ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Quantum of Solace (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=196690)

Reaper16 11-15-2008 12:50 AM

If Brett Ratner were banned from making movies then the world wouldn't seem like such a bad place.

007 11-15-2008 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 5219995)
Mask was the first one and Legend was the second. Legend royally sucked.:shake:

How ironic. Legend is on TNT right now.

KcMizzou 11-15-2008 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5220069)
Yes, unfortunately.

Ratner's directing an "Origin" story and supposedly, they're gearing up for a trilogy.

I didn't hate X-Men 3 as much as some (there are FAR too many people in the X-Men universe to me, anyway) but I just can't see him making this happen.

I hope I'm wrong. But the biggest issue is who to cast as Conan? I sure as hell hope they go with a newcomer.

I'd hate to see Ed Norton or McConaughey as Conan.

Or Vin ****ing Diesel.

Agreed. I love the original "Conan"

The remake has "disaster" written all over it.

Braincase 11-15-2008 08:34 AM

Went to the 7:50 last night. I thought it was OK, tied up some loose ends and did a good job setting up SPECTRE's replacement organization.

The spastic camera work sucked during the action scenes. I enjoyed some of the chase seens in CR because they knew how to keep the camera still and take an occassional long shot. This movie's action shots are as watchable as The Blair Witch Project.

Judi Dench is the best M ever.

If Olga Kurylenko pulls up and tells me to "Get In", I'm really hoping she's not just talking about the car... but dammit Bond, you gotta tap that ass.

I need to rewatch CR, then go back and watch QoS again right afterwards. There were a couple of things I think I missed.

It's very reassuring to know that this is the last time the franchise will be using this director.

Deberg_1990 11-15-2008 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 5220341)
It's very reassuring to know that this is the last time the franchise will be using this director.

Marc Forster did this one. His background is in indie flicks. I also believe hes the first American director to helm a Bond flick??


Martin Campbel did CR. Hes actually been the best of the modern Bond directors. He also rebooted the Bond franchise in the mid 90's with Goldeneye.

Ironically he also made both Zorro flicks since it came up in this thread.

Fire Me Boy! 11-15-2008 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase (Post 5220341)
The spastic camera work sucked during the action scenes. I enjoyed some of the chase seens in CR because they knew how to keep the camera still and take an occassional long shot. This movie's action shots are as watchable as The Blair Witch Project.

I agree. Director of CR did a better job with the action. I typically don't like it, but the spastic camera work doesn't necessarily bother me. 95 percent of the action in this one I couldn't tell what was going on, who grabbed what... that's to the detriment of the film.

Quote:

If Olga Kurylenko pulls up and tells me to "Get In", I'm really hoping she's not just talking about the car... but dammit Bond, you gotta tap that ass.
I actually preferred Gemma Arterton (the girl who played Strawberry Fields). :drool:

mikeyis4dcats. 11-16-2008 01:06 PM

So is Martin Campbell done with Bond movies? Why did they go to Forster?

Deberg_1990 11-16-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5223167)
So is Martin Campbell done with Bond movies? Why did they go to Forster?

Who knows?? I jst saw it. Yea, it was obvious they were going for the "Bourne" feel with the spastic camerawork during the action scenes.


I liked the movie, but overall it was kind of flat. I actually liked the quiet character scenes better than the action scenes.

mikeyis4dcats. 11-16-2008 01:56 PM

it was definitely more to my liking than the old Bond movies, although I still watch them if I run across them on tv.

Casino Royale was great though, so you have to wonder why they changed the team.

mikeyis4dcats. 11-16-2008 01:56 PM

and Strawberry Fields...

god what I'd do to her....

Baby Lee 11-16-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5219976)
Plus, I really really liked the girl who played Marlena.

Watch True Blood and you get to see her bewbies!!

Fire Me Boy! 11-16-2008 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5223351)
Who knows?? I jst saw it. Yea, it was obvious they were going for the "Bourne" feel with the spastic camerawork during the action scenes.


I liked the movie, but overall it was kind of flat. I actually liked the quiet character scenes better than the action scenes.

Me too. Significantly better.

Fire Me Boy! 11-16-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 5223527)
and Strawberry Fields...

god what I'd do to her....

Gemma Arterton... I mentioned her a bit earlier, and I agree 1000 percent.

Ebolapox 11-16-2008 09:08 PM

saw it today. great flick

T-post Tom 11-16-2008 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5218289)
I'm planning on seeing this tomorrow.

From what I've read of the reviews, most complaints surround the critics missing the gadget-laden, martini-sipping, lounge lizard Bond, and lamenting the new, cold, rip your throat out with sneer Bond.

Well, I never gave a crap about the old Bond. Casino Royale (the new one) is the only Bond DVD I ever actually purchased. Glib British snobs with gadgets was never, shall we say, my cup of tea. I like the new guy.

The "new" Bond that you described is the Bond the Ian Fleming created. The movie producers hijacked the original Bond and replaced him with the Roger Moore concoction that you aptly described. I like Fleming's original Bond.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.