How do you profile without color? :hmmm:

Hey do you think he got his name because he's always drunk and he belches a lot?

They call jews a race and they are white.

Right, so are Iranians. What is your point? It's still based on looks and that has to do with racial characteristics.

I'm goin to D.C., D.C.here I come...

ROFL

WINNING!!!!

Well no shit....he was passed out in the car when it was running in front of an ex gf's house.

translation

He was drunk.....wanted some ass......he was probably talking on the phone in his car making up a story to someone (possibly Perkins) and he passed out.

You said color

YOU mentioned it.

Someone said it was 'profiling'

You went :


YOU mentioned it.

No one mentioned anything about it until you did.

Sarcasm doesn't translate well to the internet...

But it's a pretty funny read from where I sit.

But you can profile without color : the car a person drives, their clothes, haircut, where they live, what music they listen to, who their parents are...hell, ANYTHING can be used for profiling purposes.

Profiling is profiling. If you are doing it on looks then you are factoring in a person's color and/or race.

Yes, but in this instance you have a young black man driving a car 99% of the public cannot afford. He's in an area that is high crime and he's parked in a running car.

Cops would have arrested a person probably 99.999% of the time in that case regardless of what they looked like. In this instance they did not because of who he was. You can bet as they were approaching the car, ESPECIALLY WITH NEW TAGS and not yet registered, they were not planning on just checking on driver and leaving the scene.

If they were convinced he wasn't impaired then why didn't they allow him to drive home?

YOU ARE A RACIST

JUST LIKE RANDY MARSH

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0L-_aq_UMRI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

HE couldn't even afford that car - it was worth more than the house he was LEASING.

Sure, it was suspicious...but the fact is, if he wasn't driving and had not been witnessed driving intoxicated...then he didn't commit a crime and the police actually did the right thing by letting him go on about his business.

They had no idea he was going to do what he did, and his behavior around KCPD obviously did not warrant him being detained in any way.

You can't blame the cops - that's just stupid.

Probably because once he made contact with someone inside, they let him come in. That's what police are SUPPOSED to do - arrest someone as a LAST RESORT.

Dude went inside and, as for as KCPD was concerned, off 'the street' and not posing any imminent threat.

What Jovan Belcher did is on him and him ALONE.

No, I'm a realist. People make judgements based on what someone looks like. Everyone does. Some people are just better at lying about it.