|
Quote:
Exponent and the Wells Report? Yes, yes it was. |
Quote:
As multiple non-Patriot fan scientists have stated, Exponent made several mistakes in their analysis, including not accounting for wind/rain, the effect of keeping the wet balls in bags, rather than in open/dry air, and the effect of the re-warming of the Colts balls in the locker room. The Patriots balls weren't too low compared to the ideal gas law. The Colts balls were "high", and they were high because of re-warming. But the NFL was focused on proving guilt, and they made it happen. Professor Leonard's powerpoint presentation lays it all out. I'm not going to rehash the whole thing. The guy is an Eagles fan with NO skin in the game, and explains why the conclusions drawn are inaccurate, and the evidence clearly shows no deflation. |
Quote:
|
Pats will wipe their ass with the Broncos
|
Patriots are going to knock their dicks in the dirt, and I really don't give two shits about this game.
|
Brady/Ball boy/Pats or some combination were involved with breaking the rules known as cheating and got caught. They got off on technicalities like a lot of people do in the court system. It is funny to me how all Pat fans will defend all of their BS until the end. It's not like it was one freaking game the balls were thought to be low. The Ravens obviously tipped the Colts off. Admit it, deal with it and it had zero effect on the AFC champ game but breaking rules is breaking rules.
|
Quote:
NON-PATRIOTS FAN SCIENTISTS. Key point that you wish to ignore. |
Pats fans are an embarrassment
|
The fact that Pats fans have to come here and defend their cheating asses is comedy gold.
Just accept it and move on. Ya got 4 Super Bowls and have been to 6. |
Great timing. Here's the full lecture by MIT Professor / Eagles fan John Leonard. Only 1.5 hours!! I'm sure everyone will immediately start watching!
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kp4u9vkNxhg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Looks like Sanders will play, but Mathis may miss... that sucks for the OL and Ware is out again.
Hope you all had a good Thanksgiving. |
Quote:
|
I'm going Denver 24-13. Pats are so beat up
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If there's a time for this team to be defeated, it's now. It's going to suck to watch this depleted team walk away undefeated (again). |
Hopefully, the ground opens up and swallows both teams.
|
Slurp, slurp, slurp
|
Quote:
|
Dink and dunk mixed with the run is what Denver's defense is least-best against (still excellent), so prepare yourself for a shitload of 3-7 yard passes.
Denver should win this unless Brock does what shitty QB's do. |
Danny Amendola - WR - Patriots
CSN New England's Michael Giardi reports Danny Amendola (knee) is not expected to travel with the team to Denver. Reports surfaced Friday night Amendola would not make the trip, but New England was not expected to make the final decision until after Amendola worked out Saturday morning. It appears they did not see what they needed to in the workout, and Amendola will not suit up against the Broncos. Amendola's absence leaves New England very thin at receiver. Keshawn Martin (hamstring, questionable) should see the majority of the snaps if he is active, and Chris Harper should have a decent sized role as well. Neither is worth starting against the best pass defense in the league. Amendola being close this week suggests he should be good to go Week 13. Source: Michael Giardi on Twitter Nov 28 - 10:57 AM |
Patriots by three scores.
|
Quote:
|
Supposed to be a snow game.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
After this game Brady could have a 2-6 record in Denver and an overall losing record vs Denver 5-6. Making Denver the only team in the NFL to have a winning record over the cheater.
|
Quote:
|
I had to walk around the block working-up the strength to possibly think about hoping for a Pats win. The good news is I don't....
I'm hoping for a meteor event happening about 4 minutes after kickoff. |
Quote:
|
Just bet Denver +2.5. Don't let me down mhm.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Never thought I would root for Denver, but I feel better about Denver tonight than I did KC -6.5 against Buff. |
Quote:
How much you win? |
I'd say the Refs won and handed the win stat to Denver
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Every team is beat up by week 12... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thomas pushes off and draws a holding penalty saving the game ROFL
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
45 bucks. Think I might go Raiders next weekend if Houston is out. |
The refs win so we all lose for watching
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Refs blew lots of calls for both squads, as they do every week. Denver's defense gave up some big plays, but they locked down more often than not and I was happy to see Brock play well. I know that many around here said he played like crap, but I guess I saw it differently. Again, not saying he's the 'next great QB', but he showed some positive signs that he can make good decisions and lead the team. Next up, Chargers - this win was huge for seeding. |
You know, watching the play live, I thought Gronk was trying to buy a call from the refs when he acted a fool on that debatable late/low hit. Big man thrash hard on ground like little baby then barely limped in locker room after leaving cart.
|
Quote:
I just don't see how that could be viewed as a low/late hit. |
Quote:
|
Wow I did not think the Donkeys could run on that Pat D like that. They have all the injury excuses but their D is pretty healthy. They let a terrible OL push them around and a wet behind the ears QB put 23 pts on them from the 4th quarter on. Pats are very overrated and the injuries are piling up.
|
Quote:
|
I think the NFL's love affair with the Pats is over. It was pretty obvious they did not want them to win this one. One bad call after another and so many non calls on the Donks as well. It seemed every time the Pats made a big play a late flag would come in. The Cheating Donks should have had at least a dozen more penalties in their "amazing" comeback. Holding calls just don't apply to this team.
And a big FU to the NFL for all their concussion protocall bullshit-and that really is what it is. 4th quarter-Donks player launches himself and hits Brady head to head on a very late hit-no flag. Maybe this is payback but when the refs allow this on the best QB in the NFL-no player is safe. And another F U to the Donks for taking Gronk out at the knee. I hope it all comes back to these cheap shot bastards. How many time have we seen them try to end guys careers? From eye poking to obvious knee hits. Congrats to the Cheating Donks you finally beat the Pats with a ton of help. I am sure you will not be so lucky in the playoffs. |
Now people are saying the Gronk hit was dirty?
Oh JFC, that might have been the cleanest play of the game. |
Quote:
Didn't look dirty to me. Brady also said this morning in an interview that he didn't think it was dirty. |
That's the thing with CP... few teams ever win a clean game. Denver never does apparently. But, I do get that this is a rival board, so that's expected to a degree.
There were some missed calls on both sides, a few act like the only way Denver won this one was due to bad calls. Silly. TEX is now saying that the NFL is building up Brock... oh my, that's jumping right off the cliff and straight into Looneyville. Quote:
|
Latest reports are that Gronk may only miss one game, "if that", though I havent' seen a definitive MRI result comment yet. In any event, the news seems highly optimistic so far.
|
Quote:
The Brady helmet to helmet hit was late and supposedly not allowed in the NFL. Only the Donks can get away with a D player launching themselves and hitting Brady high and in the head. Payback from the Commish, no doubt. It should bring a fine IF the NFL really cares about their players as they state in all the commercials. |
your tears, they are fresh and salty...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I pretty much never complain about refs, but given the way the refs called the game, this SI cover is pretty hilarious.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVJyAB7WEAQCzZh.jpg |
Quote:
Deal is, the DONX are SCUM. If the Refs are gonna gift games to Pat's opponents, the way they did Sunday night, I'd rather it be against teams that play the game the way it's supposed to be played instead of some total scum cheap shot outfit like Denver. |
lol
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Add yes, I stand by what I say -no PA double-talk. Perhaps that's why you can't seem to follow. |
I'm certainly not going to feel sorry for NE because of all the shit they do. What goes around comes around.
|
Quote:
I hope it's a battle the rest of the way, would love to see KC at DEN on the 2nd round. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now you know my take when I want credit for beating you when all your fan boys won't give credit when credit is due. |
Quote:
Hey - I want to go hang out on the Raiders Board for 16 years! How COOL is THAT?!?!?! ROFL |
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVJyAB7WEAQCzZh.jpg
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-sh...134646470.html Does Sports Illustrated's cover photo show another missed call in Patriots-Broncos? his week's Sports Illustrated cover is ... interesting? Considering the hullabaloo over officiating in the Denver Broncos' 30-24 upset of the New England Patriots — a storyline we've covered to death here on Shutdown Corner — the fine folks at SI picked a picture that could be interpreted as a Broncos player holding Patriots defensive tackle Dominique Easley. [] You wonder if the magazine's editors selected this photo from a pile of possible pics that could have landed on the front page, simply because it juxtaposed the game's main storyline — that Broncos backup quarterback Brock Osweiler improved to 1-0 against Tom Brady — against the sidebar story of officiating. Maybe this was just the best photo of Osweiler the photographer had on his memory card, because it's a damn good shot, for sure. Or maybe, as several astute NFL redditors pointed out, Easley was in the midst of a rip move that put Denver's offensive lineman in a compromising position, and it wasn't a penalty. Personally, it's much more fun to imagine the possibility that the photographer had hundreds of pictures to choose from for a Sports Illustrated cover shot, but couldn't find a single one without an uncalled penalty in the background, so they were forced to go with this one. Because conspiracy theories are fun. |
Brock on- how ghey.
NFL gifted that game to the Donks- and it took those cheating bastards into overtime to win. Pictures don't lie. How embarrassing for the NFL and the Refs to be shown as the frauds they are. Blatant hold by a Donk O linemen- something they have gotten away with since the Horseface days. If they call games the rest of the year like they did against the Pats-better just give them the SB trophy now. Disgusting rigged bullshit. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
