ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Hall of Classics (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Teedubya getting after it (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263522)

BoneKrusher 09-13-2012 08:29 AM

Teedubya Rocks!

Iowanian 09-13-2012 09:13 AM

Conspiracy!

I watched a youtube video that clearly shows that teedubya and the chiefs were online at the same time. This is obviously a conspiracy between he and the Chiefs organization to distract the fanbase from the subpar play of the team on the field and the lack of action by management and ownership to bring in and retain quality staff. Internal demolition charges can be visibly seen detonating the fact that Chief fans have not seen a playoff win since 1994.

Petro is talking about this now.

Demonpenz 09-13-2012 09:13 AM

Give the fans back football. We want to watch football. Hire a GM who doesn't think he has cured cancer. Draft a QB.

Iowanian 09-13-2012 09:17 AM

It's too bad the Chiefs didn't fight back as much last sunday vs Atlanta as the twitter guy.

BigRock 09-13-2012 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 8906165)
Next year the mother****er is going to be applauded by the masses of dumbasses because he'll increase spending by quite a bit, but only because he's being forced too through the CBA.

The CBA will not force the Chiefs to spend a single additional penny next year.

Why?

Because they already spend well over the minimum spending amount that will go into effect.

How?

Because the minimum amount will be measured by cash spending, not salary cap room. Those two things have nothing to do with each other.

What?

The Chiefs spend far more money than anyone thinks they do. But as this thread perfectly encapsulates, 99% of the general public thinks that if a team has ample cap room, they must not be spending money.

Why?

Not sure, but I suspect inbreeding.

Hey!

J/K lol.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-13-2012 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8906265)
The CBA will not force the Chiefs to spend a single additional penny next year.

Why?

Because they already spend well over the minimum spending amount that will go into effect.

How?

Because the minimum amount will be measured by cash spending, not salary cap room. Those two things have nothing to do with each other.

What?

The Chiefs spend far more money than anyone thinks they do. But as this thread perfectly encapsulates, 99% of the general public thinks that if a team has ample cap room, they must not be spending money.

Why?

Not sure, but I suspect inbreeding.

Hey!

J/K lol.

I don't know whether to give you a high five, or tell you to **** off.

Priest31kc 09-13-2012 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8906265)
The CBA will not force the Chiefs to spend a single additional penny next year.

Why?

Because they already spend well over the minimum spending amount that will go into effect.

How?

Because the minimum amount will be measured by cash spending, not salary cap room. Those two things have nothing to do with each other.

What?

The Chiefs spend far more money than anyone thinks they do. But as this thread perfectly encapsulates, 99% of the general public thinks that if a team has ample cap room, they must not be spending money.

Why?

Not sure, but I suspect inbreeding.

Hey!

J/K lol.

Good post. But we're still way under the cap. Again. And we still suck. So spend more cap money so we can get better. We have it. Again.

BigRock 09-13-2012 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 8906271)
I don't know whether to give you a high five, or tell you to **** off.

I can handle both.

But I didn't mean to infer the little voice asking questions was you, if that's what you thought. It was a representitive amalgam of the every man.

BigRock 09-13-2012 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 8906359)
Good post. But we're still way under the cap. Again. And we still suck. So spend more cap money so we can get better. We have it. Again.

This is the logic I don't understand. Pioli spends upwards of $120 million and we suck, but people are perfectly willing to believe that we'll be better if he goes out and spends an extra $20 million.

If he was that savvy a spender, we wouldn't suck in the first place. Why is he going to spend that extra $20 million any wiser than he spent the first $120?

At some point the discussion needs to shift from "They don't spend money" to "They spend money foolishly because Pioli is incompetent". Unless someone in the media starts making this point, I guess it'll happen around February when the dream of CBA-forced spending officially ends.

htismaqe 09-13-2012 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8906418)
This is the logic I don't understand. Pioli spends upwards of $120 million and we suck, but people are perfectly willing to believe that we'll be better if he goes out and spends an extra $20 million.

If he was that savvy a spender, we wouldn't suck in the first place. Why is he going to spend that extra $20 million any wiser than he spent the first $120?

At some point the discussion needs to shift from "They don't spend money" to "They spend money foolishly because Pioli is incompetent". Unless someone in the media starts making this point, I guess it'll happen around February when the dream of CBA-forced spending officially ends.

Good post.

Bwana 09-13-2012 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 8906254)
Conspiracy!

I watched a youtube video that clearly shows that teedubya and the chiefs were online at the same time. This is obviously a conspiracy between he and the Chiefs organization to distract the fanbase from the subpar play of the team on the field and the lack of action by management and ownership to bring in and retain quality staff. Internal demolition charges can be visibly seen detonating the fact that Chief fans have not seen a playoff win since 1994.

Petro is talking about this now.

LMAO

AndChiefs 09-13-2012 10:29 AM

They were talking about this on Fresno, CA this morning.

Mr. Flopnuts 09-13-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8906410)
I can handle both.

But I didn't mean to infer the little voice asking questions was you, if that's what you thought. It was a representitive amalgam of the every man.

Heh, I was playing along. (high five!)

Hammock Parties 09-14-2012 06:38 AM

http://i.imgur.com/7zxt9.jpg

bevischief 09-14-2012 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8908988)

ROFL sweet.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.