smithandrew051 |
05-19-2020 01:49 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
(Post 14979420)
Gimme whoever wins the holding competition.
And I'm serious. They're !@#$ing punters. Job #1 is just don't shank it. And yeah, ideally you keep it out of the end zone, but as you've noted, unless you're punting inside their territory, even the damage from a touchback isn't always that bad (and Colquitt had gotten really bad about punts downed at the 17; whoopee!).
There's likely going to be very little difference in their respective contributions as punters. If one guy is shanking every 5th punt for 15-20 yards, then you can't have that and the other wins by default. But if both guys are giving representative efforts, I couldn't care less about a 1 yard difference in season-long Net Punting Average.
At that point give me the guy that's gonna handle a low/high snap and get it down for Butker. Extra points aren't sure things anymore either so you gotta be able to get those down because at the new distance, the timing actually matters.
If the two guys are even close in terms of their punting performance, I'll take the slightly worse punter if he's a better holder.
|
I wasn’t referring to shanking, but rather being able to place the ball when punting into a short field.
For instance, would I rather have the punter with the big leg who can consistently flip the field? Or the punter who can’t flip the field but can consistently pin teams (ie not punt into the end zone) when punting into a short field?
With this offense, give me the guy who can flip the field and give my defense a better chance. We don’t need to create points through field position like the Alex Smith years.
4th and 5 or less from midfield or less in a competitive game: I’m going for it 100% of the time with Mahomes at QB. I don’t think the super accurate punter is as valuable to this team.
|