ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Fantasy/CasinoPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Your Chance To Participate In A New Football Phenomenon (Sandbox Simulations) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=248221)

kstater 08-27-2011 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7856272)
lol, i learned my lesson with leigh bodden...if you want someone added to the database, ask right before your next pick

Yup, I had Ben Tate added, but didn't want him until the 600's. Asked during the 400's and he's gone.

cdcox 08-27-2011 04:56 PM

Generally, anyone who didn't take any snaps in 2010 has to be added to the db manually. I add them as I get notified and have the time and don't announce the additions. I won't draft those players for at least one round, unless I happen to be the one that notices them missing before anyone else does.

Titty Meat 08-27-2011 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7856274)
Yup, I had Ben Tate added, but didn't want him until the 600's. Asked during the 400's and he's gone.

HE'S MINE BITCH.

Hammock Parties 08-27-2011 05:03 PM

I don't think Ben Tate is doing shit this year.

Hammock Parties 08-27-2011 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7856282)
Generally, anyone who didn't take any snaps in 2010 has to be added to the db manually. I add them as I get notified and have the time and don't announce the additions. I won't draft those players for at least one round, unless I happen to be the one that notices them missing before anyone else does.

LOL, I was scared that you or Rain Man were going to take one of the players I asked for.

I added Thomas Davis to the draft pool a couple days ago, took a guard with 526 and then held my breath for 100 picks since I had traded 574 and 579.

AustinChief 08-27-2011 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7856272)
lol, i learned my lesson with leigh bodden...if you want someone added to the database, ask right before your next pick

You would have lost him anyway. I don't use the list of available players at all. I search for players that I am targeting... I would have added him myself had you not.

lostcause 08-27-2011 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7856303)
LOL, I was scared that you or Rain Man were going to take one of the players I asked for.

I added Thomas Davis to the draft pool a couple days ago, took a guard with 526 and then held my breath for 100 picks since I had traded 574 and 579.

I kept putting Davis at the top of my list and scratching him right before my next pick. Good pick up if he can stay on the field...

Same for Otah.

brorth 08-28-2011 03:45 PM

I think autopick was turned off for the St Louis Spiders, they're 10 picks down.

Old Dog 08-28-2011 07:58 PM

Am I safe in assuming "Nick" Kaeding is supposed to be Nate? Nate is who I'm wanting to take at #781

cdcox 08-28-2011 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 7858303)
Am I safe in assuming "Nick" Kaeding is supposed to be Nate? Nate is who I'm wanting to take at #781

Yep. I'll fix it soon.

rageeumr 08-28-2011 08:17 PM

Was there some database that you guys were able to pull names from in a semi-efficient manner, or is the player list a product of good ole data entry?

Rain Man 08-28-2011 08:22 PM

We bought the data from an outside source. I don't know if cdcox wants to share more right now or not. (In the long run, we don't want others buying it just to win their league, though it's not cheap.)

rageeumr 08-28-2011 08:30 PM

Eh, I don't need any more info. I was just curious how the database was populated.

cdcox 08-28-2011 08:39 PM

Even with the purchased data, all of the rookies, kickers and punters had to be entered manually. So "Nick" Kaeding was my fault.

Hammock Parties 08-29-2011 03:46 PM

lol, someone just took Barry Richardson

Fat Elvis 08-29-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7856272)
lol, i learned my lesson with leigh bodden...if you want someone added to the database, ask right before your next pick

you aren't the only one who wanted bodden....

lostcause 08-29-2011 10:07 PM

If anyone is looking to trade down a few picks this round, send me an offer

Hammock Parties 08-29-2011 10:26 PM

whatll you give for 718

Rain Man 08-29-2011 10:54 PM

We're definitely drafting for depth now.

brorth 08-30-2011 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7862197)
We're definitely drafting for depth now.

It's getting harder to find players that will even make a team.
I pick a name, google it (because that's what I'm down to), and the articles are all the same.

"Player X has been passed on the depth chart by Player Y, now it's a three way competition for the last spot with Player Z."

The actual, real teams don't even know if some of the depth we'll be picking this week are making the roster. :D

rageeumr 08-30-2011 02:24 PM

I'm pretty sure everyone I have drafted in the vet draft is a clear cut starter. Except for my backup QB, Flynn.

DMAC 08-30-2011 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rageeumr (Post 7863629)
I'm pretty sure everyone I have drafted in the vet draft is a clear cut starter. Except for my backup QB, Flynn.

I forgot about Pettigrew and drafted Scheffler. :doh!:

cdcox 08-30-2011 07:54 PM

I'm going to attempt to get the Tacos caught up. This is gonna be brutal.

Hammock Parties 08-30-2011 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7864890)
I'm going to attempt to get the Tacos caught up. This is gonna be brutal.

:(

Hammock Parties 08-30-2011 09:14 PM

lol, the Tacos have Kelley Washington and Hines Ward.

Good luck, Peyton.

Rain Man 08-30-2011 09:51 PM

I'm now at the point where I have to start eliminating positions because I'm already stocked up. That should make it easier, but I think it makes it harder.

Hammock Parties 08-30-2011 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7865184)
I'm now at the point where I have to start eliminating positions because I'm already stocked up. That should make it easier, but I think it makes it harder.

I'm having difficulty with the best player available/need situation.

I think I'd rather have two average backups than one good backup and one terrible backup....so I'll probably have to start drafting from positions that are drying up, or risk getting stuck with an awful backup.

Fat Elvis 08-30-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rageeumr (Post 7863629)
I'm pretty sure everyone I have drafted in the vet draft is a clear cut starter. Except for my backup QB, Flynn.

I'm in the same boat--except my backup QB is a starter as well: Hasselbeck.

Rain Man 08-31-2011 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7865201)
I'm having difficulty with the best player available/need situation.

I think I'd rather have two average backups than one good backup and one terrible backup....so I'll probably have to start drafting from positions that are drying up, or risk getting stuck with an awful backup.


I'm also still seeing a few gems out there, but at positions I don't need. I'm pondering drafting them anyway just as trade bait, but that's risky. Any time someone offers me a trade I get paranoid that they know something I don't and are trying to take advantage of me, so I seldom make trades.

MagicHef 08-31-2011 09:09 PM

How will guys that aren't playing the positions they're listed at be affected? For instance, Dumervil is listed at OLB, but will in reality be playing DE this year. Odder yet, Cassius Vaughn is listed at SS, but is playing CB (and actually always has).

cdcox 08-31-2011 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 7867877)
How will guys that aren't playing the positions they're listed at be affected? For instance, Dumervil is listed at OLB, but will in reality be playing DE this year. Odder yet, Cassius Vaughn is listed at SS, but is playing CB (and actually always has).

Those should be fine.

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 08:25 AM

There goes the first punter.

DMAC 09-01-2011 08:26 AM

Print em...Barth.

Old Dog 09-01-2011 08:27 AM

Out of curiosity, what pick is L1 on?

DMAC 09-01-2011 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 7868582)
Out of curiosity, what pick is L1 on?

804

cdcox 09-01-2011 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7868575)
There goes the first punter.

Don't forget about k/p returners and long snappers.

Old Dog 09-01-2011 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7868638)
Don't forget about k/p returners and long snappers.

Thank You, BIG MOUTH :cuss:



is joke...not serious

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7868638)
Don't forget about k/p returners and long snappers.

Do we really have to draft a long snapper?

We can't use our backup center or something?

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 02:41 PM

RE: KR/PR

If a guy can return kickoffs, will the engine allow him to return punts at a similar level, and vice versa?

cdcox 09-01-2011 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7869772)
Do we really have to draft a long snapper?

We can't use our backup center or something?

Sure. Of course, if you don't have legitimate LS, you will suffer a greater chance of your kicks and punts being blocked.:evil:

cdcox 09-01-2011 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7869801)
RE: KR/PR

If a guy can return kickoffs, will the engine allow him to return punts at a similar level, and vice versa?

The skills overlap but are not identical. :evil:

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7869975)
Sure. Of course, if you don't have legitimate LS, you will suffer a greater chance of your kicks and punts being blocked.:evil:

Great....

*goes off to research 32 depth charts*

kstater 09-01-2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7868638)
Don't forget about k/p returners and long snappers.

If you want us to include LS'ers, please include them in the database. The first five I've tried haven't been in there.

Rain Man 09-01-2011 04:05 PM

At this point there's a huge satisfaction in finding some player who looks promising and seems to have a starting spot.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7868575)
There goes the first punter.

HUH? I picked a punter 3 or 4 picks back man, pay attention.

kstater 09-01-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7870033)
At this point there's a huge satisfaction in finding some player who looks promising and seems to have a starting spot.

The age old question as to whether a bad starter is better than a potentially breakout backup.

kstater 09-01-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870040)
HUH? I picked a punter 3 or 4 picks back man, pay attention.

I assume you're the one that got Lechler?

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7870000)
If you want us to include LS'ers, please include them in the database. The first five I've tried haven't been in there.

I had my LS added to the db a few days back... just drafted him today. Zak DeOssie! BEST in the league baby!

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870040)
HUH? I picked a punter 3 or 4 picks back man, pay attention.

I just assumed Shane Lechler would be the first off the board.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7870043)
I assume you're the one that got Lechler?

Nope, Mat McBriar. I think he is better and slightly younger.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7870047)
I just assumed Shane Lechler would be the first off the board.

I think Lechler is starting to slide due to age.. that and I just couldn't stomach having him on my team.

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7870042)
The age old question as to whether a bad starter is better than a potentially breakout backup.

Didn't Cdcox say players with little or no stats would be simmed as average players?

It might be better to take a guy who doesn't see the field rather than a shitty starter if so.

kstater 09-01-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7870052)
Didn't Cdcox say players with little or no stats would be simmed as average players?

It might be better to take a guy who doesn't see the field rather than a shitty starter if so.

I'm doing too much ****ing work right now if that's the case.

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:22 PM

Turns out that most of the long snappers are not in the database. We'll skip them this year and work them in later.

Rain Man 09-01-2011 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7870061)
Turns out that most of the long snappers are not in the database. We'll skip them this year and work them in later.


Whew. That was going to be some tough research.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7870061)
Turns out that most of the long snappers are not in the database. We'll skip them this year and work them in later.

HEY! I already drafted mine! Come on man! It's only 31 guys (since I drafted the Giants LS)

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7870052)
Didn't Cdcox say players with little or no stats would be simmed as average players?

It might be better to take a guy who doesn't see the field rather than a shitty starter if so.

No, a player with none/low snaps will be simmed as one of the poorer performing players at that position with a significant number of snaps.

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7870067)
No, a player with none/low snaps will be simmed as one of the poorer performing players at that position with a significant number of snaps.

Good to know.

kstater 09-01-2011 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 7870062)
Whew. That was going to be some tough research.

I had names for all 32, but statistical analysis was gonna be a bitch.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870066)
HEY! I already drafted mine! Come on man! It's only 31 guys (since I drafted the Giants LS)

Hell, I'll even post the 31 names if you want! Then anyone can just look here to do their research!

I like the idea of keeping it as close to REALITY as possible... and a team just isn't a team without the long snapper!

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870066)
HEY! I already drafted mine! Come on man! It's only 31 guys (since I drafted the Giants LS)

Not too big of a problem before any leagues are formed, but now that the leagues are formed I have to edit the master table, plus one edit in another table for each league. So that would be around 120 edits.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7870071)
I had names for all 32, but statistical analysis was gonna be a bitch.

actually I don't see why, just checked muffed/blocked punts/kicks...

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7870071)
I had names for all 32, but statistical analysis was gonna be a bitch.

LMAO

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:29 PM

Sounds like longsnap.com got a record number of hits today.

AustinChief 09-01-2011 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7870075)
Not too big of a problem before any leagues are formed, but now that the leagues are formed I have to edit the master table, plus one edit in another table for each league. So that would be around 120 edits.

well shit, what the hell am I supposed to do with Zak DeOssie now! can I get a mulligan and just have him deleted from DB?

cdcox 09-01-2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870082)
well shit, what the hell am I supposed to do with Zak DeOssie now! can I get a mulligan and just have him deleted from DB?

Yeah, I'll fix it tonight.

cdcox 09-01-2011 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870082)
well shit, what the hell am I supposed to do with Zak DeOssie now! can I get a mulligan and just have him deleted from DB?

You have your pick back.

Zak DeOssie is also re-available as a LB in league 1 draft.

Rain Man 09-01-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 7870082)
well shit, what the hell am I supposed to do with Zak DeOssie now! can I get a mulligan and just have him deleted from DB?

He's not just a long snapper. He's a two-time pro bowl linebacker (as a long snapper).

brorth 09-02-2011 10:34 AM

Questions:
1368 total draft picks (1200 veteran + 168 rookie) / 24 teams = 57 players

Will we be required to trim our roster to 53 players at some point?
If so, will IR players count against the 53 or 57 man roster?

Hammock Parties 09-02-2011 04:35 PM

Cdcox, did you get my PM?

cdcox 09-02-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brorth (Post 7874005)
Questions:
1368 total draft picks (1200 veteran + 168 rookie) / 24 teams = 57 players

Will we be required to trim our roster to 53 players at some point?
If so, will IR players count against the 53 or 57 man roster?

Yeah, at some point. I haven't programmed that page yet. IR probably won't count against that total.

cdcox 09-02-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7874731)
Cdcox, did you get my PM?

Doing it now.

brorth 09-02-2011 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7874811)
Yeah, at some point. I haven't programmed that page yet. IR probably won't count against that total.

And if I've not mentioned it yet, huge thumbs up to you on this.
I'm pretty impressed with your apparent proficiency in this stuff.
Thanks for letting me help. :thumb:

kstater 09-03-2011 08:30 AM

League one people have pussed out. Over 130 picks behind league 2. 12 out of the last 20 picks on the clock.

League 2 should be done by mid-week. Could be done by Monday night.

patteeu 09-03-2011 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7875812)
League one people have pussed out. Over 130 picks behind league 2. 12 out of the last 20 picks on the clock.

League 2 should be done by mid-week. Could be done by Monday night.

League 2 members are far superior to League 1 members, obviously.

Hammock Parties 09-03-2011 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7875812)
League one people have pussed out. Over 130 picks behind league 2. 12 out of the last 20 picks on the clock.

League 2 should be done by mid-week. Could be done by Monday night.

I'm guessing there will be more balance in league 2.

League 1 will be a league of super teams.

Hammock Parties 09-04-2011 02:28 PM

So, what's the plan?

We're not getting through 300 picks in 2 days.

cdcox 09-04-2011 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7878669)
So, what's the plan?

We're not getting through 300 picks in 2 days.

What does everyone think about speeding up the draft picks (beginning tomorrow morning) to what ever pace is necessary to finish by midnight (end of day) on Wednesday? You have until kickoff on Thursday to make your picks. Then I'll close down the drafts.

At least then if some under the radar phenom emerges during week 1, no one will be able to add them last minute.

I'll see what I can do about 53-player roster management, but I don't feel like that is as critical to finish by kickoff.

patteeu 09-04-2011 02:54 PM

I think that sounds alright. I don't think it matters that much whether the draft finishes before the first games or not.

Hammock Parties 09-04-2011 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 7878705)
What does everyone think about speeding up the draft picks (beginning tomorrow morning) to what ever pace is necessary to finish by midnight (end of day) on Wednesday? You have until kickoff on Thursday to make your picks. Then I'll close down the drafts.

At least then if some under the radar phenom emerges during week 1, no one will be able to add them last minute.

I'll see what I can do about 53-player roster management, but I don't feel like that is as critical to finish by kickoff.

Fine by me.

Or we could have one warp speed evening.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.