| pr_capone |
10-20-2016 12:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus
(Post 12495831)
Probably right. Which is another thing I'm thinking will annoy me: he'll probably be all anti-violence for the first 75% of the movie.
I'm probably being a little bitch about them trying to show the character's range and complexity but I like my Wolverine to be borderline murderous psycho.
|
Ya think? He was kicking ass left and right... he just refused to use his claws. At least until certain events involving the Hulks.
Quote:
As for X-23 I'm pretty meh. Cool character and everything but if she takes over the Wolverine mantle who will care? Ignoring the fact that we won't see Jackman anymore, this appears to take place in a desolate future where mutants are nearly extinct. Unless they plan to merge some Cable/Deadpool storylines with her in the future I won't be able to get excited for it.
|
While I understand your reluctance to accept a new Wolverine... I think this opens up all manner of new possibilities. I, also, don't think her being the new Wolverine means we no longer see Jackman.
*calling my shot*
Professor X is perma-killed in the franchise. This, and not being able to leave a clone of himself alone in the world, causes Logan to shake out of his self imposed exile and rejoin the fight. He goes around finding the remaining heroes of old he can, and any new ones, and rebuilds the X-men with Logan as the leader. With the McAvoy's jaunt through history drawing closer to the original movies... this would allow them to tell new stories and leave the original films/story line alone.
Personal note... Would be super cool if some of the original X-Men were to eventually make a cameo, for example, an old as shit Kelsey Grammer returning as Beast still running a now underground Jean Gray school for the gifted. |
Old Man Logan - Hugh Jackman's last Wolverine film?
(https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=301451)