![]() |
Quote:
The OT rules are not brand-new. There is nothing wrong with the OT rules, Denver did NOT deserve a possession, it was NOT a travesty, and Seattle won the game. |
Quote:
Travesty? LMAO Bitch. |
Maybe we could leave the overtime rules the way they are, but the coaches and players switch roles. It would be cool to see Emmitt Thomas play cornerback again.
|
Quote:
Seriously though... a side effect of going to college OT rules would be the destruction of fantasy football. Imagine the first time some dude lost a thousand bucks because his defense allowed 42 points in a double OT game. |
How about each teams kicker kicks 5 field goals from the 50 and whoever makes the most wins? Great idea, huh huh?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I just looked. Seattle had 10 drives in regulation. Out of those 10 drives, Denver's defense was able to prevent a touchdown 8 times.
We're not talking about an impossible task here. Under the old rules, the coinflip-FG was annoying, but a coinflip-TD should not be something we should be worried about. If Denver's defense fails to do something they did 8 out of 10 times, they deserve to lose without a possession. |
Quote:
|
yeah, **** those whiners. who cares? It's a coin toss, now get out there and stop them.
|
Quote:
Touchdowns are not so incredibly damned hard to stop that we need to expect that the poor overmatched defense is incapable of preventing it. The current OT rules are objectively fine as they are, regardless of who they help or hurt next week or any week. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the not so distant past the Seahawks would have started centering the ball on the field around the 30 yard line for a field goal. You sound like a sniveling child. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.