ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Star Trek 12 Gets Release Date (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221538)

Deberg_1990 04-04-2013 01:25 PM

Can you tell me where the Nuuuucleeaar Vvvvveeessles are?

DaneMcCloud 04-04-2013 01:38 PM

If this guy's spoiler info is correct (and I am extremely skeptical that it is), it's a damn good thing that Disney/LucasFilm hired writers outside of Abrams typical sphere of dumbasses, especially Lindelof.

For all the bluster and goodwill that Abrams created with his take on Star Trek, it really wasn't a very good film.

The best part was casting, IMO.

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9556537)
Screw that. I don't even like IV. While I recognize it's an entertaining movie, it's not Star Trek. It would be like Godfather film where Sonny, Fredo and Michael go work at a department store. Doesn't matter if it's good or not - it's not what it's supposed to be.

Why is it not Star Trek?

Lots of episodes from TOS have the cast traveling in time and doing stuff not in the 23rd century.

Fire Me Boy! 04-04-2013 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9556640)
I didn't hate it. I've watched it a few times over the years. It's funny and has a good story. It's just not Star Trek. It's like the crew having a group vacation between viable movies/episodes and somebody brought a camera along.

For Star Trek you need (a) a solid villain and (b) space battles. Chasing down a whaling ship in a Klingon bird of prey doesn't count.

And it also helps if Star Trek has the ENTERPRISE for more than the last ten seconds, too.

**** the whales.

You lost me at the implication that III and V are viable movies.

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 01:59 PM

There's nothing wrong with Star Trek III.

Christopher Lloyd is a little hammy but that's fine.

It's a beautiful movie about life, love, loss and friendship. :crybaby:

Frazod 04-04-2013 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9556935)
You lost me at the implication that III and V are viable movies.

Wasn't referring to them specifically. V is awful.

Fire Me Boy! 04-04-2013 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9556772)
Can you tell me where the Nuuuucleeaar Vvvvveeessles are?

YOU SCREWED IT UP. It should be "Nuuuucleeaar Wwwwweeessles"! The V was a W...

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/9781/reddumbass.jpg

DaneMcCloud 04-04-2013 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9556940)
There's nothing wrong with Star Trek III.

Christopher Lloyd is a little hammy but that's fine.

It's a beautiful movie about life, love, loss and friendship. :crybaby:

I cannot watch III. IV is more palatable but as it's been mentioned, it was hardly a Star Trek movie. It was more like a "Road Movie" with two likeable actors like Lemon and Matthau.

Frazod 04-04-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9556940)
There's nothing wrong with Star Trek III.

Christopher Lloyd is a little hammy but that's fine.

It's a beautiful movie about life, love, loss and friendship. :crybaby:

The good:

McCoy possessed by Spock
Escaping from Star Fleet/space station/trashing the Excelsior
Christopher Lloyd
Little space battle
Enterprise destroyed
Ending on Vulcan

The bad:

Robin Curtis
Continuity issues (Enterprise damage, Enterprise far older than 20 years)
Horrible sets/scenery for Genesis Planet
Kirk's kid is a pussy
Captain of Grissom is an even bigger pussy

Fire Me Boy! 04-04-2013 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9556987)
The good:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yX8kKEh8DGU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The bad:

McCoy possessed by Spock
Escaping from Star Fleet/space station/trashing the Excelsior
Christopher Lloyd
Little space battle
Enterprise destroyed
Ending on Vulcan
Robin Curtis
Continuity issues (Enterprise damage, Enterprise far older than 20 years)
Horrible sets/scenery for Genesis Planet
Kid's kid is a pussy
Captain of Grissom is an even bigger pussy

FYP

Frazod 04-04-2013 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9557010)
FYP

LMAO

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 05:34 PM

****ing whiners

it's a beautiful film

"jim...your name...is jim"

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 05:35 PM

star trek II, III and IV are a trilogy

they go together

they're beautiful

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9556962)
I cannot watch III. IV is more palatable but as it's been mentioned, it was hardly a Star Trek movie. It was more like a "Road Movie" with two likeable actors like Lemon and Matthau.

In that case the TOS episode where they travel back in time to 20th century earth isn't a Star Trek episode either!!!

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Tomo...erday_(episode)

AND NEITHER IS THIS ONE!

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/The_...rever_(episode)

OR THIS ONE!!!

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Assi...Earth_(episode)

keg in kc 04-04-2013 05:38 PM

Sure they're a trilogy.

Just like The Matrix.

Deberg_1990 04-04-2013 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9557564)
****ing whiners

it's a beautiful film

"jim...your name...is jim"


Sulu's best line ever!

"and dont call me Tiny"

Hammock Parties 04-04-2013 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9557626)
Sulu's best line ever!

"and dont call me Tiny"

Oh my god.

The entire stealing the Enterprise scene is the most fapworthy thing in the entire, entire, entire Star Trek movie mythos.

It's basically a heist film. It's like Ocean's 11 in space.

keg in kc 04-12-2013 05:22 PM

http://media.aintitcool.com/media/up...essposter3.jpg

Bowser 04-12-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9557628)
Oh my god.

The entire stealing the Enterprise scene is the most fapworthy thing in the entire, entire, entire Star Trek movie mythos.

It's basically a heist film. It's like Ocean's 11 in space.

"Kirk. You do this, and you'll never sit in the Captain's chair again."

"Warp speed."
"Aye sir, answering warp speed...."

Bowser 04-12-2013 05:57 PM

/nerd

Hammock Parties 04-12-2013 07:33 PM

http://pigeonchess.files.wordpress.c...kets.gif?w=450

DaneMcCloud 04-12-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9581211)

My excitement for this film wanes with every new reveal.

Hammock Parties 04-12-2013 07:37 PM

If they're going to destroy the Enterprise, that's a real cheap way to get thrills, and nothing but a ripoff.

Frazod 04-12-2013 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9581752)
If they're going to destroy the Enterprise, that's a real cheap way to get thrills, and nothing but a ripoff.

Could be misdirection. Probably is misdirection. They show it emerging from water in the beginning. Later we seen it crashing into water. They probably get the shields and engine fixed right as it's about to impact. I'll bet that's how it shakes out.

Chiefspants 04-12-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9581749)
My excitement for this film wanes with every new reveal.


Someone should compare this side to side with the new iron man 3 poster.

Deberg_1990 04-15-2013 05:15 PM

This wont make some fans happy. The Studio is openly admitting trying to get away from the space setting and the "Trekkiness" of it all.




http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...ramount-435647




Paramount is playing up Benedict Cumberbatch's villainous character in many foreign markets where a bad-guy-vs.-good-guy storyline resonates best. And the studio is promoting the fact that much of Into Darkness takes place on Earth -- not in space. "In many places, we did extensive research to find out what we should showcase," explains president of international distribution Anthony Marcoly. "Overseas, we've tried to get away from the Trekkiness of it all."

007 04-16-2013 01:18 AM

Well, when you think about it, even Star Trek First Contact was mostly on earth.

Fish 04-16-2013 02:02 PM

Trailer 3. Wow....

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5ec_rPApKCA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Barret 04-16-2013 02:27 PM

uhm....what ship is that at time stamp 1:16. And no not the Enterprise on the left but the large dark ship on the right. It looks like a Fed ship but is it a future Enterprise or something?

I ask because the dish array is not protruding out like the older version of the Enterprise on the left. It is sunk in like the USS Excelsior or the futuristic Sovereign Class Enterprise. I would say Sovereign Class all the way if the warp Nacelles were swept back instead of being mounted high like the older JJ Abrams Enterprise.

keg in kc 04-16-2013 02:31 PM

That looks pretty awesome.

Deberg_1990 04-16-2013 02:33 PM

Spoiler!

Hammock Parties 04-16-2013 03:04 PM

ermagehrd

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...59221113_n.jpg

Hammock Parties 04-16-2013 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9592599)
Spoiler!

What? No. There is still no mention of that.

Fish 04-16-2013 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592705)

Nice....... this opens up a whole new can of worms from the future....

Hammock Parties 04-16-2013 03:12 PM

I don't think the ship is from the future.

007 04-16-2013 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592725)
I don't think the ship is from the future.

It better not be. i would like to see them make a film without time travel. That is so overused and played out.

Jamie 04-16-2013 03:37 PM

That new ship is either about the size of the Enterprise-D, or much bigger, depending on how big you believe the Abrams Enterprise is. It'd be hilarious if "John Harrison" was a time traveling Jean-Luc Picard. I'm not saying it's likely, or even possible, but people would lose their shit (not in a good way).

Frazod 04-16-2013 03:45 PM

My first thought is that it belongs to some clandestine Star Fleet organization and the guy goes rogue. Sort of like in DS9 where the Obsidian Order had bigger and badder ships than the regular Cardassian fleet.

keg in kc 04-16-2013 05:00 PM

I'm going to go with same timeline, equivalent of Galaxy-class scale battleship.

Fish 04-16-2013 05:05 PM

I don't know why I thought future ship. It just looks darker and shaped differently, and had some kinda quad cannon weaponry that the crew seemed unaware and terrified of. :shrug:

Hammock Parties 04-16-2013 06:22 PM

My thoughts are it's not a Starfleet ship.

The guy is a rogue starfleet officer who goes off and builds his own ship somewhere. He uses his knowledge of starfleet technology to make the biggest, baddest most ****-you battle cruiser in the galaxy.

Deberg_1990 04-16-2013 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592719)
What? No. There is still no mention of that.

Post # 380


If u dare....


http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....&postcount=380

scorpio 04-16-2013 07:59 PM

it's not from the future. Don't click this if you don't want spoilers.

http://trekmovie.com/2013/04/16/exte...-at-cinemacon/

Sure-Oz 04-16-2013 08:43 PM

This, Man of Steel and Iron Man 3, hell ya

Deberg_1990 04-16-2013 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 9594124)
This, Man of Steel and Iron Man 3, hell ya

Going to be a much better lineup than last summers weak one.

I'll add Pacific Rim, Wolverine, Hangover III, Fast 6, Kick Ass 2, The Conjuring and Lone Ranger in there.

Sure-Oz 04-16-2013 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9594146)
Going to be a much better lineup than last summers weak one.

I'll add Pacific Rim, Wolverine, Hangover III, Fast 6, Kick Ass 2, The Conjuring and Lone Ranger in there.

Should be a fun summer for sure!

Buehler445 04-16-2013 08:54 PM

This looks ****ing amazing.

Deberg_1990 04-16-2013 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 9594159)
Should be a fun summer for sure!

Oh yea, and Elysium too.

Bowser 04-17-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9593075)
I'm going to go with same timeline, equivalent of Galaxy-class scale battleship.

Looks like an Ambassador class ship, like the one from the episode Yesterday's Enterprise.

Bowser 04-17-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592705)

http://en.academic.ru/pictures/enwik...Enterprise.jpg

Well, kind of....

Bowser 04-17-2013 10:33 AM

And just let me add my "Holy Shit" sentiment to the trailer....

Tribal Warfare 04-17-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9592771)
It better not be. i would like to see them make a film without time travel. That is so overused and played out.


I assume some how they obtained enough information off of Nero's ship to develop something to that scale.

Javabean 04-17-2013 11:18 AM

Nero's ship was sucked into a black hole. I don't think there's anything left of it.

Tribal Warfare 04-17-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Javabean (Post 9595438)
Nero's ship was sucked into a black hole. I don't think there's anything left of it.

their could've been a Klingon survivor ( distress call) that had this technology to use, and in the trailer Cumberbatch was kicking the shit out of a Klingon( FWIW).

Tribal Warfare 04-17-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592719)
What? No. There is still no mention of that.

I guess he's a Gary Mitchell variant and has returned to **** shit up.

bevischief 04-17-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9592725)
I don't think the ship is from the future.

This.

Bowser 04-17-2013 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9595415)
I assume some how they obtained enough information off of Nero's ship to develop something to that scale.

Maybe. Those green hues on the nacelles resemble Nero's Borg infused ship....

Hammock Parties 04-23-2013 01:31 PM

The name of the big ship is the USS Vengeance.

This is part of the ship:

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...70140826_n.jpg

Apparently there are more details if you download the Star Trek App.

http://www.startrekmovie.com/StarTrekApp/

keg in kc 04-23-2013 01:39 PM

Wasn't the original proposed title for the film Star Trek: Vengeance?

mikey23545 04-23-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9617314)
Wasn't the original proposed title for the film Star Trek: Vengeance?

No, no, no...It was to be called Star Trek VI : Return of the Romulans, where Spock and Uhura find out they are actually brother and sister, and the Federation, with the help of the Tribbles on their home planet, finally defeat Nero.

Tribal Warfare 04-23-2013 05:22 PM

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EYLZ9yECMJ0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hammock Parties 04-23-2013 08:24 PM

cod dayum

https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...57320768_n.jpg

Hammock Parties 04-23-2013 08:44 PM

hawt

http://www.lolzilla.net/images/11813748963991739407.jpg

Buck 04-29-2013 10:01 PM

So I haven't really paid any attention to this movie at all, haven't seen any trailers (don't see many since I cut the cord in February), and just today I found out that Benedict Cumberbatch plays the lead villain. That is so awesome. No wonder there was such a long break on Sherlock.

007 04-29-2013 11:58 PM

so you haven't seen all the previews right here in this thread? You under a rock or something?

007 04-29-2013 11:59 PM

Saw the 3D preview at Jurassic Park 3D. I will definitely be seeing this in 3D.

Buck 04-30-2013 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9645437)
so you haven't seen all the previews right here in this thread? You under a rock or something?

I haven't opened this thread in over 6 months.

007 04-30-2013 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 9645443)
I haven't opened this thread in over 6 months.

slacker

bevischief 05-03-2013 07:29 AM

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62238

Mr. Beaks Reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS!
(Apologies to the spoiler-sensitive, but I have no interest in writing about this movie without addressing its major reveals.)

Frazod 05-03-2013 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9654596)
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62238

Mr. Beaks Reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS!
(Apologies to the spoiler-sensitive, but I have no interest in writing about this movie without addressing its major reveals.)

I guess I'll hold off on reading this.

Bowser 05-03-2013 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9654648)
I guess I'll hold off on reading this.

Yup

keg in kc 05-03-2013 11:32 AM

Moriarty's review on hitfix is similar, albeit in a more positive tone than Beaks':
Quote:

If you consider "Star Trek Into Darkness" to be part thirteen of a larger franchise, you may walk away frustrated and tied in knots if the reactions I saw after a screening were any indication. Conversely, if this is part two of a new franchise in your mind, chances are you're going to have a great time with the continuation of what JJ Abrams and his collaborators began in 2009's "Star Trek." I find myself somewhere in the middle of those two camps, ultimately coming down on the side of the film as a pretty relentless piece of summer entertainment, anchored by what I consider one of the most exciting movie star performances in recent memory. I think they make some missteps in trying to service every "Trek" fan equally, but not insurmountably.
...
What lies ahead for "Star Trek" is unwritten and exciting, and this cast is primed to do amazing things if the material is there. I want more of these movies. I want more of these characters. "Star Trek Into Darkness" is a sober, aggressively-entertaining exploration of some of the richest characters in all of pop science-fiction, and it should cement this as one of the most potentially thrilling series running.

Deberg_1990 05-03-2013 03:40 PM

I think we all know what the spoiler is.

Frazod 05-03-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9655459)
I think we all know what the spoiler is.

Yep. What has been read, cannot be unread. But I pretty much assumed that was the deal all along.

I expect from this movie what I got from the last one - dumbed down, Star Warsy Star Trek tricked out for the "ohhhhh shiny" crowd. Entertaining, but at the same time a sad reflection of the times.

And like the last one, Star Trek Lite is better than no Star Trek at all.

007 05-03-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9655459)
I think we all know what the spoiler is.

Kirk IS Kahn

Deberg_1990 05-03-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9655481)
Yep. What has been read, cannot be unread. But I pretty much assumed that was the deal all along.

I expect from this movie what I got from the last one - dumbed down, Star Warsy Star Trek tricked out for the "ohhhhh shiny" crowd. Entertaining, but at the same time a sad reflection of the times.

And like the last one, Star Trek Lite is better than no Star Trek at all.

Yea, pretty much. But i do think the casting was spot on, and they stayed focused on the Kirk/Spock/McCoy relationship.....they get it.

I still say that the original show had its fair share of action, and probably would have offered more, if it had not been constrained by budget. Of course, they were probably forced to write more "intellectual" scifi because of that.

Deberg_1990 05-03-2013 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9655483)
Kirk IS Kahn

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

007 05-03-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9655504)
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

couldn't even take the time to post a GIF? Fail.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/20309/kaaahn-o.gif

sd4chiefs 05-03-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9655459)
I think we all know what the spoiler is.

Spock dies but they bring him back to life in ST 13.

007 05-03-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sd4chiefs (Post 9655510)
Spock dies but they bring him back to life in ST 13.

At least it will only take 10 movies before they do the remake.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.