ChiefsPlanet - Football Costas: Redskins 'an insult, a slur'

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Costas: Redskins 'an insult, a slur' (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=277422)

Quote:

Originally Posted by The God Hypothesis (Post 10688423)

I guess you've never heard a rap song with the N word thrown around. Anecdotal evidence doesn't prove anything anyway.

All that matters IMO is why we're they named the Redskins, to honor Native Americans or to racially attack them. Learn the root meaning, and then proceed forward.

So the young man has no right to choose his affiliation and interpretation in the matter? He can get that decided for him? What a great ****ing country!

Here's the article previously posted:

Quote:

The Richmond Times-Dispatch reached out to the chiefs of some of Virginia’s Indian tribes to gather some thoughts about the Redskins name and find out whether those tribes are offended by the name controversy that launched a thousand blog posts.

Robert Green, retired chief of the Patawomeck Tribe in Virginia, told the paper that he has no objection to the team’s name.

“It doesn’t bother me,” Green said. “About 98 percent of my tribe is Redskins fans, and it doesn’t offend them, either.”

Kevin Brown, chief of the Pamunkey Tribe of Virginia, said that his tribe generally feels the same way.

“I’m a Redskins fan, and I don’t think there’s any intention for (the nickname) to be derogatory. The majority of the people in my tribe don’t have a problem with it. There are a few who do, and we respect their feelings.”

Perhaps the most adamant on the issue was G. Anne Richardson, chief of Virginia’s Rappahannock Tribe, who may be more offended by the controversy than by the name itself.

“I don’t have an issue with it,” she said. “There are so many more issues that are important for the tribe than to waste time on what a team is called. We’re worried about real things, and I don’t consider that a real thing.

“We’re more worried about our kids being educated, our people housed, elder care and the survival of our culture. We’ve been in that survival mode for 400 years. We’re not worried about how some ball team is named.”

So, are these guys racists too? What's the Native American equivalent of "Uncle Tom"?

I won't claim to know a bunch of Native Americans, but when I was in college, a close friend was the president of the Native American Association on campus. They did tribal pow-wows and such. I hunted with his family on the Omaha Nation reservation. So, I don't have a huge sample to draw from, but I do have some knowledge of their general feelings on the matter.

Every last one of them were Redskins fans...

Quote:

Originally Posted by 505 Chief (Post 10688424)

So the young man has no right to choose his affiliation and interpretation in the matter? He can get that decided for him? What a great ****ing country!

I didn't articulate my point very well.

I'm saying just because Native Americans choose to have affiliation and even flaunt the skins flag doesn't make it a non issue.

The inception of the name IMO is what matters. What's the intended reason the team was named the Redskins?

As I understand it was to honor the owners mother who was Sioux, so I see no reason why 80 years later PC groups can demand a change in name because they didn't do their research.

However, if they were named as a racial **** you to Native Americans, they should change the damn name.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The God Hypothesis (Post 10688464)

Points taken.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10688410)

You can't ****ing figure out how Redskins is demeaning, disrespectful, and disgraceful in some way?

In SOME way?

It's all fine and dandy? Nothing whatsoever is wrong there?

I can figure out how it could be in the right context, but no, I can't figure out why it has to be in all contexts (or in the context of a team that embraces it proudly). So help me out.

If they change that name, you realize who's next, yes?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 505 Chief (Post 10688475)

If they change that name, you realize who's next, yes?

The Minnesota Vikings if the authentic Norwegian-Americans can get themselves organized!

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 10688485)

The Minnesota Vikings if the authentic Norwegian-Americans can get themselves organized!

LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aries Walker (Post 10688189)

And it wouldn't have helped a bit. Even if it kept the diseases at bay for a while, the cannons on the ships would have ensured that the white people landed. And after that, they wouldn't have wanted to talk a bit; it would have been worse.

I've read that there was a pretty substantial amount of Native Americans before disease and war wiped them out. They'd have had no idea of the impending doom and; therefore, no reason to unite.

.. So you're right. Their downfall was inevitable. Even if they did come together, the Europeans just had too much firepower.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 10688089)

Did you know the 2004 poll was also conducted by one of those evil universities in a leftist state? Should we throw that one out too?

Did you even read the polls? Do realize there is no mention of time frame or whereabouts of those surveyed in your 'recent' poll, right? They claim 400 were polled, yet the earlier poll took about a year to poll 768. Read the notes and acknowledgments - if you cannot see how obvious it is that the recent poll set out to prove a conclusion while the prior poll was an open minded poll, then you need IQ glasses.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco Polo (Post 10688264)

:stupid:

ROFLROFL

Just rejoice in the fact that the constant beating of the drum by the Injuns ROFLROFL will result in the further pussification of America.

Let's just hope it finally pushes them so far out of sight and mind that they just go away. Please God, just make them go away...

White supremacy still alive and well. White power!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 10688344)

You seem to be suffering from a lack of respect for context.

I invite you to attend your local powwow and give a speech in which you use the term 'redskin', in the context of your choice, and count how many in the audience are demeaned, disrespected, or disgraced.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10688509)

It wasn't the war; it was the disease. About 90% of the Native population was wiped out by the disease that Europeans carried, but had no control over or even knowledge of. Europeans had landed in North America by 1000 AD, or maybe even earlier, and it only took one to infect the entire continent.

They guys in this picture are living, breathing racial slurs.

http://www.heraldsun.com/archive/x14...a54a13834d.jpg