CaptainMorgan |
03-04-2024 12:12 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
(Post 17426926)
It's been my opinion that we should be developing young QB's behind Mahomes for a few years now.
Let's be honest, if Mahomes goes down, we're not going anywhere anyway. No lousy veteran is going to win us multiple games or play-off games. Season's over.
I'd much rather be rolling with young back-ups that we could develop and flip for picks like Andy did for years with the Eagles.
|
I get the logic here, and intuitively it does make some sense, but I think there are practical reasons (that other's have brought up) for why we see the vet backup. Reality is that we've already seen the vet backup pay dividends over the past six years (Moore coming in when Pat was down with the knee to win key games en route to a SB, Henne coming in during the Browns game for a playoff win, and Henne coming in during the Jags game for a key drive).
God forbid if Pat was down for a season, it's not going to matter who the back up is. But if he's down for a quarter, or a game or two, that's were a capable veteran who can steal a game can be the difference between a SB season or not. That is real value that we've already experienced first hand. The value in drafting, developing and then flipping a young backup QB for picks needs a lot of things to go right, just to get what? a Mid round pick?
The other element here is that when you're a dynasty like we are, everyone wants to get paid and shit is expensive. We need all the picks we can muster to draft and develop talent around Pat on both sides of the ball. UDFA QB prospect that we try to strike gold on and then flip? Sure, I'm all for it. Doesn't deplete draft capital and we can develop them on the practice roster. But committing draft capital to the back up QB spot in hopes of a speculative future draft pick, and then having said young QB on the roster and be counted on in key moments I don't think serves our interests. Just my opinion.
|