Unfortunately the problem with your theory is that there is Generational talent in the pool, there really isn't, outside of the offensive line pool.

QB is at a record low. Receiver might be up there, and I've heard rumors that Tavon might have an outside shot at being a selection as well, but nothing from my source on it. RB is at a record low. TE is alright. Defensively, aside from maybe 1 DE/OLB and 2 CB's is a loss. DT is pretty healthy though.


Unless of course you're throwing around the phrase "Generational talent" loosely to make a point so you can continue to argue, and not that you actually have a better player in mind.

If I'm a ****ing idiot, what would that make you ? Protoplasm?

Yes, I've heard of the phrase, now quit avoiding my question and answer it, instead of deflecting.

I didn't stutter at all.

Re-reading it, I suppose it's a fair argument.

Not really. If he's saying Stanzi had a better college career than Geno then that's an opinion that is disproven through stats alone. As far as "better" goes, that's all a matter of ... well no, it's just not accurate in the slightest.:thumb:

You think so?


Alright, here we go. Lets have a little game, shall we?


Would you agree that the majority of CP wants a QB who can win big games? Who can win a super bowl?

If its a weak class, and you are in the top ten, the same rule applies. And we dont have three QB's. We have one starter, and two bags of shit in the hand. If your choices are Grahm Harrell or Tyson Jackson, you take Harrell. Are you somewhat seeing the point now? If its 2009, and your choices are T-Jack and Crabtree( without hindsight, and you've already acquired your QBOTF in Cassel(rofl), WHO DO YOU TAKE????
Posted via Mobile Device

Games are for children looking for attention. I answered the question with a fact, Geno had a better college career than Ricky Stanzi. Stats don't lie, in fact they are quite truthful when you think of how real they are. :thumb:

Sure


You mean like a BCS bowl?

You can make the argument Stanzi had a better career via record and record in bowl games.


I don't think Exoter is trying to say Stanzi's a better prospect (feel free to clarify).

Geno won a "better" bowl game, though. And in stunning fashion.

Stats mean dic. It's all about projecting the guy at the next level. There isn't a player in this draft that projects to be a star immediately

All that I'm saying is that teams win games, the QB sometimes leads them back in epic fashion and sometimes his defense gets him in holes too big to climb out of. West Virginia's defense was one of the worst in college football history, when Iowa was always known for having a good defense. Stanzi did well enough, he was Iowa's Alex Smith, but at the end of the day he was no Geno Smith.

:thumb:

Exactly. And with two bags of shit in the hand at QB, and with the Chiefs holding the top pick, WHO DO YOU TAKE????
Posted via Mobile Device