Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9078351)

Man, that's tight.

To me, if I'm assigning them all grades from 1-100, I think I give the lowest score to Daboll.

Pioli has at least managed to make his boss money. As a football personnel person, he's complete trash. As a General Manager, he has managed to not lose money for his boss. By God he's tried with the Cassel and Jackson deals, but he still hasn't pulled it off. Pioli gets a 20/100.

Crennel...!@#$ man, I don't know how I can give him very many points but what he has at least avoided is an outright mutiny. The guys don't play hard for him, but they don't appear to hate him either. And at times the defensive side of the ball does look halfway decent (afterall, yesterday the D still only gave up 17 points). I give Crennel a 25. He gets a slightly higher score than Pioli just because of the fact that Pioli loses a half point for every point Crennel loses by virtue of voluntarily employing him.

Cassel. I can't even gear myself up to talk about him. Sometimes he runs well and he's not always complete trash when the game is out of hand. He gets a 30/100.

Daboll...these guys are just a complete waste on offense. Even if Cassel were decent, these schemes are predictable as hell and there aren't adjustments made ever. He doesn't work to anyone's strengths and hasn't shown an ability to even determine what those might be. Moreover, he's a prick. Everyone seems to hate this asshole. Nobody wants to work with him and he's awful at the side of the ball he's responsible for. As near as I can tell there is absolutely nothing redeeming about Brian Daboll. He gets a 5/100 because he's shown up to each game by kickoff. That's all I can come up with.

Daboll wins this one. In a vacuum, he's worse at his job than anyone else here is at theirs. He simply does nothing well. Ever.