ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Are We Looking at the Chiefs QB Situation Incorrectly (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=306671)

kcchiefsus 03-18-2017 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12788950)
to me it sounds like peters has one foot out the door headed to LV/OAK/SD already.

will love to see into the future what he does when it's time for a new contract. :D
Based on what?

Nickhead 03-18-2017 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 12789093)
Based on what?
gut feeling. it's proven you can post anything on here without any evidentiary proof to back said claim :D

rico 03-18-2017 11:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 12789093)
Based on what?
His tattoo, for one.

Of course, ultimately I expect him to go where the $ is...

Nickhead 03-18-2017 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rico (Post 12789124)
His tattoo, for one.

Of course, ultimately I expect him to go where the $ is...
at the very least he will be west coast bound. i could see him in san fran even. he's just not 'kc' material mentality wise. i would say he will have an 'incident' before tyreek does.. i just feel a little unsettled when you see him play AND talk/tweet.

again, just a gut feeling.

Chief Northman 03-19-2017 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12789175)
at the very least he will be west coast bound. i could see him in san fran even. he's just not 'kc' material mentality wise. i would say he will have an 'incident' before tyreek does.. i just feel a little unsettled when you see him play AND talk/tweet.

again, just a gut feeling.
Yeah Peters is a punk. Will be a Raider as soon as he can.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-19-2017 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12789175)
at the very least he will be west coast bound. i could see him in san fran even. he's just not 'kc' material mentality wise. i would say he will have an 'incident' before tyreek does.. i just feel a little unsettled when you see him play AND talk/tweet.

again, just a gut feeling.
What, pray tell, is "KC Material"?

Sandy Vagina 03-19-2017 06:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12788903)
I would think hard about kelce for Cleveland's first next year. **** maybe Justin Houston too.
Regardless of the respective 12.5 and 34.5 million dead cap penalties that come with such trades?

http://media1.popsugar-assets.com/fi...-Spit-Take.gif

Sandy Vagina 03-19-2017 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 12788734)
well put.
Agreed. At some point, you have little choice but to either place some trust and faith in the scouts/coaching/managing to do their jobs... or just **** right off, and do something else with your Sundays.

You don't have to trade the world to move up into the top 5. If you have any respect for your scouting, HC/OC, and talent around the QB position... then you should feel good about staying put at 27.. (or even 59).. and drafting a young QB with skills to develop.

From what I read on CP.. it would take very little to significantly upgrade from Alice Smiff. So why all the desperation to whore team out for a top 5 pick? The Chiefs keep getting into the playoffs WITH this tulip QB.. AND their bestest player 100,000,000 man useless each postseason.

If little Smiff can almost get them there... they don't need a to trade into the top 5 to get a QB that can get them over the hump.... right?

mdchiefsfan 03-19-2017 06:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 12789200)
What, pray tell, is "KC Material"?
See Kush, Eric:

http://i1164.photobucket.com/albums/...pstcnpih8g.jpg

Sandy Vagina 03-19-2017 06:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 12789229)
See Kush, Eric:
lol, yep.. and they don't use daffodil expressions like "pray tell." :shake:

rico 03-19-2017 07:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12789227)
Agreed. At some point, you have little choice but to either place some trust and faith in the scouts/coaching/managing to do their jobs... or just **** right off, and do something else with your Sundays.

You don't have to trade the world to move up into the top 5. If you have any respect for your scouting, HC/OC, and talent around the QB position... then you should feel good about staying put at 27.. (or even 59).. and drafting a young QB with skills to develop.

From what I read on CP.. it would take very little to significantly upgrade from Alice Smiff. So why all the desperation to whore team out for a top 5 pick? The Chiefs keep getting into the playoffs WITH this tulip QB.. AND their bestest player 100,000,000 man useless each postseason.

If little Smiff can almost get them there... they don't need a to trade into the top 5 to get a QB that can get them over the hump.... right?
Clark Hunt (that's the owner/CEO of the team, Sandy), is that you?!?!?

If so, it explains a lot...ya know, because we as Chiefs fans should feel satisfied with first round or divisional round exits every year...despite the massive talent we have on the roster. In other words, we should all continue to loyally purchase tickets because we are a legit perennial threat to make it to the divisional round playoffs every year with Smith (as long as we have a mega-loaded supporting cast) because Smith doesn't throw interceptions!!! We Chiefs fans should feel lucky!!!

oldman 03-19-2017 07:30 AM
To clarify my earlier post, if we do draft a QB this year, we have to expect him to compete for the #1 next year. I have no problem letting him sit and learn this year, but if it's so important to get rid of Smith, he has to be ready next year. Screw Chase Daniel, and the vet backups we pay a premium price for.

RealSNR 03-19-2017 08:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12789185)
Yeah Peters is a punk. Will be a Raider as soon as he can.
What's it like being an insufferable, judgmental prick with a stick up your ass?

Just curious, that's all.

Chief Northman 03-19-2017 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12789274)
What's it like being an insufferable, judgmental prick with a stick up your ass?

Just curious, that's all.
There, there, change your tampon and you'll be fine.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-19-2017 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12789230)
lol, yep.. and they don't use daffodil expressions like "pray tell." :shake:
So, "KC material" is tasteless hillbilly?

Please go **** yourself.

Then kill yourself.

Thanks!

RunKC 03-19-2017 10:36 AM
It's always funny to see the posters thinking that the only way to get a good QB is in the top 10 at the top of the draft.

The majority of the good QB's in the NFL were picked in the 2nd half of the first rd on.

Nickhead 03-19-2017 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 12789200)
What, pray tell, is "KC Material"?
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...O_400x400.jpeg

Mr. Laz 03-19-2017 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 12789090)
It will still be too risky for ****s like you.
and the idea takes too much intelligence for morons like you

RealSNR 03-19-2017 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 12789301)
There, there, change your tampon and you'll be fine.

I never understand people who shit on KC's best players.

For example, there are people who don't give a **** about Kelce and hate him when he acts up on the field.

You let the coaches handle the discipline. This mother****er is a goddamn sensation and our greatest receiving threat since Tony G. You give that asshole your loyalty and a long leash.

Same goes with Peters.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-19-2017 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12789530)
I never understand people who shit on KC's best players.

For example, there are people who don't give a **** about Kelce and hate him when he acts up on the field.

You let the coaches handle the discipline. This mother****er is a goddamn sensation and our greatest receiving threat since Tony G. You give that asshole your loyalty and a long leash.

Same goes with Peters.
Exactly.

**** those morons who believe that players morals should match their own.

These players don't answer to you, and they owe you nothing.

Nickhead 03-19-2017 03:23 PM
tell that to roger goodell. im sure he has zero concerns about a players moral compass :D

Reerun_KC 03-19-2017 03:25 PM
JJ brining the swatter out

RealSNR 03-19-2017 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12789707)
tell that to roger goodell. im sure he has zero concerns about a players moral compass :D
Tell Goodell to come and suck it. Kelce is harmless to the glorious shield

https://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/qot...8/kcjerk.0.gif

Ming the Merciless 03-19-2017 07:09 PM
No, we're really doing great on QB as shown by how many superbowls and playoffs we win

RealSNR 03-19-2017 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12790107)
No, we're really doing great on QB as shown by how many superbowls and playoffs we win
Sexy thang. What's up?

I can't wait until Simply Red joins you and Clay, and the entire fam gets back together. Lookin forward to some new Vocaroos.

ct 03-20-2017 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 12787155)
First of all, let me say that I hate being the guy bringing this up, BUT I fear that we're all looking at our QBOTF issue incorrectly. Sadly, the question isn't about which QB we should draft, but rather (and I hate me for suggesting this), what veteran QB will be available in the next 2-3 years to replace Alex?

I'm basing this solely on our stinking franchise DNA. If true to form, the odds of DRAFTING a QB that has a decent chance to evolve into being The Guy are virtually zero. So, we're left to figure out what veteran guy will be available as a replacement for Smith.

Yeah, I know this sucks, but the facts of the matter are that the Chiefs simply do not expend high draft picks on QBs......at least not for the past 34 stinking years.

Ergo, the question isn't about drafting Mahomes, Watson, Webb, Trubisky, etc., the question is whether we go after a vet QB like Cousins, Kaepernick, etc. (I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.)

Man, when you look at it from this angle, the prospects of finding a vet QB who could take us to the Promised Land appear staggeringly horrible.

One only hopes that somehow, someway, we are able to shed our heritage and try a "new" approach in addressing our QB position...can you say "Expend a high draft choice for an untried, unproven but oh so exciting QB prospect."

Hope springs eternal......
i'm way late here, but i disagree with the "this franchise never drafts qb early" past equating to "dorsey will find us yet another veteran qb". I dont see that as dorsey's MO, at least not standard operating procedure. trading for smith at the beginning of his tenure (and Reid obviously) was a necessity, not preferred.

my opinion only, but he's far more in the GB mold of draft and develop as 1st option. these next couple years are the appropriate timing to get a true development project. i say that fully expecting alex smith is our starter this year, and most likely next year too.

raybec 4 03-20-2017 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12788950)
to me it sounds like peters has one foot out the door headed to LV/OAK/SD already.

will love to see into the future what he does when it's time for a new contract. :D
Jesus, do you have to wear a helmet when you go out?

Nickhead 03-20-2017 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 12790613)
Jesus, do you have to wear a helmet when you go out?
http://www.hahastop.com/pictures/Derp591.jpg

Dunerdr 03-21-2017 08:31 AM
Peters doesn't fit here = we don't deserve premier players at premiere positions we get tony Richardson, and willie roads whike other teams can have favres and die on sanders.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.