Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
(Post 11443593)
What if I told you it was actually the behavior of a team who spent the most money on a free agent WR this year and also gave decent deals to a mediocre ILB and backup OG, while they also re-signed their CB-turned-FS with one year of starting experience to a pretty good deal and traded a 5th rounder for Ben Grubbs and gave him an extension to save money in the short term? All of this while they knew what the market was for Rodney Hudson and still chose not to fork over the cash for either him or someone like Stefan Wisniewski.
What do you think that says about what they think of Eric Kush?
|
I'm late into this discussion, but this nicely sums up my feelings as well.
I've seen zero indication from the offseason activities that tell me they have questions about our starting C this year, and it's Eric Kush.
I won't be totally pissed if they take Erving, think he's got a great chance to be a great player. However, let's not get carried away with his prospects at RT, which I don't believe he's ever played, but I could easily be wrong, just haven't heard anything about that. What I have heard is here was much concern over his real prospects at LT, where he was showing some big holes in his game. And half a season moving to C, while he was impressive, doesn't give me huge confidence to take a C in the 1st round, which even a 4 year starter would be questionable value.
I'm down with BAA, which i have a suspicion may be DLine. Hoping it's a CB tho, jones or collins.
|