ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 25 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sources: Rams and Chargers relocation agreement could be reached Tuesday (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=297476)

wazu 01-11-2016 10:18 PM
I really hate seeing the Chargers leave San Diego. Makes no sense. They actually have a solid fan base and market. Been there 57 years! A shame.

DaneMcCloud 01-11-2016 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wazu (Post 12020328)
I really hate seeing the Chargers leave San Diego. Makes no sense. They actually have a solid fan base and market. Been there 57 years! A shame.
The blame lies with the Spanos morons, not the city.

wazu 01-11-2016 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12020332)
The blame lies with the Spanos morons, not the city.
Oh, I agree completely. Of the three fan bases getting screwed by this, the one I by far sympathize with the most is San Diego. The Chargers have a good thing going in San Diego, but they are somehow continually too stupid to see it.

big nasty kcnut 01-11-2016 10:23 PM
Well my friend Andrea became a chiefs fan because the rams are leaving!

GloucesterChief 01-11-2016 10:25 PM
San Diego getting new stadium makes the most sense as it gives the NFL another SoCal location to host Super Bowls in. Oakland tends to be a little more chilly in Feb.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-11-2016 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12019986)
I live here and I say good ****ing riddance.

Shitty ****ing organization in a shitty ****ing building that wants to spend my tax dollars without a vote to build a new stadium to be shitty in.

**** that. More corporate and individual support for the Cards and Blues.

Rams have always been in 3rd place, even when they were winning.
This.

Toby Waller 01-11-2016 10:44 PM
The Rams as matter of fact are a historically successful organization. Thus just currently the longest dry spell ad far as over all winning is concerned

Skyy God 01-11-2016 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellypitts (Post 12020406)
The Rams as matter of fact are a historically successful organization. Thus just currently the longest dry spell ad far as over all winning is concerned
The Rams in St. Louis have been shitty for 15 out of 20 years.

Toby Waller 01-11-2016 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 12020558)
The Rams in St. Louis have been shitty for 15 out of 20 years.
Yes,in the great scheme of things,time,football history for that team,it's a drop in the bucket

Mr. Flopnuts 01-11-2016 11:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12019986)
I live here and I say good ****ing riddance.

Shitty ****ing organization in a shitty ****ing building that wants to spend my tax dollars without a vote to build a new stadium to be shitty in.

**** that. More corporate and individual support for the Cards and Blues.

Rams have always been in 3rd place, even when they were winning.
As a Missourian, yet an outsider, I say, THIS! Go back to where you are truly wanted...

Hoover 01-11-2016 11:32 PM
LA with two teams? Fine. And if Spanos wants to be one of them thats fine, but it should be the LA Rams and LA Raiders, the Chargers name should stay in SD. Buy Mark Davis out, let him own a minority share of the LA Raiders.

KChiefs1 01-11-2016 11:35 PM
Anyone have an aerial shot of the Inglewood stadium proposal vs the Carson proposal?

KChiefs1 01-11-2016 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 12020611)
LA with two teams? Fine. And if Spanos wants to be one of them thats fine, but it should be the LA Rams and LA Raiders, the Chargers name should stay in SD. Buy Mark Davis out, let him own a minority share of the LA Raiders.

I believe there was a rule instituted after the Browns left Cleveland that the name stayed with the city.

Might be wrong though.

GloucesterChief 01-11-2016 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12020621)
I believe there was a rule instituted after the Browns left Cleveland that the name stayed with the city.

Might be wrong though.
Not a rule but the NFL said it for Cleveland due to the fact that if they didn't the Browns fans would probably burn down the Hall of Fame.

suzzer99 01-12-2016 12:10 AM
LA nor the NFL wants the Raiders back. Too much criminal thuggery when the Raiders were in LA, normal fans were scared to go to the games.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.
Page 3 of 25 12 3 456713 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.