ChiefsPlanet
Page 7 of 10 « First 3456 7 8910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Better pick: Toby Gerhardt or McCluster? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227249)

Delano 04-25-2010 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 6714248)
No he wasn't, the author of post #64 and 65 is the mult. Look again.
OIC. Ban 'em both and ask questions later.
Posted via Mobile Device

jspchief 04-25-2010 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6713971)
FB's shouldn't be drafted in the second round.
Neither should RB to slot WR projects, but I digress.

RustShack 04-25-2010 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 6714282)
Neither should RB to slot WR projects, but I digress.
Hes a more talented version of Golden Tate.

WildTurkey 04-25-2010 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 6714282)
Neither should RB to slot WR projects, but I digress.
He's no project...... he was a wr in college before being moved to the rb position to get him more touches

jspchief 04-25-2010 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6714294)
Hes a more talented version of Golden Tate.
I certainly hope so. I'm not a fan of using that pick on a guy that will never be more than a slot receiver, let alone a really small one that made his name in college doing something other than playing a conventional position.

Ming the Merciless 04-25-2010 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 6714306)
I certainly hope so. I'm not a fan of using that pick on a guy that will never be more than a slot receiver, let alone a really small one that made his name in college doing something other than playing a conventional position.
+rep

This is how I feel. With the 36th overall I think we couldve and shouldve come up with something better...but I hope to eat major crow. (btw I am not saying it is Gerhardt who I wanted at 36, I just put him in there to see the result of the poll)

88TG88 04-25-2010 09:42 PM
wtf is going on here

BigMeatballDave 04-26-2010 05:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714041)
HAHAHHAHA

wow...

BCD is Rustshack right? This is a practical joke, correct?
GFY

BigMeatballDave 04-26-2010 05:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714205)
For example can you answer which is a better draft pick:

Ryan Leaf or Charles Woodson


Also apples to oranges but most people can answer the question.
You're a ****ing moron. Considering Leaf sucked and is outta the league, of course its Woodson. This line of questioning is reeruned. Who's the better pick, Jeff George or Ed Reed? See? Stupid...

BigMeatballDave 04-26-2010 05:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714227)
Me? I swear I am not a mult if you are referring to me...I think Rustshack and BCD are though, seriously. I think he logs in BCD and agrees with himself...kind of a self-stroke wack off session.

I am just new, I came from another board that would have kicked me off a long time ago for saying any one of the the things I have said here today alone...

I am in love with CP and it's denizens. This place is the best...I am so addicted.
Me? I've been here since the boards inception. I've never made a mult. Kindly go fist yourself.

Consistent1 04-26-2010 06:00 AM
To me they are both decent picks given where they went.Minn doesn't need a McCluster.They need a guy to take a few carries off of Peterson and be a durable 2nd option.KC needs a shifty guy that can possibly break long catches or runs.Can't really compare the two,and for us Dexter was clearly a better pick.
Posted via Mobile Device

Coach 04-26-2010 06:08 AM
Honestly, I think McCluster will have a more productive career than Gerhardt. McCluster is more of a jack-of-all-trades while Gerhardt is more of a traditional FB with probably being a goal-line halfback.

Gerhardt's short-shuttle drill was a 4.25, while McCluster’s was at 4.06. The short shuttle never gets the attention it deserves, but running back (or to a degree, a slot receiver) is a position that’s consistently asked to change directions and accelerate out of breaks. One could even make the case that the short shuttle has much more bearing on a prospect’s chances in the NFL than the 40.

Just for shit and giggles, Darren Sproles' shuttle time was 4.15.

Ming the Merciless 04-26-2010 10:41 AM
Good Knowledge, coach.

Simply Red 04-26-2010 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 6714035)
It was in the ****ing question you stupid ignoramus...

Jesus christ.

READ THE ****ING QUESTION


whoa, you're quite the talent.

Simply Red 04-26-2010 11:41 AM
I meant 'taint' - you're quite the taint.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.
Page 7 of 10 « First 3456 7 8910
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.