ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How would YOU try to improve the defense? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=317479)

htismaqe 09-16-2018 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13738138)
Berry and a shit ton more blitzing. It'll fail a lot, but at least it'll fail quickly; and more importantly, it'll at least get a FEW more stops, which we need to even out the amount of plays.

And it'll still be bad because we're bad, but less bad, and - again - it'll importantly even TOP, and keep them OFF the field.

Because giving up touchdowns quickly is better than stretching out a drive and potentially getting a turnover or forcing a stop. :facepalm:

Bob Dole 09-16-2018 05:41 PM

The D was fine until NY had the zebras get involved. -5 yards on their first two possessions.

Hoover 09-16-2018 05:41 PM

Draft a corner and a safety with our first two picks next draft.


If Berry returns we won’t be that bad off.

Bob Dole 09-16-2018 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 13738144)
Learning how to tackle would be a good start.

That is the major problem area from my seat.

CupidStunt 09-16-2018 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13738151)
Because giving up touchdowns quickly is better than stretching out a drive and potentially getting a turnover or forcing a stop. :facepalm:

Yeah because that's all we'll do, give up TDs every single blitz. Yep. It'll never result in a sack, a forced pick, nothing good. Ever.

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

UChieffyBugger 09-16-2018 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 13738135)
Yeah, because attacking Dave Toub, choking his mom in front of NFL Security, and threatening to kill the team bus driver had nothing to do with it.

It's all 'cuz dey be raysussed and stuff'.

You ignorant ****ing rube.

Could you please refrain from bringing up rumors about people that have not been confirmed? If you don't like Peters then that's your business, but there has not been a single source that has provided any proof that that stuff actually happened.

htismaqe 09-16-2018 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13738175)
Yeah because that's all we'll do, give up TDs every single blitz. Yep. It'll never result in a sack, a forced pick, nothing good. Ever.

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

How many sacks do we have over the past 18 games? Our players suck, our blitzes don't work. They get picked up and they give up big plays.

Jerok 09-16-2018 05:49 PM

Think we will make a trade using our 2nd round Rams pick for a defensive player?

Chris Meck 09-16-2018 05:50 PM

some of you have said it already, but-

1) Send a minimum of 4 at all times. I'd like to attack gaps more and less head-up read-and-react crap. More one gap looks and stunts. Attack, attack, attack. Shoot those gaps, disrupt the play. Bring that 4th from different places; outside and inside backers. Switch it up. If you happen across a runner with the ball on your way to the QB, tackle him. You, as a defense, force the offense to deal with you, rather than sitting back and seeing what they want to do. Bury the 2-3-6. Make it a rare occasion that you don't send 4 or 5; so that when you do, it's a surprise rather than the usual. You'll give up some big plays, but you'll also get some 3-and-outs and TO's. At any rate, it's better to get beat quick than get worn out.

2)In obvious passing situations, I want to see Jones and Speaks at DE. Kpass/Ford at one OLB, Houston at the other. Hitchens as your nickel backer, mixed with O'Daniel. Time to learn, kiddo.

3)It's time for Watts. He'll make mistakes, but Murray is awful.

At the very least, you'll make opposing QB's uncomfortable, get rushed throws and some INT's.

NJChiefsFan 09-16-2018 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 13738158)
The D was fine until NY had the zebras get involved. -5 yards on their first two possessions.

That was a very small sample size greatly helped by PIT shooting themselves in the foot. I sure would like to see actual footage of the penalty taking away the TD though. Scandrick didn't seem too upset though. Seemed like he knew it was the right call.

Chris Meck 09-16-2018 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13738178)
How many sacks do we have over the past 18 games? Our players suck, our blitzes don't work. They get picked up and they give up big plays.

except that's not true. Literally every stop we got today was rushing more than 3. One sack, but a lot of pressures and rushed throws.

CaliforniaChief 09-16-2018 05:52 PM

Do you guys think they're waiting to move Watts in until Berry's back?

No more waiting.

DrunkBassGuitar 09-16-2018 05:53 PM

HGH

CupidStunt 09-16-2018 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13738178)
How many sacks do we have over the past 18 games? Our players suck, our blitzes don't work. They get picked up and they give up big plays.

LOL, well we could go around in circles on this subject. We do not blitz enough, but obviously I'm not saying it would fix everything. Nothing would -- WE SUCK.

This is a minimum 2 full offseason rebuild, and that's if we dedicate a lot to it (which I'm assuming we will...not many holes on offense). We need literally two starting DL, 2 rushers and an entire secondary. Literally 4 goddamn starters.

Bob Dole 09-16-2018 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 13738207)
except that's not true. Literally every stop we got today was rushing more than 3. One sack, but a lot of pressures and rushed throws.

There were 2 sacks, but the zebras had to take one away because we were raping.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.