ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Star Trek 12 Gets Release Date (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221538)

DaneMcCloud 05-28-2013 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9714903)
Ah k...yea Bird seems like a pretty talented guy.

He's 55 years old and his resume is sick. He was Lucasfilm's first choice to direct Episode VII but he passed in order to complete his next film, Tomorrowland.

I'm sure at some point down the road, he'll direct a film in the Star Wars universe.

Setsuna 05-28-2013 10:32 PM

No words for that movie. Pure win, better than the first. Only thing is the reappearance of future Spak.

JD10367 05-29-2013 10:46 PM

The 13-day total is now $159.4M (vs. $158.6M for the 2009 film in the same amount of time). After 4 days it was slightly behind the '09 entry, then a few days ago it caught up, now it's passed it. Worldwide it's now at $261M.

Discuss Thrower 06-01-2013 12:32 AM

I enjoyed it a lot more than 2009. Sure, it had predictable moments but sometimes it's about the journey and not the destination. I'm surprised about how many callbacks to "canon" Trek were made in the flick though.

Hopefully there's a final movie to wrap things up to a degree.

ThaVirus 06-01-2013 01:36 AM

I thought it was pretty good. I don't know shit about the Star Trek mythos, but Khan is a ****ing beast.

Spock was giving him that work though. Had his ass on his knees screaming with that five finger Vulcan shoulder death grip thing LMAO I laughed at that part.

Hammock Parties 06-01-2013 09:59 PM

Yep. Abrams basically has no original thought of his own.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HeyLm-pLVm4?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bowser 06-02-2013 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls (Post 9724528)
Yep. Abrams basically has no original thought of his own.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HeyLm-pLVm4?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

LMAO Red Letter is the shit.

But to be completely fair, Plinkett hasn't liked ANY of the Trek films, save the very first one from '79 ('78?).

Deberg_1990 06-02-2013 06:20 PM

So after 18 days in release.... 181 milly.


http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=startrek12.htm

Frazod 06-02-2013 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9725611)
LMAO Red Letter is the shit.

But to be completely fair, Plinkett hasn't liked ANY of the Trek films, save the very first one from '79 ('78?).

He didn't review the original crew movies, although he has spoken favorably about elements of II and VI in other reviews. He didn't like any of the NG films, and was even hard on the only truly good one, First Contact (although he did raise some excellent points that I hadn't considered before).

He did like the 2009 movie.

Hammock Parties 06-02-2013 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9725704)
He did like the 2009 movie.

He slammed it.

Silock 06-07-2013 05:42 AM

Why do I give a shit what he thinks? **** him. Star Trek the Motion Picture was AWFUL. Pure garbage. It only got better from there. The NG movies don't hold up particularly well, but I did like them when I saw them because of how much I missed Patrick Stewart.

Into Darkness was good. I was entertained. That's all I ask for.

Fire Me Boy! 06-07-2013 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 9735405)
Why do I give a shit what he thinks? **** him. Star Trek the Motion Picture was AWFUL. Pure garbage. It only got better from there. The NG movies don't hold up particularly well, but I did like them when I saw them because of how much I missed Patrick Stewart.

Into Darkness was good. I was entertained. That's all I ask for.

Bull. Shit.

Just watched it a couple days ago. It's slow, but it's one of the best pure stories.

Silock 06-07-2013 05:57 AM

I just watched it on Blu Ray, because I got the set for my bday. It's far too long for the plot. It's like they tried to make an episode into a film and had to figure out a bunch of shit to make it longer. So you end up with serious pacing problems and the camera just lingering on people for no reason.

007 06-07-2013 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 9735407)
Bull. Shit.

Just watched it a couple days ago. It's slow, but it's one of the best pure stories.

Absolutely this. I didn't care for it the first time I saw it in theaters but when I picked it up on DVD when I was older I loved it.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock (Post 9735414)
I just watched it on Blu Ray, because I got the set for my bday. It's far too long for the plot. It's like they tried to make an episode into a film and had to figure out a bunch of shit to make it longer. So you end up with serious pacing problems and the camera just lingering on people for no reason.

It's so much cooler when you realize that V'ger visited the home world of the Borg, which in turn, made them become what they became a few hundred years after its visit.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.