rivers have been a top 10 pick?

Mecca 08-11-2008 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 4908614)
Johnson was as good as your boy Rivers coming out of college, should Keith Rivers have been a top 10 pick?

Good question, and I don't think Johnson was as good as Rivers coming out, Rivers is much more polished and coached than DJ ever was. I think on pure natural talent they're comparable, I think Rivers is alot more ready and coached.

That speaks more to the differences in Pete Carroll and Mack Brown and not the players though.

StcChief 08-11-2008 09:05 PM

should we have draft Dan Marino over Todd Blackledge

time well tell... I like DJ's up side. Aaron Rodgers meh.

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 09:06 PM

Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell no.

alanm 08-11-2008 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908610)
Well LB, non pass rushing ones have proven to been a devalued position in the league...

Gunther has him playing on the wrong side. But since they brought in Williams I guess he's stuck.

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908626)
Gunther has him playing on the wrong side. But since they brought in Williams I guess he's stuck.

Gunther has him playing the CORRECT side. He switched back to his college position this offseason.

ChiefsCountry 08-11-2008 09:20 PM

Trouble with linebackers is their play for right or wrong is how many sacks they get. Its how Pro Bowl is determined and other factors.

Reerun_KC 08-11-2008 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 4908618)
should we have draft Dan Marino over Todd Blackledge

time well tell... I like DJ's up side. Aaron Rodgers meh.

Dammit Carl!

:cuss:

dorseybowe 08-11-2008 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908517)
How could you pass up a Butkus Award winner when he falls in your lap.
I can see in a a couple of years we'll probably be having this discussion about Dorsey. :rolleyes:

Based upon his college play, Dorsey was the easiest pick in Chiefs' draft history.

dorseybowe 08-11-2008 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StcChief (Post 4908618)
should we have draft Dan Marino over Todd Blackledge

time well tell... I like DJ's up side. Aaron Rodgers meh.

Wasn't Marino a crack addict? I wouldn't have jumped on him either.

Mecca 08-11-2008 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 4908646)
Trouble with linebackers is their play for right or wrong is how many sacks they get. Its how Pro Bowl is determined and other factors.

To be a LB like Johnson to make his pick worth it he has to become Keith Bulluck and Bulluck right now is one of the very best OLB's in the league.

Huffman83 08-11-2008 10:06 PM

This year will tell for sure. Especially w/ Rogers getting his shot to play. I'm hoping DJ becomes more of a dominant player. Especially in the 2nd half of games.

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 10:10 PM

Just a reminder that Derrick Johnson DID lead the league in tackles for loss last year. He's not a complete bust. :rolleyes:

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 4908714)
Just a reminder that Derrick Johnson DID lead the league in tackles for loss last year. He's not a complete bust. :rolleyes:

Is he the second best LB in the division?

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4908719)
Is he the second best LB in the division?

I'd say Derrick Johnson is better than any linebacker in Denver. He's not as good as Merriman obviously, but they are different types of players. I'd put him about equal to Thomas Howard in Oakland.

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 4908721)
I'd say Derrick Johnson is better than any linebacker in Denver. He's not as good as Merriman obviously, but they are different types of players. I'd put him about equal to Thomas Howard in Oakland.

KC probably shouldn't release him.

alanm 08-11-2008 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dorseybowe (Post 4908668)
Based upon his college play, Dorsey was the easiest pick in Chiefs' draft history.

Well based upon Johnsons play and after winning the Butkus and Nagurski taking him when he fell to the Chiefs was a no brainer.

dorseybowe 08-11-2008 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 4908726)
Well based upon Johnsons play and after winning the Butkus and Nagurski taking him when he fell to the Chiefs was a no brainer.

No doubt. I couldn't believe that he fell to us on draft day.

Mecca 08-11-2008 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 4908721)
I'd say Derrick Johnson is better than any linebacker in Denver. He's not as good as Merriman obviously, but they are different types of players. I'd put him about equal to Thomas Howard in Oakland.

Thomas Howard who was a 2nd round pick...

Chiefs Pantalones 08-11-2008 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 4908721)
I'd say Derrick Johnson is better than any linebacker in Denver. He's not as good as Merriman obviously, but they are different types of players. I'd put him about equal to Thomas Howard in Oakland.

Howard has made more plays than DJ though.

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 4908748)
Howard has made more plays than DJ though.

In pass coverage. The guy didn't have nearly as many tackles for loss as DJ, and he had one sack.

I doubt he gets six picks every year, either.

Demonpenz 08-11-2008 10:39 PM

it's do or die time for Derrick Johnson, no doubt about that

DeezNutz 08-11-2008 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 4908754)
it's do or die time for Derrick Gordon

FYP.

Demonpenz 08-11-2008 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 4908755)
FYP.

I hope billy hali gets it going too

HolmeZz 08-11-2008 10:50 PM

Thomas Howard is not better than Derrick Johnson. :spock:

Buehler445 08-11-2008 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908692)
To be a LB like Johnson to make his pick worth it he has to become Keith Bulluck and Bulluck right now is one of the very best OLB's in the league.

Why? Rogers hasn't done shit. The one time he comes in for Favre, he breaks his foot. At least Brodie made it through an entire half before getting broken, and you think he is aweful. Come on now.

Hammock Parties 08-11-2008 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolmeZz (Post 4908763)
Thomas Howard is not better than Derrick Johnson. :spock:

I'm sure Raider fans would tell you differently.

Anyway, I really hate the lack of respect for DJ around here. He's a good player. He's not a great player. But people act like he's a disappointment. He's not.

Mecca 08-11-2008 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 4908765)
Why? Rogers hasn't done shit. The one time he comes in for Favre, he breaks his foot. At least Brodie made it through an entire half before getting broken, and you think he is aweful. Come on now.

It's because of the value placed on that position, if you take a devalued position really high he has to be above the general player.

If you take a Guard in the first round he has to be Steve Hutchinson for the pick to be worth it.

HolmeZz 08-11-2008 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 4908769)
I'm sure Raider fans would tell you differently.

That's great.

HolmeZz 08-11-2008 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908773)
It's because of the value placed on that position, if you take a devalued position really high he has to be above the general player.

Again, what's really high? He wasn't taken in the Top 5, he wasn't taken at 15, with the perception being that he fell farther than he should have.

CoMoChief 08-11-2008 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4908528)
Unless you think that Linebacker is the next Derrick Thomas, there is no way you can value an outside Linebacker over a potential franchise QB.

23 other teams passed on Rodgers. Derrick Johnson fell to the 15th pick which was a ****in miracle that happened.

When Detroit selected Mike Williams I jumped out of my chair knowing that DJ would fall to KC.

Demonpenz 08-11-2008 11:03 PM

The thing that sucks is every year a player is "just another guy" is another year closer to an acl tear or something that keeps him out a year. What was supposed to be a breakout years ends in pain and so and so is carted off the field, doctors say he may never be the player he was...even if that player wasn't that great

Buehler445 08-11-2008 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908773)
It's because of the value placed on that position, if you take a devalued position really high he has to be above the general player.

If you take a Guard in the first round he has to be Steve Hutchinson for the pick to be worth it.

That wasn't the question. The opening thread didn't ask if we should take a LB over a QB in 2005. The question asked if we are better with DJ than we would be with Aaron Rogers.

The guy has played one game, and broke his goddamned foot. If DJ has a Donnie Edwards type career and Aaron Rogers has a Joey Harrington type career, DJ is the better deal. Those aren't huge reaches for either player. But at this point, it doesn't matter one bit what position they were drafted or whether it is a devalued position or any of that shit. It's pretty simple IMO. If DJ contributes more to winning than does Rogers, he's the better deal. Who gives a flying feces if they were a devalued pick?

It doesn't matter at this point anyways. Rogers hans't done anything but break himself. To come to any conclusion now is rediculous.

crazycoffey 08-11-2008 11:07 PM

nuthooks...

Spicy McHaggis 08-11-2008 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 4908506)
The 2005 Draft was a flop for just about everybody except a handful of teams.

God, you're right. Unless some of those guys turn it around soon that first round was awful.

Ugly Duck 08-12-2008 12:45 AM

Dang.... you ChiefsFanz is hard to please! Derrick freakin Johnson falls to you in the draft and you question the pick. Heck - I'd trade Thomas Horward for DJ straight up in a minute. Thomas Howard is what he is, DJ has way more up side. He has the talent potential to be a star. I think it would be fantastic for KC to give up on DJ at this point in his career! Just make sure you trade him outside the division....

JuicesFlowing 08-12-2008 01:55 AM

I'm glad the Chiefs drafted DJ.

mikey23545 08-12-2008 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908521)
You have bad drafts placing need above all...

Oh, so taking Johnson was a reach?

You are so full of shit.

PhillyChiefFan 08-12-2008 05:08 AM

Hindsight's 20/20. I like Johnson, I think he will be a big leader along with Dorsey on the defense.

Rodgers will be a good QB, but personally I liked our pick then and I like it still.

blueballs 08-12-2008 07:11 AM

shit
after all the trouble we had with the last Aa

Deberg_1990 08-12-2008 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugly Duck (Post 4908886)
Dang.... you ChiefsFanz is hard to please! Derrick freakin Johnson falls to you in the draft and you question the pick. Heck - I'd trade Thomas Horward for DJ straight up in a minute. Thomas Howard is what he is, DJ has way more up side. He has the talent potential to be a star. I think it would be fantastic for KC to give up on DJ at this point in his career! Just make sure you trade him outside the division....

DJ is a solid player, but at this point he is not spectacular.

The question should be: Do you value a potential franchise QB over a solid outside linebacker?

Messier 08-12-2008 07:28 AM

I wouldn't want to have Aaron Rogers and no DJ. I don't think Rogers is that much better than Croyle. And this D is counting on DJ. He is now the best player on the defense.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-12-2008 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 4908692)
To be a LB like Johnson to make his pick worth it he has to become Keith Bulluck and Bulluck right now is one of the very best OLB's in the league.

Keith Bulluck is also entering into his 9th year in the league and didn't do squat his first couple seasons. Compared to what Bulluck did his first 3 years, DJ is WELL ahead. Who's to say that DJ won't continue to get better, just as it took Bulluck 3 years to even get major playing time.

RealSNR 08-12-2008 10:01 AM

Uhhh huhhhh. Right.

So I'd rather have Brodie Croyle than Aaron Rodgers at this point. What does that mean in relation to Johnson, who has started for how many consecutive years on this team and made great plays for equally as long?

el borracho 08-12-2008 10:01 AM

What has Aaron Rodgers done to date? Aaron Rodgers is so great that the pack drafted Brian Brohm in the 2nd round this year.

Demonpenz 08-12-2008 10:03 AM

AJ hawk, nick barnett, Derrick johnson would have been a nice linebacking core

arrowheadnation 08-12-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 4908492)
Should the Chiefs have drafted Aaron Rodgers over Derrick Johnson?

No Carl should have kept his damn mouth shut last year instead of publicly stating he would take Brady Quinn if he was still on the board. The Browns conveniently traded one spot ahead of us and took him.

ChiefsCountry 08-12-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aarowheadnation (Post 4909468)
No Carl should have kept his damn mouth shut last year instead of publicly stating he would take Brady Quinn if he was still on the board. The Browns conveniently traded one spot ahead of us and took him.

Yeah we picked some scrub though with our pick. Besides Quinn was projected as a top 10 pick, it was pure luck he dropped.

Hammock Parties 08-12-2008 11:45 AM

Croyle > Asshole Quinn

Frosty 08-12-2008 12:01 PM

Just say "No" to Tedford QBs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Tedford

Quote:

Tedford is known as a groomer of NFL quarterbacks. Once in the NFL, however, they tend to experience very limited success. He coached each of the following first round NFL draft picks at the quarterback position:

* Fresno State
o Trent Dilfer 6th overall 1994, Tampa Bay Buccaneers

* Oregon
o Akili Smith 3rd overall 1999, Cincinnati Bengals
o Joey Harrington 3rd overall 2002, Detroit Lions

* California
o Kyle Boller 19th overall 2003, Baltimore Ravens
o Aaron Rodgers 24th overall 2005, Green Bay Packers

Tedford also coached Billy Volek, a backup quarterback for the San Diego Chargers, and A.J. Feeley, a backup quarterback for the Philadelphia Eagles. Dilfer won a Super Bowl with the Baltimore Ravens.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.