ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Teicher:On first play at camp, Chiefs show their new look (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=274833)

Chiefs Pantalones 07-27-2013 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9838950)
I'm no Alice Smiff ballwasher, but that's a little ridiculous. You're making Romo sound like Favre or something. I'd be just as unenthusiastic with Romo under center as I'd be with Smiff.

I just wanna win three games this year man. Baby steps lol. :)

Mav 07-27-2013 06:16 PM

I think I understand now.

GoChargers 07-27-2013 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9838976)
I just wanna win three games this year man. Baby steps lol. :)

As long as the Chargers only win 2. #CollapseForClowney

We'll let you have Johnny Football or Bridgewater. :)

Easy 6 07-27-2013 06:21 PM

[QUOTE=Coogs;9838903]Smith in 2 playoff games has 5 TD's and 0 INT's. That ain't bad.]

Now you just shush! scat cat! thats not the popular narrative.

Chiefs Pantalones 07-27-2013 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChargers (Post 9838990)
As long as the Chargers only win 2. #CollapseForClowney

We'll let you have Johnny Football or Bridgewater. :)

LMAO

Anything more than 2 wins for me is gravy with what happened last year. Clowney could have a Bobby Bouche impact for whoever picks him lol.

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9838955)
You get a shoulder injury that effectively ends your next 2 seasons? Yup. Well played sir, well played.

You know he only played 7 games that season..and 4 of them with the injury. He was 2 and 1 prior to being injured. So your commentary was actually on Dilfer.


People should be careful when they play with stats...they might get burned...

Why are you lying?

Alex Smith was 2-5 that year in 7 starts.

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 06:42 PM

Look at Alex Smith doing nothing for an entire quarter AND overtime while Tony Romo wins the damn game.

Alex Smith had three chances to win the game here and did absolutely nothing but get sacked and fart around.

He gave Romo enough chances and then BOOM, 77-yard killshot.

http://i.imgur.com/suCv9I5.jpg

RunKC 07-27-2013 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9838751)
And he's miles better than Alex Smith.

In fact he beat him head to head. In 2011.

I'd take a lot of QB's in the playoffs over Tony Romo, including Alex Smith.

Romo is so overrated. He's on very talented teams every year and throws it all away when the pressure is on.

OnTheWarpath15 07-27-2013 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9839095)
I'd take a lot of QB's in the playoffs over Tony Romo, including Alex Smith.

Romo is so overrated. He's on very talented teams every year and throws it all away when the pressure is on.

Where exactly is this talent?

He has a shitty OL. No consistent running game. Bryant's a stud but Austin can't stay healthy, and his defense has him constantly in shoot outs.

Bryant, Witten and needing to score 28 a game isn't exactly paradise.

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9839095)
I'd take a lot of QB's in the playoffs over Tony Romo, including Alex Smith.

Romo is so overrated. He's on very talented teams every year and throws it all away when the pressure is on.

Talented teams that have shitty running games and awful defenses?

Serious question: how does Alex Smith do in Dallas last season?

OnTheWarpath15 07-27-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839122)
Talented teams that have shitty running games and awful defenses?

Serious question: how does Alex Smith do in Dallas last season?

Des Bryant bubble screen, pray for YAC.

keg in kc 07-27-2013 07:02 PM

Nah, they'd install the read-option. That's definitely not a gimmick that the league will figure out shortly.

Coogs 07-27-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9839140)
Nah, they'd install the read-option. That's definitely not a gimmick that the league will figure out shortly.

I can't remember where I read this, so I can not link it, but the next big thing to come of of the read-option is supposed to be the play action pass. I could see where that could be a good thing for us with Charles as the RB.

keg in kc 07-27-2013 07:12 PM

I remember reading around superbowl time how part of the reason SF kept Kaep on the field is because ASmith couldn't effectively run the read-option, that he allowed them to do things they couldn't do with Smith under center. And then in march the reason we picked him up is because he's so effective with the WCO. And now we're installing the read-option. It's so bizarre how all these stories are going. It's like every story contradicts the last.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839122)
Talented teams that have shitty running games and awful defenses?

Serious question: how does Alex Smith do in Dallas last season?

You haven't mentioned at all, in that Dallas SF game, Crabtree didn't play, and Braylon got hurt on his second play of the game.

But, nah, that don't matter.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9839172)
I remember reading around superbowl time how part of the reason SF kept Kaep on the field is because ASmith couldn't effectively run the read-option, that he allowed them to do things they couldn't do with Smith under center. And then in march the reason we picked him up is because he's so effective with the WCO. And now we're installing the read-option. It's so bizarre how all these stories are going. It's like every story contradicts the last.

That's not the case. They didn't even install the Read option for Kaep, until after the Saints game. Kaep fumbled 4 snaps that he took under center in that game. That's when they did the read option.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839122)
Talented teams that have shitty running games and awful defenses?

Serious question: how does Alex Smith do in Dallas last season?

Terrible. No running game, bad oline, crappy defense. He would of done worse than Romo....

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9839461)
You haven't mentioned at all, in that Dallas SF game, Crabtree didn't play, and Braylon got hurt on his second play of the game.

But, nah, that don't matter.

How does that excuse taking horrible sacks? It doesn't.

Alex Smith sat around with his thumb up his butt for over a quarter while Romo won the game.

We've been dealing with that kind of QB for years now.

Jakemall 07-27-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839035)
Why are you lying?

Alex Smith was 2-5 that year in 7 starts.

Alex was hurt in the beginning of the 4th game. He was 2 and 1 going into the game. The injury was season ending. He tried to tough it out and played like crap before going on IR. What part of this do you struggle to comprehend?

Why did you lie and attribute games played by Dilfer to Alex?

SAUTO 07-27-2013 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9839466)
Terrible. No running game, bad oline, crappy defense. He would of done worse than Romo....

he hasn't ever been close in any year to romo last year...
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9839474)
Alex was hurt in the beginning of the 4th game. He was 2 and 1 going into the game. The injury was season ending. He tried to tough it out and played like crap before going on IR. What part of this do you struggle to comprehend?

Why did you lie and attribute games played by Dilfer to Alex?

I didn't.

Just pointed out that the 49ers sucked that year and Alex sucked in his 7 games.

He's not a guy who can "elevate" his teammates.

notorious 07-27-2013 08:17 PM

We had shit QBs and the most horrifically reeruned offensive staff in football history last year.

I plan on seeing vast improvement from McCluster and other players like him.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839481)
I didn't.

Just pointed out that the 49ers sucked that year and Alex sucked in his 7 games.

He's not a guy who can "elevate" his teammates.

All of these absolutes. I prefer to wait and see them play the games.

Jakemall 07-27-2013 08:28 PM

BS.

He played 7 games total. He was hurt in the 4th game and did not ot play after the 1st qtr. He played 3 more games hurt before deciding that he was a liability with the injury. He did not produce 8-8 as you imply. He was 2-1 healthy. He didnt play much the 4th game. Played 3 more games injured because Nolan pushed.

What part do you want to deny?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9838822)
You know what happens when Alex Smith plays with a running game and defense in the bottom 10?

You get this abortion.

Shit, this guy played with the 4th ranked defense and produced an 8-8 season.


Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9839518)
BS.

He played 7 games total. He was hurt in the 4th game and did not ot play after the 1st qtr. He played 3 more games hurt before deciding that he was a liability with the injury. He did not produce 8-8 as you imply. He was 2-1 healthy. He didnt play much the 4th game. Played 3 more games injured because Nolan pushed.

What part do you want to deny?

He played in 10 games and had a 5-5 record on an 8-8 team.

Stats here. 2009 season. Did you get confused?

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/sfo/2009.htm

I'm pretty sure he was shitty as **** while the 4th ranked defense cursed his name ever night.

Jakemall 07-27-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839523)
He played in 10 games and had a 5-5 record on an 8-8 team.

Stats here. 2009 season. Did you get confused?



I'm pretty sure he was shitty as **** while the 4th ranked defense cursed his name ever night.

2007. You are trying to change dates. Damn, you are good.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839523)
He played in 10 games and had a 5-5 record on an 8-8 team.

Stats here. 2009 season. Did you get confused?

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/sfo/2009.htm

I'm pretty sure he was shitty as **** while the 4th ranked defense cursed his name ever night.

he didn't play bad in 2009. That was the best hes ever played actually.

Jakemall 07-27-2013 08:40 PM

Mav would you quote the first post of page 26 for me. I can't quote links.

Mav 07-27-2013 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9838822)
You know what happens when Alex Smith plays with a running game and defense in the bottom 10?

You get this abortion.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...s/sfo/2007.htm

Shit, this guy played with the 4th ranked defense and produced an 8-8 season.

here it is.

Hammock Parties 07-27-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9839534)
he didn't play bad in 2009. That was the best hes ever played actually.

Played well enough to get a team with a #4 defense to 8-8.

Holy ****ing shit.

There's your ceiling, folks!

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-27-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9839892)
Played well enough to get a team with a #4 defense to 8-8.

Holy ****ing shit.

There's your ceiling, folks!

LMAO Arguing with someone who can't argue back...

AdumbGuy 07-27-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maverick91579 (Post 9837433)
sighs. No one knew what they were getting with Drew Brees when he signed with the Saints. The Chargers kicked him to the curb, the Dolphins didn't want him. New Orleans was his 3rd option.

Of course Alex Smith can realize his potential at this point. He wouldn't be the first to be a late bloomer now would he?

Understand the CONTEXT of what I am saying.

Rich Gannon, and Kurt Warner. No, not saying that Alex Smith can be either one of those, but, Alex has a very similar skill set to Gannon. Mobility, their plusses as qbs being short accuracy, and being very smart.

Its amazing what situation and place can do for a guys career.

that's not true. Marty wanted to keep Brees. His GM wanted to move on with the younger Rivers. You know, the same idiot GM that fired marty after he went 14-2 and replaced him with the venerable Norv Turner. Brees was a legit non-game manager qb and he was still young at the time. CANNOT be compared to Alex "My best work in 7 years is as an efficient game manager" smith

GoChargers 07-27-2013 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9839948)
You know, the same idiot GM that fired marty after he went 14-2 and replaced him with the venerable Norv Turner.

To be fair, firing Marty wasn't idiotic. He was choking away playoff games every year as usual (including the most idiotic challenge of all time during his last playoff game with the Chargers), he was insubordinate (the same reason he was fired in Washington), and he was trying to hook his family members up with jobs regardless of qualification. The time had come for a new coach.

Replacing Marty with Norv Turner was so dumb, it helped cripple the franchise for a very long time and cost AJ his job (AJ's shit drafts and cheapness played a role in that too).

And getting rid of Brees wasn't THAT idiotic. At the time, it was extremely questionable whether he'd ever play again because of his shoulder injury (brought on by, surprise surprise, Marty being stubborn). And Rivers ended up being an elite quarterback until the past couple years.

milkman 07-28-2013 05:06 AM

Tony Romo, much like Brett Favre was, is a dumbass with big time playmaking ability.

Mike Holmgren was able to reel Favre in early on, and won a SB, but his dumbassery through the following years cost the Packers further opportunities.

Romo's playmaking keeps the Cowboys competitive, but his dumbassery costs them equally.

I'd be no more happy to have traded for him than I am with Alex Smith.

The only real question, how do you want to lose your playoff games?

Jakemall 08-10-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9838717)
We're talking about yards per completion.

That includes YAC.

Alex Smith doesn't throw the ball down the field, and his receivers don't pick up a lot of YAC either.

Sorry to disappoint.

LOL...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.