ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.**** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255691)

Codered 06-15-2012 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8681021)

You live in Kansas and root for Missouri teams.

You're starting off weak today Saul.

This just makes him one of the smart ones.

Bambi 06-15-2012 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codered (Post 8681076)
This just makes him one of the smart ones.

Believe me, if I lived in the area obviously I would live in Kansas too.

Saul Good 06-15-2012 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8681081)
Believe me, if I lived in the area obviously I would live in Kansas too.

I would totally live in Kansas if I didn't move 1500 miles away to live in New Jersey. /Wickedson

Bambi 06-15-2012 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8681096)
I would totally live in Kansas if I didn't move 1500 miles away to live in New Jersey. /Wickedson

Why do you keep saying I live in New Jersey?

I don't get it. Am I missing something? Is it supposed to be funny?

Saul Good 06-15-2012 10:01 AM

Clemson just landed the top football recruit in the country.

Codered 06-15-2012 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8681213)
Clemson just landed the top football recruit in the country.

They are still a shit school.

/Wickedson

tredadda 06-15-2012 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codered (Post 8681232)
They are still a shit school.

/Wickedson

Only because they don't want the Big 12. If the did then they would be one of the nation's elite programs. Or this is how it is in Wickedson's world.

Bambi 06-15-2012 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codered (Post 8681232)
They are still a shit school.

/Wickedson

Clemson has had great recruiting classes for years.

Many schools get big time recruits and they still don't win.

DeezNutz 06-15-2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8681213)
Clemson just landed the top football recruit in the country.

****. DGB transferred?

Bambi 06-15-2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8681589)
****. DGB transferred?

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...emdiche-113275

Bowser 06-15-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8681002)
Professional Sports seems to be the point of emphasis for every other region in the country.

We're all good at our own thing I suppose.

LMAO

Frazod 06-15-2012 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8681595)
LMAO

Yeah, it's not like 95% of his posts are about college sports or anything. ROFL

Pasta Little Brioni 06-15-2012 05:01 PM

We don't need to make him look foolish...he does it to himself ROFL Ah well it sure is fun.

Titty Meat 06-15-2012 10:08 PM

Hey look Nebraska being a Jr member has really hurt them. http://board.huskerhoopscentral.com/...topic=49595642

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

baitism 06-16-2012 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8682530)
Hey look Nebraska being a Jr member has really hurt them. http://board.huskerhoopscentral.com/...topic=49595642

Nebraska has a basketball board? Do people actually go there?

Titty Meat 06-16-2012 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baitism (Post 8682791)
Nebraska has a basketball board? Do people actually go there?

More people post there than go to mizzou bowl games apparently.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

mnchiefsguy 06-16-2012 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8682810)
More people post there than go to mizzou bowl games apparently.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

NU being a junior member sure gets your panties in a wad, doesn't it?

Pasta Little Brioni 06-16-2012 12:06 PM

He's just conflicted on if he wants to grow up to be a legend or a leader.

Titty Meat 06-16-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8682962)
NU being a junior member sure gets your panties in a wad, doesn't it?

Nebraskas better facilities have yours in a bunch.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Bowser 06-16-2012 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8683080)
Nebraskas better facilities have yours in a bunch.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

I will say this - Nebraska is going to have a pretty badass women's volleyball/wrestling venue (they'll share). They're taking the old basketball facilities and upgrading them for volleyball/wrestling. It looks like it will be really nice when it's all done.

And yes, Wickedson, people do follow those college sports.

ArrowheadHawk 06-16-2012 03:08 PM

Is there any alignment news?

Sassy Squatch 06-16-2012 03:25 PM

Nope. Still just one big dick measurin contest. Probably won't be any till July.

Titty Meat 06-16-2012 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 8683199)
I will say this - Nebraska is going to have a pretty badass women's volleyball/wrestling venue (they'll share). They're taking the old basketball facilities and upgrading them for volleyball/wrestling. It looks like it will be really nice when it's all done.

And yes, Wickedson, people do follow those college sports.

I like you so I'll shy away from flaming you for following volleyball and wrestling :)

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

ArrowheadHawk 06-16-2012 06:50 PM

Wrestling = NO
https://encrypted-tbn2.google.com/im...6H4nTMBpGrXvkw
Volleyball = YES
http://soletron.com/blog/wp-content/...4209217-12.jpg

Bambi 06-16-2012 07:15 PM

Jesus

Titty Meat 06-16-2012 09:13 PM

Yeah gonna have to watch volleyball now.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

eazyb81 06-18-2012 02:34 PM

Wait, so who's the anchor?

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextr...4339&rss_lnk=2

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
Quote:

In Palo Alto, Bowlsby never thought he would lead the Big 12 into a prosperous future. Especially after last summer, when he met with Hargis (OSU prez), Texas president Bill Powers, Kansas State president Kirk Schulz and Oklahoma AD Joe Castiglione about those schools and others joining the Pac-12.





tredadda 06-18-2012 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8686461)
Wait, so who's the anchor?

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextr...4339&rss_lnk=2

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->





Typo possibly?

WilliamTheIrish 06-18-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8686472)
Typo possibly?

I think the NCAA may force KU to vacate the 2011 "We Had Options" championship.

|Zach| 06-18-2012 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 8687361)
I think the NCAA may force KU to vacate the 2011 "We Had Options" championship.

Ok, I laughed.

tredadda 06-18-2012 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 8687361)
I think the NCAA may force KU to vacate the 2011 "We Had Options" championship.

KU was too busy trying to get back to a BCS game to care about the PAC-12. They had other priorities like winning championships. That is why they didn't include KU in the talks- Wickedson

Bambi 06-19-2012 08:03 AM

Good to see MU still can't quit us.

qabbaan 06-19-2012 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 8687361)
I think the NCAA may force KU to vacate the 2011 "We Had Options" championship.

ROFL

Bambi 06-19-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 8687361)
I think the NCAA may force KU to vacate the 2011 "We Had Options" championship.

Don't blame KU...

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews....-to-pac-1.html

DaKCMan AP 06-20-2012 10:05 AM

Quote:

Is SEC already boosting Mizzou, Texas A&M?

Steve Megargee
National College Columnist

The answer seems obvious.

Texas A&M and Missouri have a reasonable shot at assembling their highest-ranked recruiting classes since the current version of Rivals.com formed in 2002, just as each school prepares for its inaugural season in the Southeastern Conference.

Membership in the conference that has produced the last six national champions is clearly the reason why each school is recruiting so well, right?

"Everybody wants to be in the SEC," said Southlake (Texas) Carroll dual-threat quarterback Kenny Hill, a Texas A&M verbal commitment and the No. 178 overall prospect in the Class of 2013.

Well, that's certainly part of it. But it doesn't quite tell the whole story.

As much as Hill touted Texas A&M's membership in the SEC, he also credited the hiring of Kevin Sumlin as a major reason for his decision. Plenty of other Texas A&M recruits also have said the new coaching staff was every bit as much of a factor in their decision as the possibility of playing in the SEC.

While Texas A&M is benefiting from a coaching change, Missouri is capitalizing on momentum.

"The talent is deeper in the state of Missouri than I've ever seen," Rivals.com Midlands recruiting analyst Brian Perroni said. "They have a ton of in-state pledges. That's a big thing that's helping them. I'm sure the SEC angle is helping as well, but the in-state talent is the big reason for their high ranking right now."

As of Wednesday morning, Texas A&M was fourth in the Rivals.com 2013 team recruiting rankings with verbal commitments from 20 players, including nine four-star recruits. Missouri was 17th and had commitments from 13 players, including three four-star prospects.

Texas A&M's top finish ever in the Rivals recruiting rankings was eighth in 2005. Missouri has ranked in the top 25 just twice, including a best-ever 21st-place finish in 2010.

The recruiting upgrades are absolutely essential as each team gets ready for the SEC. Consider that two of the three teams ahead of Texas A&M in the 2013 recruiting rankings are SEC rivals Alabama (No. 2) and Florida (No. 3). Missouri's current No. 17 position places the Tigers ninth out of 14 SEC programs. Arkansas and Kentucky are the lone SEC schools outside the top 25.

"Right now things are going as well as they've [ever] gone for us in recruiting," Missouri coach Gary Pinkel said. "The SEC has played a huge part in that. There are other factors, too, for us."

Pinkel cited Missouri's graduation rate and recent success on the field as other factors. Missouri generally ranked at or near the top of the Big 12 in football graduation rates, and the Tigers have won at least eight games each of the last six seasons.

Texas A&M, on the other hand, is coming off a 7-6 season that resulted in the firing of Mike Sherman. That hasn't stopped Sumlin's staff from winning over recruits, even ones who never expected to play for the Aggies.

"A year ago, I didn't see myself committing to Texas A&M," Dallas (Texas) Bishop Dunne offensive guard and Rivals250 prospect Ishmael Wilson said. "It surprised me as much as it did everyone else."

Wilson originally wanted to play away from his home state and had his eye on the SEC. Then he started thinking about how it would be tough for his mom to see him play if he lived so far away. Texas A&M's move to the SEC provided the best possible scenario,
as Wilson would get the chance to face the nation's best competition while his mother would have an easier time watching his games.

But he still might not have picked Texas A&M if Sumlin hadn't taken over the program. Wilson appreciated Sumlin's straightforward approach and liked the idea of playing for him.

"If Coach Sumlin wasn't there, I doubt I would have committed," Wilson said. "And if they weren't in the SEC, I doubt I would have committed."

Other Texas A&M recruits also mentioned the importance of the new coaching staff.

Texas A&M hired Sumlin away from Houston, which went 13-1 and set FBS team records in total offense and passing yards last season. Hill said Sumlin's pass-oriented offenses appealed to recruits, and Texas A&M's class does indeed include two four-star quarterbacks (Hill and Kohl Stewart) and three receivers (Derrick Griffin, Laquvionte Gonzalez and Quincy Adeboyejo). Griffin, the nation's No. 2 wide receiver and No. 25 overall prospect, is the highest-rated recruit in Texas A&M's class.

Dallas (Texas) Jesuit offensive tackle J.J. Gustafson said he developed a quick rapport with Sumlin's staff and got the sense they wouldn't lie to him. He also pointed out that those coaches mentioned the benefits of joining the nation's toughest conference, but they didn't get carried away in discussing the SEC angle when making their pitch to recruits.

"They obviously have 'SEC' embroidered on everything and it's hanging up everywhere," Gustafson said, "but the coaching staff as a whole didn't really talk about it a whole lot."

A look at the Texas A&M and Missouri classes shows the two schools haven't necessarily expanded their geographic reach since joining the SEC. They're just doing a better job of protecting their base.

Texas A&M landed a commitment last week from Rivals250 cornerback Noel Ellis of New Orleans (La.) Edna Karr, who told AggieYell.com afterward that he'd always wanted to play in the SEC. But he's the only non-Texan in the Aggies' entire 2013 class.

Missouri doesn't have a single 2013 commitment from a traditional SEC state, but the move to the SEC has helped the Tigers fare better with in-state recruits.

The surge started on National Signing Day when the Class of 2012's No. 1 recruit -- Springfield (Mo.) Hillcrest wide receiver Dorial Green-Beckham -- chose Missouri over Arkansas. In the Class of 2013, five of the state's top six committed prospects have chosen Missouri.

"The guys I've talked to who are going to Missouri, we all want the same thing," St. Peters (Mo.) Fort Zumwalt South athlete and Rivals250 recruit Chase Abbington said. "We want everybody to stay home, have a big career at Missouri and hopefully win the national championship, which we have a chance of doing with the guys we have coming in.''

To take the next step, Missouri probably will need to land some quality players from traditional SEC states.

But landing most of the nation's top in-state recruits is a pretty nice start.

"There's no question about it," Pinkel said. "Kids now in the state of Missouri, this part of the country and Big Ten country like Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska, those kids have great respect for the SEC. Our location puts them in a position where they have a chance to play in the SEC and get a chance to compete. That's a real positive for us.

"There's no question in the state of Missouri and the surrounding areas, the SEC has been tremendously positive -- the stability, the winning, all that goes with the SEC and the respect that they have,'' Pinkel said. "We're just getting into the Southeast recruiting. We signed a couple of kids out of Florida [in 2012]. We're going to get into Atlanta, get into south Georgia and things like that. We will eventually put a footprint in there."

Maybe that will happen with Texas A&M as well.

For now, the Aggies are just doing fine, putting together a recruiting class comprised almost entirely of Texans. Although seven of the top eight committed prospects from the Lone Star State chose Texas instead of Texas A&M, there's plenty of talent in the state to go around.

And many of those other recruits are intrigued by the Aggies' coaching change and conference switch.

"Anytime there's a new staff, there's always excitement over the unknown," Perroni said. "New staff. New conference. There's a buzz."

Which of those new elements has proved more beneficial in luring recruits? That's up for debate.

"I think it's both," Gustafson said. "I know that everybody loves the coaches. Coach Sumlin really put together a great group of guys. Everybody loves the coaches. But also, all the commits committed because of the SEC. Everyone I know that I've talked to, they want to play the best, same as I do.

"I think the combination just sold it for me. I can't imagine a better place for me."
http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com...sp?CID=1377313

REACHING NEW HEIGHTS

The 2013 team recruiting rankings suggest Texas A&M and Missouri are both benefiting from their move to the SEC. Here's a look at each team's current ranking and where both have finished in the team recruiting rankings each year since 2005.

Code:

Year        Missouri Texas A&M
2005        39th        8th
2006        47th        26th
2007        33rd        43rd
2008        25th        16th
2009        40th        22nd
2010        21st        17th
2011        48th        27th
2012        31st        15th
2013        17th        4th


IN A LEAGUE OF THEIR OWN

Texas A&M and Missouri need to assemble outstanding recruiting classes simply to keep pace in the SEC, which has 12 of the top 25 teams in the class of 2013 team recruiting rankings. Here's a look at each SEC team's national recruiting ranking for 2013 as of Wednesday morning.

Code:

School        Rank
Alabama                        2
Florida                        3
Texas A&M                4
Georgia                        5
LSU                        7
Auburn                        11
South Carolina                12
Vanderbilt                16
Missouri                18
Ole Miss                19
Tennessee                22
Mississippi State        24
Arkansas                T-44
Kentucky                NR*

* - The Rivals.com team recruiting rankings only go through 50. Kentucky isn't one of the top 50 teams.

Setsuna 06-20-2012 10:08 AM

Well that was obvious to everyone already in the SEC that recruiting would be boosted.

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8690731)
Well that was obvious to everyone already in the SEC that recruiting would be boosted.

Neither Texas nor Oklahoma were interested in either of the guys mentioned in the article.

Just sayin.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690743)
Neither Texas nor Oklahoma were interested in either of the guys mentioned in the article.

Just sayin.

Link?

Also, "either" implies that there were only two players mentioned. There were more than two.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690743)
Neither Texas nor Oklahoma were interested in either of the guys mentioned in the article.

Just sayin.

In case anyone doesn't think you're full of shit, JJ Gustafson was offered by Oklahoma.

Setsuna 06-20-2012 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690765)
In case anyone doesn't think you're full of shit, JJ Gustafson was offered by Oklahoma.

Damn. I almost took what Wicked said as valid. Thanks for helping me dodge that bullet. :D

tredadda 06-20-2012 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8690770)
Damn. I almost took what Wicked said as valid. Thanks for helping me dodge that bullet. :D

Never do that. Never go full reerun and believe anything he says as valid.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:29 AM

DGB: offers from Texas and Oklahoma

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690755)
Link?

Also, "either" implies that there were only two players mentioned. There were more than two.

I was just mentioning the bolded players.

Did a bit more looking.

None of the A&M commitments listed in the article so far that I searched were offered by Texas. Think there are 5 or 6 names mentioned there.

Butthurt maybe but who knows.

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690781)
DGB: offers from Texas and Oklahoma

DGB isn't in this article trying to bad mouth the Big 12, he's smarter than that.

All the players saying "look the SEC is where everyone wants to go"...

didn't get offered by Texas. That's the point.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690794)
DGB isn't in this article trying to bad mouth the Big 12, he's smarter than that.

All the players saying "look the SEC is where everyone wants to go"...

didn't get offered by Texas. That's the point.

Show me a link showing that Texas wasn't interested in them.
Thanks

Discuss Thrower 06-20-2012 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690794)
DGB isn't in this article trying to bad mouth the Big 12, he's smarter than that.

All the players saying "look the SEC is where everyone wants to go"...

didn't get offered by Texas. That's the point.

You're joking, right?

Codered 06-20-2012 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690787)
I was just mentioning the bolded players.

Did a bit more looking.

None of the A&M commitments listed in the article so far that I searched were offered by Texas. Think there are 5 or 6 names mentioned there.

Butthurt maybe but who knows.

KU fan ready to give Texas a handjob as usual.

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690799)
Show me a link showing that Texas wasn't interested in them.
Thanks

google yourself and go to Rivals. All there.

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 8690805)
You're joking, right?

About what?

Not one Texas A&M recruit received a Texas over.

No wonder the school ran from the league.

http://tamu.rivals.com/

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690811)
google yourself and go to Rivals. All there.

I did just that. Funny thing about Rivals...they only show what schools the players are interested in rather than schools that were interested in the player. These players had no interest in Texas, but there is nothing indicating whether or not Texas was interested in them.

I mean, DGB wasn't interested in playing at Idaho State, but I'm sure they would have offered him a scholarship if he wanted to play there.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690821)
About what?

Not one Texas A&M recruit received a Texas over.

No wonder the school ran from the league.

http://tamu.rivals.com/

According to Rivals, aTm has the fourth best class in the country for 2013...better than Texas. Any more dumb comments?

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690835)
I did just that. Funny thing about Rivals...they only show what schools the players are interested in rather than schools that were interested in the player. These players had no interest in Texas, but there is nothing indicating whether or not Texas was interested in them.

I mean, DGB wasn't interested in playing at Idaho State, but I'm sure they would have offered him a scholarship if he wanted to play there.

Texas did not offer a single player in A&M's class.

Nothing has changed. A&M always has got the second pickings in the state and still doesn't muster much success out of that.

If the article gets posted it's going to get responded to.

If you're going to bold quotes from players saying they are going to the big time it's only fair that they get exposed for what they are.

Second rate players.

tredadda 06-20-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690851)
Texas did not offer a single player in A&M's class.

Nothing has changed. A&M always has got the second pickings in the state and still doesn't muster much success out of that.

If the article gets posted it's going to get responded to.

If you're going to bold quotes from players saying they are going to the big time it's only fair that they get exposed for what they are.

Second rate players.

Texas gets first pickings and has 1 NC in over 50 years. What is your point?

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690848)
According to Rivals, aTm has the fourth best class in the country for 2013...better than Texas. Any more dumb comments?

You do realize that the 2013 recruiting period is far from over don't you?

Why don't you go back the lat 5 years and look at the rankings.

You might want to watch who you call dumb while you're at it.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:53 AM

The SEC has four of the top five classes (none for the Big 12), five of the top ten (one for the Big 12), ten of the top twenty (two for the Big 12), and twelve of the top 24 (three for the Big 12).

No wonder Slive wants to play a bowl against the Big 12. It's going to be like a scrimmage where the ones play the threes.

Bowser 06-20-2012 10:54 AM

LOL @ Wickedson stomping his feet over the greatness of Texas versus the SEC. Pure hilarity.

Frazod 06-20-2012 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8687874)
Good to see MU still can't quit us.

Says the douche who's team didn't realign who has over 600 posts in the realignment thread.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690857)
You do realize that the 2013 recruiting period is far from over don't you?

Why don't you go back the lat 5 years and look at the rankings.

You might want to watch who you call dumb while you're at it.

You want me to go back to the previous years to before aTm was in the SEC? I'll concede the point that Texas got better players back then. It sort of proves that the top recruits want to play in the SEC seeing as they have already leapfrogged Texas in recruiting.

Bambi 06-20-2012 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8690855)
Texas gets first pickings and has 1 NC in over 50 years. What is your point?

I think they have like 4. They've won a bunch of BCS games too.

Bambi 06-20-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690881)
You want me to go back to the previous years to before aTm was in the SEC? I'll concede the point that Texas got better players back then. It sort of proves that the top recruits want to play in the SEC seeing as they have already leapfrogged Texas in recruiting.

Texas wants a player, they go to Texas over A&M. I don't know how many ways I need to explain this to you.

Just look at the offers.

And did you not read when I said the 2013 year is far from done?

Just look at the undecideds?

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...ings/rank-3053

tredadda 06-20-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690886)
I think they have like 4. They've won a bunch of BCS games too.

1 in the past 50 years from a school that gets first pickings from a state that consistently produces more HS football talent than anyone. This is with the largest budget and more resources than any other school. That is like the Yankees having 1 WS in 50 years. Inexcuseable.

duncan_idaho 06-20-2012 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690743)
Neither Texas nor Oklahoma were interested in either of the guys mentioned in the article.

Just sayin.

I noticed you quickly dropped this to talk about Texas, and Texas only.

Did you realize that Oklahoma had offered almost all of the high-profile recruits on aTm's commit list?

Texas A&M has been consistently third in state in the Big 12 era, taking the leftovers of Texas and Oklahoma. Step one is consistently beating Oklahoma (which it currently is doing).

Bambi 06-20-2012 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 8690903)
I noticed you quickly dropped this to talk about Texas, and Texas only.

Did you realize that Oklahoma had offered almost all of the high-profile recruits on aTm's commit list?

Texas A&M has been consistently third in state in the Big 12 era, taking the leftovers of Texas and Oklahoma. Step one is consistently beating Oklahoma (which it currently is doing).

I was simply referring to the bolded players in the article.

Bambi 06-20-2012 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8690899)
1 in the past 50 years from a school that gets first pickings from a state that consistently produces more HS football talent than anyone. This is with the largest budget and more resources than any other school. That is like the Yankees having 1 WS in 50 years. Inexcuseable.

nice cherry picking.

tredadda 06-20-2012 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690912)
nice cherry picking.

What part did I cherry pick? What part of my statement is false?

Bambi 06-20-2012 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8690918)
What part did I cherry pick? What part of my statement is false?

Why do you keep saying UT has 1 Championship?

They have 4

Saul Good 06-20-2012 11:27 AM

Texas claims four titles, one in the last 40 years.

eazyb81 06-20-2012 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690870)
The SEC has four of the top five classes (none for the Big 12), five of the top ten (one for the Big 12), ten of the top twenty (two for the Big 12), and twelve of the top 24 (three for the Big 12).

No wonder Slive wants to play a bowl against the Big 12. It's going to be like a scrimmage where the ones play the threes.

LMAO

tredadda 06-20-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690971)
Why do you keep saying UT has 1 Championship?

They have 4

In the last 50 years. Way to keep not reading that part.

Saul Good 06-20-2012 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8691003)
In the last 50 years. Way to keep not reading that part.

40 years (42, actually)

tredadda 06-20-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8691006)
40 years (42, actually)

My bad, that is why Wickedson thinks I am cherry picking.

Bambi 06-20-2012 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 8691015)
My bad, that is why Wickedson thinks I am cherry picking.

Don't worry about it. Everyone makes mistakes.

tredadda 06-20-2012 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8691046)
Don't worry about it. Everyone makes mistakes.

You more than any of them, so you should know. You still haven't refuted my statement. I was just off by 8 years. So do they have 4 NCs in the past 50 years? Do they not get the best in Texas and have nothing to show for it? Do they not have a larger budget than anyone?

DaKCMan AP 06-20-2012 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8690743)
Neither Texas nor Oklahoma were interested in either of the guys mentioned in the article.

Just sayin.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8690765)
In case anyone doesn't think you're full of shit, JJ Gustafson was offered by Oklahoma.

You going to admit you were WRONG, Wicky?

Frazod 06-20-2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8691059)
You going to admit you were WRONG, Wicky?

You must be new here. LMAO

DaKCMan AP 06-20-2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8691070)
You must be new here. LMAO

No, just foolishly optimistic.

qabbaan 06-20-2012 12:04 PM

You might say Gustafson "had options"

Pasta Little Brioni 06-20-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codered (Post 8690807)
KU fan ready to give Texas a handjob as usual.

He's just being a good little bannerman. It would be nice to have everyone of his posts autocorrected to "I am wrong" though.

Bambi 06-20-2012 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8691059)
You going to admit you were WRONG, Wicky?

I wasn't wrong. I was speaking to the bolded players as I said. Hence the term "either".

But yes, looks like one of the guys mentioned later in the article had been offered by Oklahoma.

Thanks for making me check.

I would have never noticed that not a single player in A&M's recruiting class has a UT offer.

ChiefsCountry 06-20-2012 01:56 PM

Looks like Chip Brown is reporting that Notre Dame to the Big 12 for all-sports expect football.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.