The Chiefs think trading Marcus peters will solve their defensive problems, but stubbornly insist on keeping Sutton... Who needs Marcus peters.

This is why the Chiefs love mediocrity. I would love to know the real reason for this. Not the coachspeak bullshit.

I'm not going to be as upset as most - but that said; I'm not pleased either. Curious as to what we'll get in return.

Bet it isn't. We probably ****ing traded him for a 2nd round pick and a bullshit late pick.

You can't be angry about a trade until you know what you got in return. Everyone is available for the right price.

I also don't understand jumping directly to CHunt about this. Reid and Veach were surely the architects.

**** this shit

Well, at least there was a bit of bidding.

Matt Miller just said that he’d heard many times that Peters would never re-sign there. If that is true, I get the move.

But damn it, I want to KNOW that is why.

Yeah I'm sure it has nothing to do with the National Anthem bullshit. :rolleyes:

Says who? You?

Not a fan- we actually had good cornerback depth for what 2 weeks?

Whatever the return is they won’t have the same impact as Peters that’s for sure.

He must've been an epic shit head in the locker room. Cancerous.

Because trading away a top 5 corner on a cheapo rookie contract is the stupidest shit i ever heard.

There has to be more to this. Maybe he's demanding a contract and threatening a hold out. Idk. But **** this pisses me off.

Quick, i need some news to validate this trade.

I AM PISSED OFF, FRIEND

Give me Johnson and this years first

“I had heard often that Peters was never going to re-sign in KC. But I thought the 49ers were the team likely to offer most to get him in a trade.” - Matt Miller