Quote:
The Chiefs have Moeaki and Fasano. Why take a 3rd TE when there are glaring issues at other positions of need? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
NO ONE on this forum had TE as a position of need. Yet now that we've spend our 2nd highest pick on one, people are now rationalizing it like we needed one. LMAO
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Because we can't trust Moeaki to stay healthy! Heck he hasn't even participated in the OTA's yet because he is what? HURT!!!
|
Ok,the experts are compare this guy to Gronkowski, and he may very well be that good. However, KC has the best TE in the history of the NFL for the majority of his career. And KC still lost every playoff game with said TE. Not only that, it took the best TE in the history of the NFL his entire career to even win a playoff game.
Toss into this that KC signed a stop gap solution at TE. So, please tell me why this is such a great move with holes at DL, ILB, S, and still a smoking crater at QB? Anyone?? |
Kelce is a damn good player. I guess they don't like or trust Moeaki.
So I guess I'm good with it. ILB and WR is pretty deep so hopefully they get a two in the 3rd and 4th. Because QB is not happening. |
Quote:
|
Are we out of draft picks? I thought we had more left? :facepalm:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Lot of guys the Chiefs could have taken that weren't Barkley.
Keenan Allen, Damontre Moore, Bacarri Rambo, Terrence Williams, Barret Jones, Quinton Patton, and many, many others. Kelce was somewhere between the 4th-8th TE in the class. Just don't see the upside relative to the investment, especially given KC's holes. |
Quote:
But hey... that gives him a mean streak according to people here... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.