ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Article: Chiefs Most Likely Landing Spot for Foles (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=269947)

cdcox 02-15-2013 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9406549)
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2cV2Liu3xiE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Pros:
Quick release
Good pocket presence
Good velocity
Good accuracy


Cons:
3/4 delivery.
Most completions were dumps to a back or a TE, with very few down field targets.
Mostly locked onto one receiver.
Painful interception.
Preseason game

007 02-16-2013 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9405548)
Mary Kay Cabot ‏@MaryKayCabot
#Eagles aren't shopping second-year QB Nick Foles and would want a 1st- or 2nd-round pick to even consider it, source told AP

1st or 2nd? For a third round prospect that really didn't do anything last year? LMAO

bevischief 02-16-2013 03:52 AM

No.

mdchiefsfan 02-16-2013 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9406868)
No.

exactly

Pasta Little Brioni 02-16-2013 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9406868)
No.

/Thread

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 9406552)
Speaking of Geno smith, did anyone here watch "Last Resort" on ABC this year. Geno looks almost exactly like the guy who played Serrat in that show.

http://www.jamati.com/online/wp-cont...hr-ngaujah.jpg

ROFL

Uncanny resemblance, for sure.

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9406519)
The Chinese government thinks you Genostrokers are a little over the top in your persecution of dissent.

We've endured attack after attack for months.

You can go **** yourself with a rusty fork.

YOU made us this way, dipshit.

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 9406490)
This is true.

No, it isn't.

You're better than that Frankie.

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:32 AM

Where's RunKC? Paging RunKC.

Run, how many times have you been "attacked" since BlackBob was banned?

Exactly.

There are quite a few people here who lack ANY context of the lifecycle of the Geno discussion on this board. Was Left Nut attacked for saying something as a criticism of Geno early on? No. I have brought up negatives about Geno several times and I've NEVER been attacked.

The simple fact is that this all STARTED because anybody that said something POSITIVE about Geno got attacked. And now a couple of people want to turn that around and make it sound like the Geno fans are the instigators?

The simple fact is that the discussion got RIGHT BACK ON TRACK the instant BlackBob was banned and persisted that way for quite a while, right up until the point that Dane started his self-righteous rampage.

Seriously Dane, you're a hypocrite. Get over it or go the way of BlackBob.

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:40 AM

This is one of the guys we've had to contend with for a good portion of the entire discussion about Geno.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270055

Here's a couple of gems from that thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rugby Thompson (Post 9406128)
Clark's an evil guy, it's all a nice guy act for the camera.

he'll never be as evil as his pops but he's keeping the tradition going.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rugby Thompson (Post 9406060)
dorsey is way more arrogant then peeoli and reid's a fat backstabbing liar.

And this kind of stuff comes on the heels of people endlessly suggesting we should move Albert to guard and cut Dwayne Bowe because he drops passes and he's a Gangsta-wannabe thug.

Anybody that's been part of this discussion for more than the past 3 weeks knows what this is about and it's not even ABOUT GENO.

It's about having to endure the opinions of morons.

SAUTO 02-16-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9405945)
Well, it's just so ri-Goddamn-diculous.

LMAO

I don't recall any one person stating in 2009, let alone dozens of people, that if the Chiefs didn't select Sanchez, they were "done" with the team.

Yet in 2013, we have many claiming that if Smith isn't the pick, they're DONE. And not only that, Andy Reid and Dorsey are "already part of the problem" and stupid, too.

If people want to complain AFTER the draft, I'll get that completely. But eleven weeks before?

JFC.

Dane I think people are at that point BECAUSE of all the top eleven picks we have had and burnt on players that have gotten us no where.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pasta Little Brioni 02-16-2013 09:51 AM

We just want the best for the team and feel Geno is it. Why settle for drafting a position we don't need and snagging the 5th best QB when we can have the guy we feel is the best and a starting caliber player at a position of need in round 2. **** value.

htismaqe 02-16-2013 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9407063)
Dane I think people are at that point BECAUSE of all the top eleven picks we gave had and burnt in players that have gotten us no where.
Posted via Mobile Device

Precisely.

His argument is completely without context.

EDIT: Not to mention the fact that he says:

Quote:

I don't recall any one person stating in 2009, let alone dozens of people, that if the Chiefs didn't select Sanchez, they were "done" with the team.

Yet in 2013, we have many claiming that if Smith isn't the pick, they're DONE. And not only that, Andy Reid and Dorsey are "already part of the problem" and stupid, too.

If people want to complain AFTER the draft, I'll get that completely. But eleven weeks before?
NOBODY has said Reid and Dorsey are part of the problem NOW. EVERYONE that has mentioned Reid and Dorsey has said IF THE CHIEFS DON'T DRAFT A QB, Reid and Dorsey are "part of the problem". That is essentially people complaining AFTER THE DRAFT, so where's the ****ing problem?

And yes, that's a rhetorical question.

Pasta Little Brioni 02-16-2013 09:53 AM

People forget just how big of a bloodbath the Sanchez arguments were. It was ridiculous here and it was all that was discussed for the most part for a long ass time. This is nothing compared to 09 and Dane is going all selective memory on us.

milkman 02-16-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gonefishin53 (Post 9406024)
With the #4 pick, the Chiefs can take Chance Warmack. /

A ****ing guard at #4 overall?

WTF is wrong with you?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.