Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14165776)

I agree. Both of them were. The last one with Norton had potential, but the story structure was fragmented and the action sequences played on the screen like a video game. For the most part, critics liked it ... who knows why?

The "superhero fights villain with exact same powers" apex that Marvel has relied upon so often was sad, IMO. Lots of smashing. Acting out. Smashing in. If that's what you like, ok. And damn ... Tim Blake Nelson was miscast (or decided to overact in true Nicolas Cage style ... just 'cause he could). Tyler was ok, I suppose. But Tim Roth was wasted in that role (either give him something solid to work with or find somebody else).

Personally, I think it's a good thing that movies are subjectively experienced. That's why I'm cool with saying that movie was a disappointment for me. Mainly because it had all the potential in the world to be much, much better. That was a movie that reeked of predetermined studio formula.

FAX

Originally Posted by Mulliganman (Post 14167210)

I like Ruffalo much better playing the part. It’s too bad we probably won’t get a new stand alone Hulk film with him as the lead.

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 13743385)

It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't such a blatant Girl Power "Get more females to watch comic book movies" schtick. They're making Ms. Marvel into something she never was, and it feels like they're doing it just for SJW reasons.

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 14167664)

I thought it was just ok...nothing I left the theater overly excited about. The character just doesnt seem all that exciting to me. Wonder Woman was significantly better.

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 14167960)

Grown men watching kids movies. The only comic book film any good is the Batman trilogy.

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 14167960)

Grown men watching kids movies. The only comic book film any good is the Batman trilogy.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 14167972)

Oh hell people are enjoying things! Not my gig either but nothing wrong with it. Would be more appealing if she showed her super hero tits.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14168025)

Maybe it was because she actually laughed and was humorous more than I expected and because she could shoot fireballs out her hands, but I thought she was pretty attractive.

I'm a fan of hers, have been for a while.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14168042)

I liked her more as the movie went on. That obviously has to do with her being very robotic and controlled when she was Kree and then her turning more human towards the end of the movie.

She wasn't as bad as I thought she would be.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14168025)

Maybe it was because she actually laughed and was humorous more than I expected and because she could shoot fireballs out her hands, but I thought she was pretty attractive.

I'm a fan of hers, have been for a while.

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 14168048)

You enjoyed a movie? Asshole.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14167981)

You liked the female version of Ghostbusters. Your opinion is ****ing invalid.