ChiefsPlanet
Page 7 of 13 « First 3456 7 891011 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs looking to Trade down (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270402)

ToxSocks 02-26-2013 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 9440555)
Detriot shopped the top pick when Stafford was their pick too. Even if it was a token shop around, I recall seeing it at that time.

My guess is that is what is happening here now. Shop it to see if there are any takers. Nothing short of a massive haul of draft picks will sway Dorsey and Reid though.

JMO
I agree.

The only year i remember in which the pick wasn't shopped was last year. Every other year is the same shit.

Coogs 02-26-2013 11:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440696)
Stafford was also a homerun of a prospect. Geno Smith is more of a ground rule double.
Stafford had some warts before the draft. It wasn't a slam dunk he was going #1 until later in the process.

Direckshun 02-26-2013 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 9440712)
Stafford had some warts before the draft. It wasn't a slam dunk he was going #1 until later in the process.
Yeah, no.

It was a slam dunk from day one.

htismaqe 02-26-2013 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440696)
Stafford was also a homerun of a prospect. Geno Smith is more of a ground rule double.
Stafford had character concerns coming out. He was a slam dunk because it was the Lions picking first.

If it would have been us, Stafford wouldn't have been worth the #1.

That's EXACTLY what is going on here.

Direckshun 02-26-2013 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9440763)
Stafford had character concerns coming out. He was a slam dunk because it was the Lions picking first.

If it would have been us, Stafford wouldn't have been worth the #1.

That's EXACTLY what is going on here.
So you're alleging there's a media conspiracy to dissuade KC's interest in Geno?

Am I understanding that correctly?

Stafford was a far superior prospect, by the way, to Geno.

The Franchise 02-26-2013 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440730)
Yeah, no.

It was a slam dunk from day one.
No it wasn't dude. Curry and Smith were talked about there as well.

Reerun_KC 02-26-2013 11:27 AM
Winners draft QB's...

Loser shop for value...

htismaqe 02-26-2013 11:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440812)
So you're alleging there's a media conspiracy to dissuade KC's interest in Geno?

Am I understanding that correctly?

Stafford was a far superior prospect, by the way, to Geno.
There has to be something, doesn't there?

And Stafford was a superior prospect. A FAR superior one? I don't think so.

htismaqe 02-26-2013 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 9440825)
Winners draft QB's...

Loser shop for value...
This.

Reerun_KC 02-26-2013 11:31 AM
If we had a franchise QB in place, I would shop the hell out of that pick...

but franchises with franchise QB's arent picking #1 over all either. Amazing how that works.

Sadly our fanbase panics that the thought of someone screwing up their tailgate and hope for a playoff spot...

Ming the Merciless 02-26-2013 11:31 AM
Of course we are looking to trade down......If we could drop to 10-15 and still get a Geno, Bray or Barkley.....wouldn't tht be win/win?

Chiefs=Champions 02-26-2013 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440812)
So you're alleging there's a media conspiracy to dissuade KC's interest in Geno?

Am I understanding that correctly?

Stafford was a far superior prospect, by the way, to Geno.
Its time to get out of the gutter man. Dust yourself off and throw away that wine.

Direckshun 02-26-2013 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9440829)
There has to be something, doesn't there?

And Stafford was a superior prospect. A FAR superior one? I don't think so.
Stafford was the third best prospect of the past five years, behind only Luck and RG3.

To claim that Geno Smith is just a hair shy of Stafford's standing as a prospect is misguided. I desperately want us to draft the guy, but I'm not going to blind myself that drafting Smith is legitimately a reach.

htismaqe 02-26-2013 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indignayshun (Post 9440855)
Stafford was the third best prospect of the past five years, behind only Luck and RG3.

To claim that Geno Smith is just a hair shy of Stafford's standing as a prospect is misguided. I desperately want us to draft the guy, but I'm not going to blind myself that drafting Smith is legitimately a reach.
ROFL

He isn't a reach. He's a better prospect than Sam Bradford and Matt Ryan.

htismaqe 02-26-2013 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 9440845)
Of course we are looking to trade down......If we could drop to 10-15 and still get a Geno, Bray or Barkley.....wouldn't tht be win/win?
Of course it would but it's not happening.

The Cardinals said Barkley isn't falling past them. The Bills have openly expressed that they want to draft a QB.

We trade down to 10 and we'll end up with no QB.

**** that noise.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:46 AM.
Page 7 of 13 « First 3456 7 891011 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.