People are just pissed it was louder and more flash-bangy than the average Star Trek film.
It wasn't necessarily a bad thing, it was just different. The core of Star Trek has always been the relationship between the characters. I am still somewhat concerned that's going to be lost. I guess we'll see. I still would like to see a Star Trek film with a great plot like VI. That has always been my favorite. I don't know if Abrams is that kind of guy though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you like the reboot? And what do you think Abrams & Co did well if not plot and character? Would you say spectacle was his number one priority? Or at least, that he made a film where the spectacle was better executed than plot and character? Because I don't think anyone could argue that the spectacle of the film was outstanding. The visuals are phenomenal. I thought the plot was well executed, if a little straight forward. Unless we're considering the nature of the reboot as part of the plot. In which case, I'd say the plot was genius. This is the first franchise reboot that I've ever seen that is a genuine reboot. But, at it's core, it's the characters that elevated the movie, for me. If it had just been an action extravaganza with no substance, I wouldn't own it and watch it over and over again. |
Quote:
But I would add that I think they did a great job with the character development. Especially since they were essentially reintroducing characters we already know and care about. |
Interesting conversation about the first one (the reboot).
I saw it in theaters and liked it a lot. This week, I rewatched it for the first time, on TV, and found I liked it a lot less. I was wincing at several scenes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I seem to like it more and more each time I watch it. I've seen it well over a dozen times now and I just smile ear to ear. It hits all the right notes for me. Hoping this next one continues the standards set in terms of spectacle and imagination, but with, perhaps, a darker bend. Abrams & Co keep talking about TDK as a major influence, as a paradigm for what a franchise sequel should look/feel like. I hope they are able to achieve their version of The Dark Knight. |
If you want to get picky from things I didn't like about the reboot there are many. There are no cliffs like that in Iowa. If he had maybe driven to Dubuque he could have driven over the bluffs.
The really big thing was the way they got away from the black hole at the end. They ejected all the warp engine cores and blew them up so that the explosion would give them a push to get going. First off any explosion would have been swallowed by the black hole. Second, you've just expended the power cells that fuels your engines. How would they get away? |
It's Star Trek, dude. Star Trek science is always full of bullshit.
|
Quote:
The characters were fine, but they still lacked the chemistry that the old cast had built up. Plotwise it fell short...it was mostly about spectacle and building up a few key characters. It'll be interesting to see how they proceed. |
Quote:
And the impulse engines aren't powered by the warp core. But yeah, the black hole would have swallowed the explosion. That was lame. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.