Good post and I agree. We have a new coach, GM, and three new quarterbacks. People should be happy.

Even if the record happens to turn out worse than last year's, we are better off.

No. If the goal is Super Bowl, then it is unimaginable that Alex Smith will work out well in KC.

That doesn't make any sense. Alex Smith was a fumble away from making the Super Bowl two years ago. He should have started over Kaepernick this year as well. I can't wait until teams figure out Kaepernick and the 49ers collapse from Harbaugh's dumb decision. Smith was a number 1 pick! He had AWFUL coaching and AWFUL teams until Harbaugh came into town. The guy has tremendous talent and will thrive under Reid's coaching.

Let me see here. Trust the CP internet coaches on here or Andy Reid? Hmm....tough one! I think I'll trust Andy Reid over you guys on here any day.

Alex Smith is not a new QB; he is an eight year veteran who has been benched multiple times and ultimately replaced by a more dynamic player.

And who would that be? Geno Smith? lol...

Wrong on all counts. Three different quarterbacks does not necessarily indicate that you have found your franchise quarterback and a worse record than last year would indicate that the team is not better off.

Alex Smith could be a gold medalist on the Olympic standing there team. It was not Smith's play that led the 49ers to the championship game, as evidenced by the fact that the team went to the championship game (and on to the Super Bowl) without Smith the following year.

No you stupid ****, he was replaced by kapernick.
Posted via Mobile Device

EASY........you are going to make an argument that you don't have to have that elusive QB to get to and win the SB.

I am fairly tired of the entire Alex Smith debate and we have yet to play a snap in a preseason game.

I will say all coaches at times make mistakes but I am fairly certain Andy Reid knows more about QB's and his offense than the entire CP collective.

Mos of the same people who praised the Andy Reid hire now suddenly know that Reid's hand picked Qb cannot win a SB.

Its laughable.

Who would who be? I was referring to Kaepernick in the post you quoted. Kaepernick was the more dynamic QB that ultimately replaced Smith.

By that same logic Kaepernick's play had no contribution to the SB team last year. They basically won onne more game with Kap right?

Care to rethink that?

dumb.

Well, that is essentially true (although that scenario has a very low percentage of success). If you are trying to be the one team in a decade that wins the Super Bowl without a franchise QB, you really are trying to do things the hard way.

You're right. Going 24 for 42, 299 yards, 3 TD's, and 1 rushing TD for a rating of 103.2 against the Saints didn't help at all.

Or going 12 for 26, 196 yards, 2 TD's for a rating of 97.6 caused them to lose against the Giants right?

Give me a break. Tom Brady and the Patriots offense couldn't beat that Giants defense that year in the Super Bowl.

Man, you're right. I don't want a guy who throws 5 TD's with 0 INT's plus a rushing TD in the postseason to lead this team.