ChiefsPlanet
Page 51 of 60 « First 4147484950 51 52535455 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Thoughts on Pre-Season Game #1 (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262261)

Hammock Parties 08-16-2012 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 8821525)
Dane said no such thing.
Someone did.

I'm pretty sure Dane said 11-5 or something, and that's a stretch to me. It definitely errs on the side of homer.

This is a 10-6 team, tops, if every bounce of the ball goes our way.

In the end I'm taking a lot of shit for predicting 8-8. LMAO

Sorter 08-16-2012 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8821523)
It's pretty homerish to say we're gonna be in the AFCC.
Not when you had Joe Flacco in it last year, relying on his D to beat a 5th round draft pick. Or when you had Alex Smith beating the Saints.

DaneMcCloud 08-16-2012 12:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8821527)
Are people still underselling Atlanta? :facepalm:

They only appear to be mediocre because they play in a shit rape division in the NFC, which at this moment DWARFS the AFC in terms of quality teams and talent.

Sorry they're not fearsome to you. They only had to play the eventual Super Bowl champions two years in a row. And both of those Super Bowl teams had QBs who put up ****ing unbelievable games. Works of art, really.

But much like Marty's Chiefs of the 90s, I wouldn't want to play those assholes during the regular season.
I think they're mediocre. If they weren't mediocre, they'd have won a playoff game or two.

I'm sorry but the "competition" argument is bullshit. Win or go the **** home.

Sorter 08-16-2012 12:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8821528)
Someone did.

I'm pretty sure Dane said 11-5 or something, and that's a stretch to me. It definitely errs on the side of homer.

This is a 10-6 team, tops, if every bounce of the ball goes our way.

In the end I'm taking a lot of shit for predicting 8-8. LMAO
I don't think 8-8 is unreasonable. I think that we could potentially end up anywhere from 11-5 to 7-9. I choose to be more optimistic and think we'll end up 10-6.

Sorter 08-16-2012 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8821527)
Are people still underselling Atlanta? :facepalm:

They only appear to be mediocre because they play in a shit rape division in the NFC, which at this moment DWARFS the AFC in terms of quality teams and talent.

Sorry they're not fearsome to you. They only had to play the eventual Super Bowl champions two years in a row. And both of those Super Bowl teams had QBs who put up ****ing unbelievable games. Works of art, really.

But much like Marty's Chiefs of the 90s, I wouldn't want to play those assholes during the regular season.
I said this in a thread a while ago, but Atl has lost to SB participants in their playoff losses. They are a very good team. However, I feel that we match up well against them.

DaneMcCloud 08-16-2012 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8821528)
Someone did.

I'm pretty sure Dane said 11-5 or something, and that's a stretch to me. It definitely errs on the side of homer.

This is a 10-6 team, tops, if every bounce of the ball goes our way.

In the end I'm taking a lot of shit for predicting 8-8. LMAO
You can shove your dick up your ass if you think I've suddenly become a "homer".

I'm calling it as I see it, just like I ALWAYS have and will continue to do.

BossChief 08-16-2012 12:43 AM
Dane, your take on each qbs play from ps game 1?

DaneMcCloud 08-16-2012 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8821534)
I said this in a thread a while ago, but Atl has lost to SB participants in their playoff losses. They are a very good team. However, I feel that we match up well against them.
So did many of the 90's Chiefs teams.

Atlanta is who dey is until proven otherwise.

Hammock Parties 08-16-2012 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8821536)
You can shove your dick up your ass if you think I've suddenly become a "homer".

I'm calling it as I see it, just like I ALWAYS have and will continue to do.
Carrying the flag for Herm and Thigpen is pretty homer, dude.

Not even I did that and I was a huge homer back in those days.

Fortunately you seem to recognize when idiots are running things so I imagine your switch will flip pretty quickly when things go south.

DaneMcCloud 08-16-2012 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8821538)
Dane, your take on each qbs play from ps game 1?
I'm still watching but Cassel was impressive. He moved the chains, although the second play of the game scared me because he looked like 2009 Cassel. Since that point, he's looked sharp.

He'll never be Dan Marino but maybe he can be Rich Gannon.

BossChief 08-16-2012 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8821540)
Carrying the flag for Herm and Thigpen is pretty homer, dude.

Not even I did that and I was a huge homer back in those days.

Fortunately you seem to recognize when idiots are running things so I imagine your switch will flip pretty quickly when things go south.
Man, that's rich.

aturnis 08-16-2012 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8821527)
Are people still underselling Atlanta? :facepalm:

They only appear to be mediocre because they play in a shit rape division in the NFC, which at this moment DWARFS the AFC in terms of quality teams and talent.

Sorry they're not fearsome to you. They only had to play the eventual Super Bowl champions two years in a row. And both of those Super Bowl teams had QBs who put up ****ing unbelievable games. Works of art, really.

But much like Marty's Chiefs of the 90s, I wouldn't want to play those assholes during the regular season.
They lost to some shit teams last year and barely beat other shit teams. They don't play to their potential.

Hammock Parties 08-16-2012 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8821539)
Atlanta is who dey is until proven otherwise.
Not even sure what this means, but winning 43 games in 4 years under the same HC and QB is pretty god damn impressive.

Chiefs haven't done that in a loooong time.

So us walking around like that's a weak team and someone we're gonna smack down at the mighty Arrowhead, host to Tim Tebow's fourth miracle, is a bit of wishful thinking, no?

Let's wait until Casshole completes at least one more pass past 15 yards before we start swinging our dicks around.

DaneMcCloud 08-16-2012 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8821540)
Carrying the flag for Herm and Thigpen is pretty homer, dude.

Not even I did that and I was a huge homer back in those days.

Fortunately you seem to recognize when idiots are running things so I imagine your switch will flip pretty quickly when things go south.
No

RealSNR 08-16-2012 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8821530)
I think they're mediocre. If they weren't mediocre, they'd have on a playoff game or two.

I'm sorry but the "competition" argument is bullshit. Win or go the **** home.
I'll keep that in mind if we play them in the Super Bowl this year.

In the meantime, Atlanta is very tough during the regular season. They are favored to win that game, and rightfully so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 PM.
Page 51 of 60 « First 4147484950 51 52535455 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.