Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Screw you guys for getting fancy on that possession.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Losing Bowers and Dixon hurt but Haith just being a terrible coach overall is what really kills this team.
|
Cut Phil Pressey. Just kidding. But seriously, this team sucks.
|
I wish Dixon wasn't an awful person.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hate to say it but this really reallllllly reminds me of the Quin Snyder days. His teams hot dogged it just like this.
|
Quote:
NWC is "a less-talented version of Matt Presey"? Are you ****ing kidding? Is that why scouts love his potential, despite his raw game, especially regarding his development as a slashing 1/2? He's having major growing pains, as I was very quick to point out, but his upside (according to numerous scouts, who rave about his handles and tenacity) is a less-skilled, slightly slower Tyreke Evans (and, I don't think "less-skilled, slighly slower" are really that damning when making a comparison to a guy like Evans). I wasn't saying Jankovic is a post-player. I was concerned that he would be put into that position due to a lack of frontcourt depth. If anything, you're agreeing with my point. And I don't think Jankovic is much like Bowers at all, outside of physical characteristics. The "Euro" term has been insanely bastardized; "Euro-style game" is a commentary of the differences in team basketball styles, created as a direct comparison to the more star-oriented play of the NBA...now it seems to just be a catch-all for "tall, white guard". Even if you address the characteristics of a player in the Euro league, Jankovic doesn't fit the bill. He lacks lateral slashing ability, nor does he have the awareness to distribute when help D arrives. My comments about Earnest Ross were at least partially as a result of posting while watching the game; I don't really feel that way, and the hyperbole was out of frustration. Picking a post apart in hindsight is convenient argument material, though. I respect your opinions, and you're more than welcome to respond, but I'm not going to engage in this topic anymore, because I don't think you can be objective or respectful. |
Worst ass kicking since Arkansas in '93?
|
Quote:
|
Missouri guards the player with the ball like he is a suicide bomber.
|
Quote:
|
That game didnt take long did it? Kinda went just how I thought it would.
MU is a VERY slow starting team...do that against a good team on the road and you're going to get ran out of the gym. |
Quote:
Too bad Mizzou left for a lateral. The new job has football quality which was less in Sagarin up till the Cotton Bowl at the end, and hoops is well behind. To make matters worse, Mizzou also took a pay cut. Forbes reported this week the Big 12 payout was 26M while the SEC was only 19M. But for Mizzou you had to pay your old employer back 13M. So you walked away with a piddly 6M this year. The final insult? You thought your new co-workers would like you. You heard so much about "harmony" and "cohesion" and "sharing." What a surprise it must've been when Alabama players were profanely mocking having to play in Columbia as they huddled pre-game. And Ole MIss calling you "Big 12 rejects". And the chants today in Florida. New co-workers are dicks! |
Jeff Gordon @gordoszone
Not a super happy day for Frank Haith. His team craters in Florida, then comes word the NCAA wants to pin unethical conduct on him. Ouch. LOL |
Wonder how quickly Haith is canned.....
|
Nice due diligence, Alden.
|
|
Look, up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's 2013 Mizzou basketball!
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-p...y-Puri_268.gif |
A special thank you to Mizzou for taking the epitomy of medicority that is Frank Haith off Miami's hands.
|
Quote:
|
What else can you but laugh. Good lord.
|
Quote:
|
Missouri stays losing
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Haith was such a terrible hire. We all knew it, even last year when they were winning.
We knew this would happen. How did Alden not? |
Quote:
|
Snyder over Bill Self
Holy shit the irony....and here we are 13 or so year later |
Quote:
|
I get that the show-cause penalty affects Haith wherever he goes, but how does it impact Missouri, other than it being an obvious black mark for recruiting? Are there any sanctions tied to it?
|
It looks like if he does anything to cause him to get sanctions at MU the penalty will be much more severe than usual.
For the school I mean. |
@GaryParrishCBS
I just asked Jonathan Williams if his commitment to Mizzou will change if Frank Haith gets unethical conduct charge. “No comment,” he said. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anybody got the "haters gonna hate" gif with Frank Haith whistling and while walking?
|
Must have lied to Alden when he was interviewed about the situation. So if true, he needs to go
|
Quote:
Honestly, Mizzou would almost have to be hit with something. Otherwise there's nothing to deter someone from crapping all over the rules and then picking up to relocate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I swear this school has the worst luck in the world.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't think I'm giving away any insider info, so here's some info from Gabe DeArmond:
Some further info on Haith have talked to some people familiar with the PROCESS. This is not specifically about Haith, but here is what I've gathered: The initial notice will not include a show cause or a recommended penalty. The notice will be ONLY about the allegations. A show cause may be a possible (even probable) consequence of the allegations that are made, but there will be no show cause put on Haith this week. That would not happen until the appearance in front of the Committee on INfractions in mid-June. THEREFORE, Missouri pretty much would HAVE to wait until at least mid-June before making any sort of a decision. I mean, you can't very well fire a guy who's been here two years with his record because MAYBE he's going to be in trouble. Even after that hearing, the actual decision from the COI won't be until probably October. That would be the first time Missouri is likely to know FOR SURE that Haith would operate under a show cause. Therefore, barring Haith simply walking away or Missouri negotiating a buyout, I think that's the first time they can realistically make a decision on anything. Further, IF a show cause is put on Haith, Mizzou would have to appear in front of the COI to convince them they should keep him. This is true even though Missouri hired Haith when there were no allegations (and in fact, after vetting him with the NCAA and being given a clean bill on him). Mike Alden carries scars from the Quin Snyder era. He does NOT want the NCAA messing with his basketball program. I know this. Gonna be real interesting to see what goes down. |
This is, in true Missouri fashion, a goddamn cluster****.
Missouri apparently had communicated multiple times with the NCAA to ensure that there would be no charges forthcoming WRT hiring Haith. So, with what we now know, can we expect sanctions even after doing due diligence? I'm almost certain there wouldn't be any written record of the NCAA's responses to MU, so we'd really have our hands tied if we chose to appeal. On the other hand, what can the NCAA do? Do you set a terrible precedent and not punish an offending coach, simply because he moved to a new school since the improprieties occurred? That would set a dangerous precedent --though I expect NOTHING from the NCAA; they seem to adjust their "official rules" at-will. Are notices of infractions sufficient evidence to have cause to fire Haith? I wouldn't think so, and MU would be left to foot the bill of his buyout (which probably isn't too much, given the low profile of his hiring). If Haith IS bought out, could Mizzou sue if he's found guilty of the violations? Does Alden get the boot? I'd say he absolutely should, but I could see the logic (however much I disagree with it) behind a board of curators wanting a steady presence at AD during the transition into a new conference So, in closing: **** you, NCAA. Possibly **** you, Haith. And **** you Pinkel. Yeah. |
M-I-Z!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A hapless fan... I believe you are looking for the KU football thread. This is the Mizzou Basketball thread...right? SEC! SEC! SEC? |
The NCAA is an organization of unimaginable hypocrisy. What they should do as opposed to what they will do further analyzed against their bylaws never yields a singular answer.
Combine that with an AD who makes mediocre decisions at best, and horrific ones at worst and you have the perfect combination for a Mongolian cluster****. Reconcile that against Mizzou's Law: If it involves Missouri, the worst will always happen. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This stuff is getting interesting here for a change... |
Quote:
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lp...bfx1o1_400.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I, for one, DO care...so that really doesn't work with me. Wish we would play you guys every week... Try again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wish he had never left... set UM's program back a decade with the likes of Perry Clark and Frank Haith. |
Quote:
SEC! SEC! SEC! |
Looks like Haith may get a show cause...along with Mortonand Fernandez. I'm glad that slime all Clint Hurtt is going down. Looks like Donna and Mike Glazier have sufficiently insulated the football team from further significant punishment. There will be some scholies but I've heard it won't be too bad. Looks like FTM charge instead of LOIC which is GREAT.
Cooperation and self imposition are a big deal. |
So... let me get this straight. It can't be proved that Haith did anything wrong BUT the NCAA doesn't believe it? Yeah.. they aren't crooked.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course, these were the same fans who argued the exact opposite on the Arthur case in 2008. Didn't matter the NCAA certified Arthur. Didn't matter that KU used the standard procedures with the league to enroll him. Nope. If ku does it, then it's just cheating. (Ignoring that ku did nothing in te Arthur case to even begin with) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In this case, Haith and Miami actually may have committed violations. Mizzou is out free if Haith is determined to have done what he's charged with, assuming they terminate him. If Haith is not deemed then Mizzou is fine and can keep him. In neither case does Mizzou get in trouble to my knowledge , only question is for Haith. Seems the NCAA is acting rationally in all instances here. |
Will this be the winter of Missouri discontent?
MU basketball coach Frank Haith is expected to be charged with unethical conduct and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance while he worked at the University of Miami, according to a report by CBSSports.com’s Jeff Goodman. If that happens, a multiple-year show cause penalty could result. A show-cause typically renders a coach unemployable in the college ranks. Former Tennessee basketball coach Bruce Pearl and Indiana basketball coach Kelvin Sampson were hit with multi-year show-cause penalties. But time and location would create unique circumstances in Haith’s case. He’s no longer at the school where the trouble originated, and when Missouri hired him in April 2011, athletic director Mike Alden had checked with the NCAA for past discretions and was given a green light. The Miami scandal, which focused on gifts provided by jailed booster Nevin Shapiro, was uncovered in reporting by Yahoo! Sports after Haith had moved to Missouri. Does that mean Missouri could pay for the alleged misdeeds at another school? If Haith remains the coach and is tagged with a show-cause order, it’s likely he would be prohibited from recruiting. This gets to the purpose of the penalty — to crack down on the rules violator. Too often, coaches have skated away from trouble by jumping to another job, leaving the departed school to suffer the consequences of probation. Haith’s case would be different in another way: Previous show-cause penalties were applied after the coach was fired or resigned with the idea that it would make it difficult for a school to hire someone like Pearl, Sampson or former Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel. Employ a coach with a show-cause order and you get his personal sanctions. It probably would be up to Missouri to decide if it wants to keep Haith. According to a source familiar with the investigation who is not authorized to speak publically, Missouri would be an observer during any hearing for Haith. If the unethical conduct charges stick, and Missouri wanted to keep Haith, the school likely would have to explain that decision to the NCAA — why it wants to employ a coach with such a charge — and live with the handcuffs applied to Haith. The school also would have the option to terminate Haith based on language in his contract. This is something of uncharted waters, the source said. But there are many steps to take in the process. Haith hasn’t received a Notice of Allegations from the NCAA. In the Pearl case, the notice arrived on Feb. 23, 2011. The Vols reached the NCAA Tournament and lost in its first game. On March 21, Pearl was officially out as coach and Pearl received a three-year show-cause penalty from the NCAA in August. Whatever the timeline in Missouri’s case, the story will remain part of the program’s narrative until it’s resolved. The Tigers take a No. 22 national ranking in both polls into tonight’s home game against South Carolina, and have hopes of competing at the top in their first season in the Southeastern Conference. But Haith’s situation will hang over the team for the rest of a season that started with promise. Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/01/22...#storylink=cpy |
Man that would be nuts if all of this lead to MU firing Haith....ironically the best thing to happen to MU bball in a decade after many people originally thought the hire was stupid. I really doubt anything comes of this. They've had what over a year now? They would have done something by now I would think.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.