Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2003 we were the #2 seed.
|
Quote:
At a minimum CHunt is certainly left wondering WTF he let happen! Kraft just laughs and says, "stick around kid, you have a lot to learn about the game, and you just got gamed..." Maybe not... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
That being said, if you are going to credit Kraft for being smart enough to let BB do his thing, Clark did the same with Pioli. Just happens that BB isn't the idiot that Pioli is. Oh, and Tom Brady. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think kraft worked his ass off to become the owner of the pats -- he worked for that. clark? no. he has failed as an NFL owner also. so, there's that. |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Had he tried that, what would SP had been able to do, go to the union? |
How do you know what he ****ing hasdone behind closed doors?
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Kraft had nothing to do with Brady. Nor did Belichick or Pioli.
The guy who got the Pats Tom Brady was Dick Rehbein, their QBs coach, who gave Brady glowing reviews. |
When Clark took over, he wanted to totally change the culture, which was probably needed, but not to the extent that happened.
The culture that was going down, obviously wasn't working so Clark made a change, wholesale changes to the franchise from the top down. He could have stayed status quo and lined his pockets. But he didn't. |
Quote:
pioli wasn't here the last time a GM "pissed off the fans" but hey, there was a clark in the mix. how many more staff changes will it take before you get pissed at the ownership? I've already reached my threshold. clark is a crap owner in my book. he threw away the QB position with Matty C and in turn wasted years, he threw away the catalyst of positive change when he fired Haley and he is on board with the crapfest that is Scott Pioli, who is the engineer of this train wreck. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He didn't find immediate success. It took time, and the luck of stumbling onto an elite QB. |
Quote:
I am not using kraft as the standard, just one example. hell, this started with the whole JJ comparison. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
I don't have enough information to draw any conclusions, or to make any assumptions. What am arguing is the stupidity displayed by those that have argued that he's a bad owner. |
Quote:
yet, clark has his back. had his back during all the pissing contests, has been accused of being just as meddling and micro scrutinizing as piholi. I think it is justified. clark is a bad owner. he's more and more like mike brown imo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think our quick judgment of him being a bad owner is that he comes from a money grubbing family, and other than some large and visible changes he made at first (and I agreed with the SP hiring when it was made), his lack of prompt action seems to indicate that he's more of the same. I'm not sure SP uses the term f-year plan (It might be copyrighted!!), but CHunt's failure is seemingly letting things ride. Who knows, when the clock reads 0:00 at the end of game 16, he might tell security to help SP fill his one box of personal items from his former office. I would like that, but I'm not holding out hope, after all he is Lamar's son... |
The Hunts desperately want this franchise to be run like the Steelers.
It's an image thing when it comes to firing people, especially the GM, midseason. It's just not going to happen. I think it will happen at seasons end, but not during the season. |
Quote:
Until he does, or sells the team to a new owner, this will always be in question. |
my opinion is that clark will not fire pioli & RC will remain HC. he isn't going to tell you this. to me, that is bad. he is holding onto the fact most chiefs fans today can't tell the diff between matt cassel & matt stafford, plus there is a ton of corporate season ticket sales, so he is just gonna fade back to texas and you and I are going to be left staring a piholi & romeo. you watch.
|
Quote:
Although, I will say from some of the things I've heard, this season, coupled with last season has changed his view a little bit on how he wants be around etc. One good thing that could come from the previous events I guess. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for kraft and drafts etc, he had parcells in there during the nineties and a GM that was a bit stubborn, hence the famous parcells quote "if you want me to cook the meal, you ought to let me pick the groceries" and parcells left that team flush with talent. he made another key hire in BB and we all know what happened there. Clark has been around this team since birth. he was slow firing CP, now he's backing a GM that fired this team's best coach since Clark took over and do I have to go into the fact FA & coaching candidates are steering clear of KC & piholi? That is Clark's legacy so far. It's bad business, bad football. And, he's about to let it go another season. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) Takes over the Patriots during Parcells' tenure. 2) Parcells took the Pats from the #1 pick to a Super Bowl appearance. Kraft runs him off. 3) Parcells' impending departure becomes a major distraction during that Super Bowl. The Pats lose. 4) Parcells not only leaves, he goes to a division rival. 5) The Pats start getting worse every year after Parcells' departure. 6) Doesn't pay future HOFer Curtis Martin, allows him to go to a division rival in his prime. 7) Flirts with moving the Pats to the thriving NFL hotbed of Connecticut. 8) Trades a first-round pick to a division rival. 9) Trades that pick for Belichick, a move about as popular back then as someone trading a first-round pick for Norv Turner would be today. 10) Team wins 5 games, putting them back in the same basement they were in before Kraft took over. Now I'm not for sure, but up until the Patriots lucked into the best draft pick in NFL history, I don't think too many of their fans were pumping their fists about ol' self made Robert Kraft and his grand football IQ. |
I read this elsewhere than on the planet and have heard a lot of people talk about it. It would be fun to have seen the conversation
|
Quote:
Well, not really quite true -- Parcells became HC in 1993. He coached the team only one season previous to Kraft's buyout. Parcells remained HC under Kraft for 3 of his four seasons as HC of the Patriots. They did not get along though, so we agree there. Kraft made Pete Carroll the next HC and that was another fail. But it turns out they were all the right moves. And, again I think kraft has better football sense than clark does, which is kind of whacked considering clark's upbringing. I think you guys are trying too hard to tell me kraft made plenty of mistakes -- I am aware and my point is that he has the experience previous to his NFL ownership and that is a big big diff between the two men. Enough about Kraft. Tell me why Clark Hunt is going to enjoy any success as an NFL owner? Give me some accomplishments that haven't been obvious. Because the obvious accomplishments aren't much of an offset to the failure Clark has fielded season after season. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Time will tell. We can only wait.
|
Quote:
This all started with Chiefsforlife58 saying Clark couldn't be a good owner because football isn't his first love. I am not saying Clark knows more about football, I am just arguing that its the not the reason an owner does well. Kraft has done things right but none of them have to do with the x's and o's or personnel side. You have listed a lot of things Kraft has done right and I don't disagree. This was all about Chiefsforlife58's comment and yours saying Kraft's football IQ meant something. What Kraft has done right is staying out of the football side of things. If Clark is doomed it has nothing to do with his knowledge of the sport and everything to do with what he wants out of this franchise. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.