Sure. Someone could want to trade up to get Geno if they think the Raiders or Eagles would take him. Maybe the Browns.

If Geno is worth that pick, the Chiefs aren't trading it.

The Bills owners said he wants to move up for a QB.

I haven't heard of anyone else saying something like that.

Worth is an objective thing. What is worth it to the Browns, isn't necessarily worth it to Andy Reid. Especially if they get someone in FA or in a trade.

The Bills GM has openly declared interest in Mike Glennon as well.

ROFL

Am I wrong? Blaine Gabbert was worth trading up and taking at #10 to Gene Smith. Are you saying that means he was worth it to every other team in the league to take at #10?

It's not even remotely the same situation.

The argument here is that the Chiefs HAVE to take another position because no QB in this draft is even REMOTELY CLOSE to being worth the #1 pick.

If a team is willing to trade up to #1 to get a QB, then the above statement is obviously false.

And therefore this idea of them taking anything but a QB is completely invalid.

Once again, you are assuming Reid doesn't go after someone with a trade or in FA.

Why would they go after a lesser option, like Alex Smith, if there's a QB available at #1 in the draft?

Basically your entire premise is built on the Chiefs just saying **** it, we lose, and going with Plan B before Plan A even plays out.

No. I am just an unbiased non Chief's fan who is able to see things clearly due to me not being positioned promptly on Geno Smith's dick.

You are biased. And it's ruining your ability to discuss the NFL draft intelligently.

ROFL

You can't even keep your own argument straight. Your "logic" has the consistency of Silly Putty.

The REASON being given for why the Chiefs would acquire a QB via trade/FA and draft another position is because there's NO QB WORTH THE FIRST PICK, not in the Chiefs eyes, in ANYBODY'S EYES.

If another team wants to trade to #1 to DRAFT A QB, there absolutely IS a QB worth the 1st pick, BY DEFINITION.

Stop trying to change the argument or bog it down in silly semantics. The above spells it out clearly. Acknowledge it and move on.

The Chief's EYES are not the EYES of every other team needing a QB. So that entire point is moot. And if the Chiefs go for a QB in FA/Trade, it will happen BEFORE the draft.

You not wanting this to happen, is not the same thing as it being a possibility to happen.

Wrong. In EVERYBODY'S EYES.

Every single article you read says "there's no CONSENSUS". Consensus implies more than one, not just the Chiefs.

I've absolutely acknowledged the possibility of this happening. Just because it might happen doesn't mean it isn't utterly stupid if it does. Because it is.

Geno being at 47 clearly isn't the lowlight of this board. This dude has Nassib as the #1 overall prospect for this draft class. Not just the top QB, but the top player. This guy is smoking some mighty strong crack rock if he honestly believes that.