ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Fantasy/CasinoPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Uh, Oh Rodgers is my starting QB (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278310)

jjchieffan 11-04-2013 09:41 PM

Uh, Oh Rodgers is my starting QB
 
My backup is Luck, so I'm not hosed. But still thinking if Rodgers is out 4-5 weeks with a collarbone injury, then I better jump on another QB. My league actually has a few decent options. Alex Smith is available and has actually put up decent fantasy numbers several times this year, plus he faces all bottom of the league pass defenses the rest of the year. Cutler is available and is supposed to come back next week. Foles is available and after his 7 TD performance last week, I'm very tempted to grab him. But one week does not a season make. He was crap against Denver and Dallas but phenomenal against TB and Chokeland. Then there's Wallace. He is doing well in relief of Rodgers and has good weapons. Eli is available too, and he has been better lately and has a history of finishing a season strong. I don't know. Any thoughts?

crossbow 11-04-2013 09:54 PM

Foles would be very tempting but then you remember the two bad games. Do you have two defenses and one that has had a bye yet? You could replace it with a temporary QB until Rogers returns. This time of year is tough with the injuries.

AndChiefs 11-04-2013 09:58 PM

Game over man.

lewdog 11-04-2013 10:07 PM

Just bend me over and stick it in.

jjchieffan 11-04-2013 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crossbow (Post 10161168)
Foles would be very tempting but then you remember the two bad games. Do you have two defenses and one that has had a bye yet? You could replace it with a temporary QB until Rogers returns. This time of year is tough with the injuries.

No. I have one Defense, the Chiefs, and of course they're on bye. I am probably gonna drop Boykin for my QB choice.

sedated 11-05-2013 11:11 AM

Just stick with Luck, he is a QB1 for a lot of people.

No need to turn your team upside down (ie, drop someone important) to replace a QB that may only be out for 3 weeks.

Skyy God 11-05-2013 11:19 AM

Pick up Foles, as he has higher upside than Luck.

alpha_omega 11-05-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjchieffan (Post 10161112)
My backup is Luck, so I'm not hosed. But still thinking if Rodgers is out 4-5 weeks with a collarbone injury, then I better jump on another QB. My league actually has a few decent options. Alex Smith is available and has actually put up decent fantasy numbers several times this year, plus he faces all bottom of the league pass defenses the rest of the year. Cutler is available and is supposed to come back next week. Foles is available and after his 7 TD performance last week, I'm very tempted to grab him. But one week does not a season make. He was crap against Denver and Dallas but phenomenal against TB and Chokeland. Then there's Wallace. He is doing well in relief of Rodgers and has good weapons. Eli is available too, and he has been better lately and has a history of finishing a season strong. I don't know. Any thoughts?

I'm in exactly the same boat...I'm sticking with Luck.

Skyy God 11-05-2013 01:01 PM

Platooning Cutler and Foles looks like a solid strategy.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantas...4603--nfl.html

sedated 11-05-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10162335)
Pick up Foles, as he has higher upside than Luck.

Not sure I understand the logic on this one.

lewdog 11-05-2013 08:07 PM

I traded Mike Wallace for Tony Romo.

Ceej 11-05-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 10163770)
I traded Mike Wallace for Tony Romo.

Wow.

Rape.

lewdog 11-05-2013 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ceej (Post 10163785)
Wow.

Rape.

which way?

Ceej 11-05-2013 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 10163962)
which way?

Landing Romo for a turd.

n00b, duh.

SPATCH 11-06-2013 10:10 AM

DAWG. Are you kidding? Start Luck and feel good doing it. Don't even **** around and try to get cute here.

If you feel like you have a roster spot available and you want to snag another QB then, sure, pick up Foles. But don't **** around man.. start Luck.

If Foles becomes unavailable, another high-upside guy that I like is Keenum.

Skyy God 11-06-2013 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 10163172)
Not sure I understand the logic on this one.

Luck has shittier weapons around him and a harder schedule. Literally all his games are against defenses that are average to good at defending the pass (red or orange in Yahoo's color scheme).

Pablo 11-06-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10165184)
Luck has shittier weapons around him and a harder schedule. Literally all his games are against defenses that are average to good at defending the pass (red or orange in Yahoo's color scheme).

Luck is going to be fine with his weapons. He's building a bond with T.Y. Hilton that ought to help stretch a defense.

I think he'll be just fine.

SPATCH 11-06-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10165184)
Luck has shittier weapons around him and a harder schedule. Literally all his games are against defenses that are average to good at defending the pass (red or orange in Yahoo's color scheme).

Luck is matchup-proof because of his running ability.

People pull their hair out over matchups this time of year. So unnecessary. Always start studs.

Skyy God 11-06-2013 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 10165316)
Luck is matchup-proof because of his running ability.

People pull their hair out over matchups this time of year. So unnecessary. Always start studs.

He's 9th in total points my scoring system. That hardly qualifies as a matchup-proof stud in the Manning/Brees/ARod class.

sedated 11-06-2013 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10165329)
He's 9th in total points my scoring system. That hardly qualifies as a matchup-proof stud in the Manning/Brees/ARod class.

That can change from week to week. Rivers has been everywhere from 3 to 11 and back to 5 in a matter of weeks.

Say what you want about his rankings but there isn’t a person who, if there was a re-draft today for the rest of this season, would take Foles over Luck.

sedated 11-06-2013 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10165184)
Luck Literally all his games are against defenses that are average to good at defending the pass (red or orange in Yahoo's color scheme).

Zac friggin Stacy just put up 130 yards a TD against one of top 5 run Ds in the league.

lewdog 11-06-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ceej (Post 10163987)
Landing Romo for a turd.

n00b, duh.

Yea and he proposed the trade. I was shocked.

Skyy God 11-07-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 10165822)
That can change from week to week. Rivers has been everywhere from 3 to 11 and back to 5 in a matter of weeks.

Say what you want about his rankings but there isn’t a person who, if there was a re-draft today for the rest of this season, would take Foles over Luck.

I'm not advocating dropping Luck for Foles, just picking the latter up and playing the matchups.

jjchieffan 11-09-2013 03:11 PM

LOL. A guy in my league had 3 QB's on his roster. He chose to drop Rivers to pick up a kicker (He kept Romo and Newton) because his was on by. I jumped on that and dropped Boykin. Rivers should put up big fantasy points against Denver this week. I'm not so worried about losing Rodgers now.

Skyy God 11-10-2013 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 10165822)
That can change from week to week. Rivers has been everywhere from 3 to 11 and back to 5 in a matter of weeks.

Say what you want about his rankings but there isn’t a person who, if there was a re-draft today for the rest of this season, would take Foles over Luck.

Luck, 3 picks. Foles, 3 TDs.

Still drafting Luck based on his pedigree over Foles' production?

jjchieffan 11-10-2013 08:32 PM

Played Rivers over Luck today thinking Rivers would rape against the Donks defense. I guess I shouldn't have, 16.8 for Luck, 13.8 for Rivers

sedated 11-11-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10174234)
Luck, 3 picks. Foles, 3 TDs.

Still drafting Luck based on his pedigree over Foles' production?

Yes. Luck hasn’t exactly been a slouch this year. Plus they chuck the ball all over the field. One bad (horrific, actually) game doesn’t change that.

Could my opinion change if this were to continue? Of course. But that's the way fantasy goes.



BTW, Gio got me 19.5 despite his "brutal" matchup. Your pick of Spiller got a whopping 6.4

sedated 11-11-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 10174234)
Luck, 3 picks. Foles, 3 TDs.

Oh, and I played against Luck this week

<img src="http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/30500000/I-Ain-t-Even-Mad-the-fresh-prince-of-bel-air-30565881-400-300.png">

Skyy God 11-11-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 10177595)
Yes. Luck hasn’t exactly been a slouch this year. Plus they chuck the ball all over the field. One bad (horrific, actually) game doesn’t change that.

Could my opinion change if this were to continue? Of course. But that's the way fantasy goes.

BTW, Gio got me 19.5 despite his "brutal" matchup. Your pick of Spiller got a whopping 6.4

Eh, I've never really owned any shares in Spiller, so it's not like I follow his ups and downs closely.

So it goes. I started Gio in one league, didn't in another (where there were no truly bad options: Bush, Stacy, Gio, 'Dre Brown).

Skyy God 11-15-2013 11:13 AM

232/31/1. Lucktastic!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.