COchief |
04-18-2013 09:16 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief
(Post 9598812)
You can literally pull up 100 posts from any of the major contributors to this board that make them look foolish. It doesn't mean shit to be wrong a few times when your opinion is stamped to every move the team has made over the years. You can't win em all.
Making those kinds of comments about a poster with as many opinions on here as clay has is silly and makes you seem even more silly when you have your amount of posts over the course of over a decade.
It's like a guy going to batting practice for 20 minutes laughing at the guy that has been there all day because he swung and missed on a few pitches.
Chances are, if you were there all day you would swing and miss a whole lot more.
|
Hilarious that you, of all people, would rush in to his defense.
You are both the exact same when you zero in on one player, although GC is choosing negative, and you chose positive. You are both borderline insane and can not be reasoned with when it comes to that.
Here's exhibit A: Do you still think Ricky Stanzi could achieve being even a below average starting quarterback in the NFL? Or even a bottom type like Cassel, Fitz, Ponder etc? Basically could he lead a team to 10-6 with an average team against the easiest schedule like Cassel did in 2010?
Also you are liar and obviously have some mental problems as evidenced with the Dane drama.
And yes, being here and lurking a lot and seeing GCs antics does make me more qualified to comment on his behavior than someone who came 7 years after me and posted 20k times about how he just "knows Ricky can save this franchise, if only he can just get a chance..."
I am not cherry picking, I have only really focused on his behavior regarding DMC and Sean Smith, both of which he is locked on to RIGHT NOW. Admittedly with a small cheap shot about Cassel thrown in.
|