Quote:
They're the same douchebags that would have opposed the SOC Blackout. "You don't know any better, quit acting like you do, etc." |
Quote:
|
Get Percy Harvin.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The position NEEDS to be addressed. You don't trade a 3rd rounder for a receiver IF you have three receivers under contract. As a matter of fact, the Chiefs shouldn't trade for a receiver, period. Too many needs at other positions. Quote:
|
Quote:
No. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Curious your feelings on any free agent spending this offseason? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they switch to the 4-3, which I think would be a major setback considering the Chiefs have three linebackers in place to effectively run the 3-4, they can address that position in free agency. There's no reason to spend a 2nd rounder on a DE, period. Especially when they need a starting safety, ILB, two QB's and depth nearly everywhere. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What are you guys thoughts on Margus Hunt with one of our 3rd rounders if he's there?
I figure if we stay in the 34, Jackson will be restructured and brought back. Atleast for depth. |
Quote:
The Senior Bowl and Combines will provide some information. The first few days of Free Agency will provide some direction. But until the Chiefs name their offensive and defensive coordinators and begin to assess the roster, it's silly, IMO, to attempt to address anything with a hypothetical. And JFC, I forgot: CB is a MUCH more important need than DE, even if the Chiefs lose Dorsey and Jackson. FTR, Dorsey can go. Jackson can come back at a reasonable salary. If not, **** 'em both. |
Quote:
Seems you are hoping we keep the 34? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.