Geno compares to Geno. And that's all Geno has to do in order to be better than the three ****ing stooges we currently employ.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a ****ing joke. Not to mention the fact he was 6 feet tall, and that was a horrible QB class. You want to look at a bad QB class...THAT was a bad QB class. Quincy Carter was the third QB off the board. ROFL Geno > Vick as a prospect, easy. And he'll be a better pro. |
Quote:
|
This poll isn't going to work out well because of revisionists with bad memories and the Geno haters.
|
Quote:
Vicks skill set was superior to Geno. |
That Qb class was bad as a whole but the talent in that draft wasn't.
|
Quote:
It was my perception when Vick was coming out, that he was mainly a scrambler, run first guy. I have never, ever been impressed with his ability to stay in the pocket under pressure to pass. He has always seemed to have happy feet and run. Am I wrong? |
It's been said before, but I'll say it again -
The worst thing Geno has done to negatively affect his draft stock was to enter the draft the year after Luck and RGIII. Most any other year he'd be considered a top 3 pick. |
All this poll really tells us is who the haters are....better than no one? LMAO x gazillions
|
Quote:
|
I like the ones that bounce back and forth between love and hate depending upon whether or not picking him at one looks plausible on that given day. ****ing tools.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
"well ifz the chiefz dont pickz him, he CANTZ be good". ****ing tools.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
LMAO "Save some money, trade Albert and Draft Luke..win win" Dipshittery at it's finest. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.