ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Top DC Candidate (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268579)

RealSNR 01-07-2013 10:43 AM

So could somebody please assure me that this switch doesn't mean we'll waste the #1 overall pick on somebody for the 4-3?

We're taking Geno, right? We're taking a QB?

Please say yes.

RUSH 01-07-2013 10:44 AM

I would HATE this ugh.

I don't mind the move to the 4-3, in fact I welcome it. But hiring a 73 year old man who has run the Cover 2 predominantly?

I see people talking about a Seattle blueprint, but do you guys really expect a 73 year old to adapt and change the core principles of his defense?

Hope I'm wrong.

ChiefMojo 01-07-2013 10:45 AM

In reality Poe may be a perfect fit for the SDE spot.

RUSH who do you think taught Carroll the 4-3 under... It was that old geezer Kiffin. He was the master of the under before he developed the Tampa 2.

Buehler445 01-07-2013 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9291627)
Might well be able to renegotiate that contract with Jackson and keep him.

I would. He's not going to garner much interest on the market, particularly if we cut him.

Was he a DT at LSU?

The Franchise 01-07-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9291635)
In reality Poe may be a perfect fit for the SDE spot.

Something like this?

Poe - Powe - Dorsey - Hali?

Houston - ??? - DJ?

htismaqe 01-07-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9291537)
Gotcha. I still think Jackson is gone. Dorsey would be a good fit....but only if he comes back under a better contract. Are you looking for more of a run stuffer in Jackson's spot or a pass rusher?

I'm obviously not familiar with the defense.

Looking for a guy that can eat space and split double teams. Basically a better version of Tyson Jackson...

htismaqe 01-07-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291618)
I think this is a terrible idea.

You cannot have 0 pass rush coming from a DE spot in the 4-3.

Nor can you have a guy 270 lbs in coverage like Houston.

Houston has to play DE in the 4-3. Period.

Houston and Hali both at DEs isn't an option. They'll get eaten alive against the run.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291621)
Yup.

I see no place for him here in a 4-3.

In a 3-4 he could be a backup, but too expensive for that.

Bye.

If Jackson is a backup in the 3-4, he's a backup in the 4-3 under.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 9291634)
I would HATE this ugh.

I don't mind the move to the 4-3, in fact I welcome it. But hiring a 73 year old man who has run the Cover 2 predominantly?

I see people talking about a Seattle blueprint, but do you guys really expect a 73 year old to adapt and change the core principles of his defense?

Hope I'm wrong.

Well, the reports are the he has already abandoned the Cover 2 and has been running the 4-3 under since Tennessee.

If that's the case, he changed his core principles a few years ago already.

ChiefMojo 01-07-2013 10:52 AM

In the under Houston is the SLB which basically a 3-4 OLB.

DaKCMan AP 01-07-2013 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291651)
Houston and Hali both at DEs isn't an option. They'll get eaten alive against the run.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291652)
If Jackson is a backup in the 3-4, he's a backup in the 4-3 under.

Don't waste your time explaining. Clay doesn't understand football. He just uses ratings by some website and then makes outlandish claims without any justification or reasoning to back it up. Him thinking Hali/Houston are better fit or won't perform any worse in the 4-3 than in a 3-4 should be all you need to know.

Hammock Parties 01-07-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291652)
If Jackson is a backup in the 3-4, he's a backup in the 4-3 under.

Well, that's good to know. Cut his ass.

RealSNR 01-07-2013 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9291633)
So could somebody please assure me that this switch doesn't mean we'll waste the #1 overall pick on somebody for the 4-3?

We're taking Geno, right? We're taking a QB?

Please say yes.

Your silence is scaring me, guys.

The Franchise 01-07-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9291698)
Your silence is scaring me, guys.

I'd like to think that with Reid and Dorsey coming in....that they're going to see the absolute need to draft a QB at this point.

I'd also like to think that Reid sees a smarter, more accurate Donovan McNabb in Geno Smith.

But not knowing what defense they're going to run......scares the shit out of me when it comes to the draft.

RealSNR 01-07-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9291702)
I'd like to think that with Reid and Dorsey coming in....that they're going to see the absolute need to draft a QB at this point.

I'd also like to think that Reid sees a smarter, more accurate Donovan McNabb in Geno Smith.

But not knowing what defense they're going to run......scares the shit out of me when it comes to the draft.

Demontre Moore is worth the #1 pick. If we had done something like drafted Ryan Tannehill last year, I would be perfectly satisfied to take Moore, who seems to fit the 4-3 under like a gem at a DE position that we have real apparent need for.

But that's not what we have. We have no QB, and there's a franchise guy sitting right there.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9291661)
In the under Houston is the SLB which basically a 3-4 OLB.

Exactly. Manny Lawson is an outside LB in Cincinatti, for example.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291686)
Well, that's good to know. Cut his ass.

This is much less about Tyson Jackson and much more about making sure you understand the 4-3 under defense.

It's pretty obvious at this point that you need to study up.

Titty Meat 01-07-2013 11:18 AM

Dont like that move at all. Taking the strongest part of the defense and depleting it. Hali always got his shit pushed in against the run and youll have 2 unknowns at defensive tackle plus who will be the other d end? **** that.

Hammock Parties 01-07-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291743)
This is much less about Tyson Jackson and much more about making sure you understand the 4-3 under defense.

It's pretty obvious at this point that you need to study up.

:rolleyes:

I know what the 4-3 under is. I only wrote an entire article about it 4 years ago.

http://kan.scout.com/2/866494.html

ChiefMojo 01-07-2013 11:22 AM

Moore would likely be a SLB IMO in this system and we already have Houston.

Unless we are planning to take a MLB or CB with the #1 pick, it won't be defense. More than likely QB or LT if Joeckel comes out.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9291775)
Dont like that move at all. Taking the strongest part of the defense and depleting it. Hali always got his shit pushed in against the run and youll have 2 unknowns at defensive tackle plus who will be the other d end? **** that.

If they bring in the 4-3 under, they're actually leveraging the strongest part of the defense.

Again, the 4-3 under would be a way to run the 4-3 with our existing personnel and not have to shoehorn the defense.

I will say this. A 1-gap 4-3 under is INFINITELY better than the 2-gap SHIT we've seen the last couple of years, 3-4 or not.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291788)
:rolleyes:

I know what the 4-3 under is. I only wrote an entire article about it 4 years ago.

http://kan.scout.com/2/866494.html

Then why act completely oblivious?

To be a douche?

Hammock Parties 01-07-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291802)
Then why act completely oblivious?

To be a douche?

I wasn't a douche. I was simply responding to your horrible post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291414)
In a 2-gap 4-3, you could play Jackson at DE and run Houston behind him at OLB.

Horrid idea.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291813)
Horrid idea.

Jackson playing the 5T in a 2-gap 3-4 is a horrid idea. Why? Because he ****ing sucks.

You took that completely out of context. If he can be a backup 5T, he can be a backup DE in the 4-3 under.

Doesn't make him suck any more or any less.

So yeah, you're being a douche.

Sassy Squatch 01-07-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291822)
Jackson playing the 5T in a 2-gap 3-4 is a horrid idea. Why? Because he ****ing sucks.

You took that completely out of context. If he can be a backup 5T, he can be a backup DE in the 4-3 under.

Doesn't make him suck any more or any less.

So yeah, you're being a douche.

He is gone. No way he is here with a 17 mil cap hit.

DaWolf 01-07-2013 11:32 AM

Kiffin should retire. This would be a horrible move...

Hammock Parties 01-07-2013 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9291822)
Jackson playing the 5T in a 2-gap 3-4 is a horrid idea. Why? Because he ****ing sucks.

You took that completely out of context. If he can be a backup 5T, he can be a backup DE in the 4-3 under.

Doesn't make him suck any more or any less.

So yeah, you're being a douche.

Sorry, dude. Your post sounded like you were arguing he should remain starter.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 9291831)
He is gone. No way he is here with a 17 mil cap hit.

I wouldn't be surprised if they renegotiate him.

He certainly won't be here under his existing contract, that is true.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoWalrus (Post 9291841)
Sorry, dude. Your post sounded like you were arguing he should remain starter.

Um, no. Not me. :D

RealSNR 01-07-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9291793)
Moore would likely be a SLB IMO in this system and we already have Houston.

Unless we are planning to take a MLB or CB with the #1 pick, it won't be defense. More than likely QB or LT if Joeckel comes out.

I'm confident we won't take Joeckel, since Reid really likes Albert and Albert really likes KC.

Good. QB it is, then.

SAUTO 01-07-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9291633)
So could somebody please assure me that this switch doesn't mean we'll waste the #1 overall pick on somebody for the 4-3?

We're taking Geno, right? We're taking a QB?

Please say yes.

yes

BigCatDaddy 01-07-2013 12:16 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9291633)
So could somebody please assure me that this switch doesn't mean we'll waste the #1 overall pick on somebody for the 4-3?

We're taking Geno, right? We're taking a QB?

Please say yes.

.

Easy 6 01-07-2013 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 9291534)
I think I have zero problem going back to the 4-3. We won't need to waste time finding a unicorn at NT and can just go after pass rushers.Posted via Mobile Device

LMAO thats a fair enough point.

ChiefsCountry 01-07-2013 12:42 PM

Remember Tyson Jackson played in the 4-3 at LSU.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 12:47 PM

I think a QB in the first 2 rounds is guaranteed to happen, but may not be the top overall.

RealSNR 01-07-2013 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9292141)
I think a QB in the first 2 rounds is guaranteed to happen, but may not be the top overall.

Then it's a waste.

I'll be so ****ing pissed if all we can get out of this draft is Ryan ****ing Nassib.

The Franchise 01-07-2013 12:50 PM

Geno NEEDS to accept his invite to the Senior Bowl.

Jerm 01-07-2013 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9292141)
I think a QB in the first 2 rounds is guaranteed to happen, but may not be the top overall.

Think we'd go Jarvis Jones if we make the switch to whatever 43 system we decide on...?

htismaqe 01-07-2013 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9292233)
Think we'd go Jarvis Jones if we make the switch to whatever 43 system we decide on...?

No.

DaKCMan AP 01-07-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9292233)
Think we'd go Jarvis Jones if we make the switch to whatever 43 system we decide on...?

No

BigCatDaddy 01-07-2013 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9292233)
Think we'd go Jarvis Jones if we make the switch to whatever 43 system we decide on...?

Denied.

DaneMcCloud 01-07-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9292147)
Then it's a waste.

I'll be so ****ing pissed if all we can get out of this draft is Ryan ****ing Nassib.

Reid already opened that door during his press conference by stating the Chiefs might get the quarterback NEXT YEAR.

Reerun_KC 01-07-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9292488)
Reid already opened that door during his press conference by stating the Chiefs might get the quarterback NEXT YEAR.

Tried to send you a PM... How are you?

Titty Meat 01-07-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 9292233)
Think we'd go Jarvis Jones if we make the switch to whatever 43 system we decide on...?

No

philfree 01-07-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9292155)
Geno NEEDS to accept his invite to the Senior Bowl.

If he wants to be the 1st pick in the draft he needs to go and grab the brass ring.

boogblaster 01-07-2013 01:43 PM

the QBs in this years dfraft are ify too me ....

Rausch 01-07-2013 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogblaster (Post 9292533)
the QBs in this years dfraft are ify too me ....

Dom Capers...

htismaqe 01-07-2013 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9292520)
If he wants to be the 1st pick in the draft he needs to go and grab the brass ring.

If he's being advised that he's already the 1st pick in the draft, he'd be downright stupid to play.

The Franchise 01-07-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9292545)
If he's being advised that he's already the 1st pick in the draft, he'd be downright stupid to play.

I hope he is.

Jerm 01-07-2013 01:56 PM

For everyone that said no on Jarvis Jones....thank you.

Hopefully Andy Reid sees Geno as his new McNabb and snatches him.

philfree 01-07-2013 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9292545)
If he's being advised that he's already the 1st pick in the draft, he'd be downright stupid to play.

Yeah but is he?

htismaqe 01-07-2013 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9292594)
Yeah but is he?

Is he not?

ChiefsCountry 01-07-2013 02:16 PM

Barkley isn't playing either. Most of that is due to his shoulder injury I'm sure but I'm sure he is still in conversation as well.

Rausch 01-07-2013 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9292642)
Is he not?

Dom Capers?...:hmmm:

DementedLogic 01-07-2013 02:17 PM

I was not sure where to post this. My Fiance just sent me a text message that said "I just met a guy named Tommy Brasher, and he said he is moving to Kansas City to be an Offensive Coach."

Considering he has been an Defensive Line coach his whole career, she probably got the offensive part wrong, but this might be our new Defensive Line coach.


EDIT: The reason she was talking to him required her to confirm his ID. I can't really say anything more than that. (It wasn't exactly legal for her to tell me this)

philfree 01-07-2013 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9292642)
Is he not?

We don't know.

htismaqe 01-07-2013 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9292654)
We don't know.

Precisely my point.

philfree 01-07-2013 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9292675)
Precisely my point.

I thought it was my pointLMAO

htismaqe 01-07-2013 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9292691)
I thought it was my pointLMAO

We're on 2 different sides of the SAME point. :D

keg in kc 01-07-2013 03:48 PM

Jesus, I hope not.

carlos3652 01-07-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DementedLogic (Post 9292650)
I was not sure where to post this. My Fiance just sent me a text message that said "I just met a guy named Tommy Brasher, and he said he is moving to Kansas City to be an Offensive Coach."

Considering he has been an Defensive Line coach his whole career, she probably got the offensive part wrong, but this might be our new Defensive Line coach.


EDIT: The reason she was talking to him required her to confirm his ID. I can't really say anything more than that. (It wasn't exactly legal for her to tell me this)

Nice, makes sense - was part of Reid during the 99-05 years in Philly... isnt he super old though?

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9292147)
Then it's a waste.

I'll be so ****ing pissed if all we can get out of this draft is Ryan ****ing Nassib.

Translation: if it's not going to be Geno Smith, I'm not interested.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DementedLogic (Post 9292650)
I was not sure where to post this. My Fiance just sent me a text message that said "I just met a guy named Tommy Brasher, and he said he is moving to Kansas City to be an Offensive Coach."

Considering he has been an Defensive Line coach his whole career, she probably got the offensive part wrong, but this might be our new Defensive Line coach.


EDIT: The reason she was talking to him required her to confirm his ID. I can't really say anything more than that. (It wasn't exactly legal for her to tell me this)

If it's Kiffin, it's going to be Marinelli.

But I have a hard time believing they are hiring the line coach before the DC. Castillo is absolutely going to be the OLine caoch. Andy feels he owes it to him after how he was let go in Phi.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9292488)
Reid already opened that door during his press conference by stating the Chiefs might get the quarterback NEXT YEAR.

They may evaluate these QBs and not like a single one of them enough to give them the keys to the franchise.

I'm going to trust his QB evaluation. I may disagree about it, but I'll give him some time to prove me wrong.

This is just my speculation, but if he doesn't like any of them, may go with Vick on a 2 year deal and take someone next year.

O.city 01-07-2013 04:06 PM

Uh. No to Vick. I don't see that happening again.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9293011)
Uh. No to Vick. I don't see that happening again.

What's the downside for a 1-2 year deal?

Team has a good line, team absolutely needs to build morale and win, and if you draft someone you have options if he's not ready.

I'm 100% pro drafting a QB, but there's going to need to be a vet option brought in here.

O.city 01-07-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9293024)
What's the downside for a 1-2 year deal?

Team has a good line, team absolutely needs to build morale and win, and if you draft someone you have options if he's not ready.

I'm 100% pro drafting a QB, but there's going to need to be a vet option brought in here.

Oh I want a vet, but not Vick.

Best thing he had going for him, was his athleticism and ability to allude pressure. Now he's broken down and isn't the athlete, and he is just downright awful from the pocket.


I'd much rather bring in Hasselback or that type of guy.

DaneMcCloud 01-07-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9293007)
They may evaluate these QBs and not like a single one of them enough to give them the keys to the franchise.

I'm going to trust his QB evaluation. I may disagree about it, but I'll give him some time to prove me wrong.

This is just my speculation, but if he doesn't like any of them, may go with Vick on a 2 year deal and take someone next year.

This forum is all about Geno Smith as a Franchise QB. Yet every single article I read elsewhere says that this draft doesn't have a Franchise QB.

I got the feeling from Reid's statement that he was tempering the fan base because at this point in time, HE doesn't know if there's a Franchise QB in the THIS draft and he doesn't want everyone to be disappointed if he chooses another position or trades out.

Like you, I'll trust his QB evaluation.

DaneMcCloud 01-07-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9293029)
Oh I want a vet, but not Vick.

Best thing he had going for him, was his athleticism and ability to allude pressure. Now he's broken down and isn't the athlete, and he is just downright awful from the pocket.


I'd much rather bring in Hasselback or that type of guy.

Hasselbeck is just too old and too worn out.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9293029)
Oh I want a vet, but not Vick.

Best thing he had going for him, was his athleticism and ability to allude pressure. Now he's broken down and isn't the athlete, and he is just downright awful from the pocket.


I'd much rather bring in Hasselback or that type of guy.

That's just not true.

His line couldn't hold a pocket for him to save his life last year. That's not the case here. The guy isn't running a 4.3 anymore, but he's still plenty elusive.

Where are you getting Hasselbeck from? He's got a year left in Tennessee. Who else qualifies as a "Hasselbeck" type of guy?

DeezNutz 01-07-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9293040)
This forum is all about Geno Smith as a Franchise QB. Yet every single article I read elsewhere says that this draft doesn't have a Franchise QB.

I got the feeling from Reid's statement that he was tempering the fan base because at this point in time, HE doesn't know if there's a Franchise QB in the THIS draft and he doesn't want everyone to be disappointed if he chooses another position or trades out.

Like you, I'll trust his QB evaluation.

We can't put stock in a single thing said in the presser today. Coach speak all the way.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9293040)
This forum is all about Geno Smith as a Franchise QB. Yet every single article I read elsewhere says that this draft doesn't have a Franchise QB.

I got the feeling from Reid's statement that he was tempering the fan base because at this point in time, HE doesn't know if there's a Franchise QB in the THIS draft and he doesn't want everyone to be disappointed if he chooses another position or trades out.

Like you, I'll trust his QB evaluation.

This is what everyone should want. They should want an evaluation, and not some asshole coming in here with his mind already made up like the last GM who I won't even dignify with a name anymore.

Instead, there's going to be some on here who go all crazy if Geno Smith isn't the guy.

I want a QB in here too, but I also wanted new leadership first and foremost. I trust that new leadership can identify QBs since that's what a majority of them have done an incredible job with a majority of their careers.

O.city 01-07-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9293046)
That's just not true.

His line couldn't hold a pocket for him to save his life last year. That's not the case here. The guy isn't running a 4.3 anymore, but he's still plenty elusive.

Where are you getting Hasselbeck from? He's got a year left in Tennessee. Who else qualifies as a "Hasselbeck" type of guy?

Vick isn't a pocket passer, he can't read a defense, and isnt' accurate. He will miss games due to injury.


If you're bringing in a vet, that's not what you need. I'd rather have Jason Campbell or Matt Moore

ChiefsCountry 01-07-2013 04:20 PM

I just don't see how he can sell bringing Michael Vick here. You would have to think he wants to rid of himself of the past few years in Philadelphia.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9293056)
Vick isn't a pocket passer, he can't read a defense, and isnt' accurate. He will miss games due to injury.


If you're bringing in a vet, that's not what you need. I'd rather have Jason Campbell or Matt Moore

Neither Campbell or Moore are free agents.

I'll just agree to disagree with about Vick's ability to read a defense.

DeezNutz 01-07-2013 04:21 PM

One thing not getting enough love for Reid is that he's a guy who has flipped mediocre talent for strong trades, not the one buying high on marginal talent.

Now that's going to be a refreshing change of pace in KC.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9293058)
I just don't see how he can sell bringing Michael Vick here. You would have to think he wants to rid of himself of the past few years in Philadelphia.

He may want to. It's just my speculation.

I think if he's cut loose, there's not a whole lot of options.

1-2 years of Vick is far better than trading for Alex Smith.

DaneMcCloud 01-07-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9293049)
We can't put stock in a single thing said in the presser today. Coach speak all the way.

But answer me this: When is "Coach Speak" not Coach Speak? How can you be absolutely certain that he didn't mean what he said? That he was going to evaluate the position and NOT choose a QB, just to choose a QB and that he may choose a QB next year?

I'm sorry, but I have to leave open the possibility that he's telling the truth. I also believe it's possible that they pass on a QB at #1 overall.

The Bad Guy 01-07-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9293060)
One thing not getting enough love for Reid is that he's a guy who has flipped mediocre talent for strong trades, not the one buying high on marginal talent.

Now that's going to be a refreshing change of pace in KC.

Everything about this is refreshing.

If you told me 10 days ago that the Chiefs would get Andy Reid, fire Scott Pioli, and likely get John Dorsey, I would have offered you a handy.

O.city 01-07-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9293059)
Neither Campbell or Moore are free agents.

I'll just agree to disagree with about Vick's ability to read a defense.

Just read that Campbell and Moore are free agents, where did you see that they weren't?

And thats been the biggest knock on Vick everywhere he's been.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.