<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8o0NK8rMIOI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

My God. That looks great! Avengers, Dark Knight and Spider-Man. Good thing we're getting all these babies in before the end of the world.

I ****ing love me some Spider-Man!

New suit looks awesome! The chick is way hotter as well. I'll check it out.

I love Emma Stone.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images...PPfu_sized.jpg

http://pics.wikifeet.com/Emma-Stone-Feet-646877.jpg

Looks pretty good basedo n the new trailer and emma stone ftw

It does look good. Seems too soon for a reboot, though. Is this one of those situations where they have to make another movie to keep the rights to the franchise?

Yes. Sony had to make another movie or the rights revert back to Marvel I believe?

It looks good, but I wish it wasn't another origin story. It just doesn't feel all that fresh to me, but I like how they seem to be going for a little more realism in the Spidey action scenes. Not as much cartoony CGI.

I enjoyed the last go-round. The first two were good, IMO. That third one though... ugh.

I totally agree. I love the first 2. William Dafoe as Green Goblin was just behind Ledger's Joker in my view. He was great. That third one though....yeah....it sucked.

I thought it was way too soon for a reboot as well. That was my first thought when I heard about it. I also wasn't sure about who they cast as Peter/Spidey. However, after seeing the trailer, and also finding out Emma Stone and Denis Leary were cast...it looks pretty good.

I have a feeling they're gonna be rebooting Batman pretty soon after TDKR. Which is ok with me. Even though they probably won't be as good as the Nolan series. The more Batman, the better. Batman's my favorite superhero story by far. Best villains.

That Green Goblin costume was horrible, though.

SPOILER ALERT:
Behind the scenes footage leaked!
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WQ8P3x_q7wI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

oh, i enjoyed them all, especially the 2nd one. I would agree the 3rd was the weakest.

New trailer is out......Im still not "feeling it" much.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TyTdRSZitCk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I'm much more attracted to the cast/talent involved than I am to the actual story. Which is weird. I'm a pretty big Spider-Man fan. I just don't want to get my hopes up too high. But I'll see it. Probably not opening weekend or anything. But I'll see it.

I like the darker tone and the spiderman wit better in this one already.

Toby was the worst casting decision ever made for the original three.

Agree. The tone is great. And the bit about small knives being his only weakness is wonderful. Feels a lot more like the Spider-Man I know and love.

:spock:

I like it a little more with each trailer.

Gotta really disagree here, i thought he perfectly embodied Parker... he not only looked the part of a kid to a T, but also brought a high degree of acting chops to the role.

I'm thinking this new one will be a mess, just like the new Brandon Routh supes was.

Holy balls this movie looks amazing! I just love Spider-Man. He's so ****ing cool! His powers and the way he moves and stuff. Like at 1:48, I almost jizzed a bit.

I have a few friends that claimed Spider-Man would lose in a fight against Batman and Wolverine (serparately, not together). They're ****ing idiots!






I'm such a nerd...LMAO

I liked Toby a lot.

But Andrew Garfield is easily three times the actor that Toby is. If the movie sucks it won't be because of a downgrade in principle casting.

Sweet! Lizard in Lab Coat. Now this is more like it.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/62406369@N05/7144203173/" title="Lizard in Lab Coat by Jawshco, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8162/7144203173_d707973cf8.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Lizard in Lab Coat"></a>

Looks pretty lame.

Really?? With each new trailer it seems to be showing a better movie as whole..

The trailers alone are better then spiderman 3..

Now depending on how the acting and script is, it will easily top 2 and maybe be the better of the spidermans..

I am guessing this is along the same lines as of Ledger doing joker and everyone saying it will not work compared to Nicholas..

I dont know why everyone hates on spiderman 3.

Neither do I. I think it was just the fact that it was, at that point, one of the most hyped movies of the generation. When it finally came out, it was just an average superhero flick. People were expecting the best ever. Not to mention they did totally **** up Venom..

I own the film and still watch it from time to time. Spider-Man 2 was the best with Spider-Man 1 being just a notch below. I'd put the third one at a couple notches below those two.

Lots of reasons:

It felt thrown together.
Director didn't have his heart in it.
It went too far in extreme directions.
Too many new characters.
Terrible film representation of Venom.
"Dark" Peter Parker
Lack of substance.
Too many Raimi family members w/ speaking roles.
Melodrama.
Lack of vision and consistency.
Mediocre acting.
Poor storytelling.
Spider-Man 2 really raised the bar/hard to meet expectations.

Those are just off the top of my head.

It's not too bad if you fast forward through the Parker being a douche parts. Those were painful.

This movie looks just terrible.

I guess if you're just a fan of movies it might look neat.

If you actually grew up a spider-man fan as a kid, it's kinda looks like what Speilburg and lucas did to Indiana Jones.

I hope I'm wrong but this just looks like crap. First and foremost, why do we need another origin story??? We already had one not too long ago.

I will admit that this looks better than Spiderman 3 but thats not saying much imo.

I'm not against a new Spiderman film but not another origin film cause its just redundant imo.

Exactly how I feel....to me this is just going over the same tired territory again. It looks well made but I'm bored watching the trailer because it's all too familiar.

The only reason this film was made was so Sony could retain the rights to Spidey and they wouldn't revert back to Marvel.

bingo

And that stupid ass dance scene.

Sandman should have been the secondary villian with Venom as the primary.

It should be interesting to see what they do with the origin though. It's obviously being expanded from what we've seen before. This seems to have a lot to do with the mystery of his parents. Which is brand new. I'm not even sure if the comics have ever really tackled that.

So, yes, while I agree with that I'm a little burnt out on origin stories, I am open minded as well. I expect it'll be something very different.

Probably a dumb question but what is that red thing that Spider-Man turns on his forearm?

That is his webbing.

So this one is taking a different approach? The movies with McGuire had the webbing coming out of his hands. Sorry I'm not familiar with the comics.

2 different lines of Spidey comics. One where it was a biological reaction from his wrist. And another where he made web shooting devices attached to his wrist.

This is the way it was in the comics. He had all the abilities but had to synthesize his own webbing.

Oh ok thanks y'all. I didn't know. I was skeptical at first but this movie looks damn good IMO.

This. Which I think could be a good route. It'll get a chance to show off Peters scientific side that I don't feel they highlighted enough in the Maguire films.

It also provides plot points as he always seemed to run out of webbing at the wrong time.

This movie just looks awful. I will not be seeing it in the movie theaters. There is just something about it that it has too much of a Twilight flavor to it. The first thing that automatically turned me off to it was that it is an origin story, and as many have already said, why do we need another one so soon.

How in the hell are you getting Twilight out of that?

Yeah, I'm not a big fan of that plot device but whatevskis. I'm sure it'll make things a bit more interesting..

Not sure but it just seems a little off to me.

This movie looks awesome.

Tobey Maguire was a great Peter Parker in 1 and 2. The writing for the Spider-Man sequences was always bad, and Parker/Spider-Man both were terrible in the third.

Where was the smartass comments? In the comics, thugs take just as much of a verbal beating as a physical one. Maguire barely said anything as Spidey, other than screaming for someone to hang on, or yelling in pain.

This new movie already seems to have the smartass Spidey in the works.


Next off, Spider-Man 3 committed the ultimate sin in my book. The developers took the Spider-Man lore and took a giant shit on it.

SANDMAN KILLED UNCLE BEN?!?!?

Ohhhh get the F*** out of my face with that bullshit.

Lets draw it out in crayon for those who dont know what Im talking about here.

Peter Parker used his newfound abilities as Spider-Man for personal gain. Looking out for number one. When it came time to step in and stop a robbery, Pete just stepped aside and let him go. Not his problem. Later, Peter's Uncle Ben is killed by the armed robber that he could have stopped, but didnt.

He learned in the hardest way possible that with great power, comes great responsibility. From that point, the guilt over what happened to his Uncle Ben drove Peter to become the superhero known as the Amazing Spider-Man.

Now in 3, they come off and say oh by the way, THIS is the guy that really killed your uncle.

So basicly, even if Pete had stopped that armed robber, Uncle Ben would still be dead?

F*** outta here.

There was absolutely no reason to write into the story that Sandman was Uncle Ben's killer. If you cant find a better way to incorporate Pete going Black-Suit crazy on someone, stop making movies about my favorite superhero.

Then there was that Green Goblin 2 but on a jet powered snowboard....yeah, whatever.

Venom....just...no. They killed off arguably the most popular Spider-Man villain of all time after twenty minutes of screen time, with a damn pumpkin bomb.

The same kind of pumpkin bomb that blew up right in Harry's face and gave him a few burns, but its going to kill Venom.

Bitch please.

Spider-Man 3 was a terrible film from a story, and source material standpoint. It looked okay, and had some cool sequences to watch, but overall that movie was shit. Its like Raimi intentionally fecked it up because Avi Arad forced him into having Venom in the third film and he was pissed off about it.

That emo shit...God.

This new Spider-Man movie looks like a much needed breath of fresh air. Back to the comic book style personality for Spidey, the mechanical web-shooters, it looks like its gonna be awesome.

Just to add something else (I swear I'm not trying to pick on this film but) I'm still not sold on the director.
His only film is 500 Days of Summer which I found to be mediocre at best. Believe me, I hope I'm dead wrong cause I want this film to be good but I'm just not feelin the trailers.
What I would of loved is having a film where Spiderman is in his late 20s/early 30s and the origin has already been established. And also for the villain, I would of loved to have either Venom or even Carnage. I think they could of pulled this off since cgi/motion capture is so good nowadays(hire the people at Weta who did Rise of the Apes & Gollum from LOTR).
Oh and have a more proven director at the helm instead of Marc Webb

As a long time Spidey fan, I'm excited that the villain is the Lizard. Trying to defeat the Lizard without harming Doc Connor in the process was always a challenge and the Lizard was one of the villains that could match Spider-Man in speed. I just hope they don't make him too "CGI-y".

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/16AwVWvjQhY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

OK, that looks badass.

And I love Emma Stone.

At first I thought the reboot idea was stupid. And I didn't like this brooding emo-kid as Spidey. But as more trailers have come out, I think he's okay. He doesn't really look the part but at least he acts the part. Tobey did neither. Plus, the 3D might help, as the "webswinging through town" parts should look good. And Emma Stone is a huge upgrade over whatsherface.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RIf_3aThoVQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<object id="sbPlayer" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/494483/"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/494483/" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>

<object id="sbPlayer" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/494485/"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/494485/" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>

<object id="sbPlayer" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" classid="clsid:D<param name="movie" value="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/491231/"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.springboardplatform.com/mediaplayer/springboard/video/su005/71/491231/" width="550" height="331" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YlubPsb9FS8?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

http://www.oscorpindustries.com/asse...variable/1.jpg

I agree with you about some things. The Sandman/Uncle Ben idea was a horrible one - if you can't make that monstrosity intimidating without completely sabotaging the main character's motivation, you're not worthy of being a Hollywood writer - but the cinematic universe can survive Venom's death. If nothing else, they can just have another blob of the material show up, maybe resulting in Carnage, which I'm sure the Spider-Man fans of the world would love to see.

But even that aside, there are things about this movie that really make me think it's going to be a stinker. They're changing the whole backstory, adding in the "Daddy Issues" which worked so poorly when they were crammed into the first Hulk movie, and replacing Jameson and MJ with the much less interesting George and Gwen Stacy. Bleh.

Lizard looks to be the high point, but I'm even apprehensive about that, seeing the obviously-fakeness of, for example, the claw-raking effects. It just screams a movie that's Green Lantern bad.

I can't finish watching these trailers for this train wreck...

Interesting that the Daily Bugle is now a TV network. Small, but good change IMO.

Has anyone tried calling the hotline?

spiderman is the most rebooting franchise in history

they have redone the same dozen storylines in comics,cartoons,movies etc for the last 40 years. Stan Lee has been a part of almost all those reboots.

I'm beginning to think that Lee won't let anyone write anything new.

New Image Of The Lizard

http://starkindustries.ru/_ph/786/650569335.jpg

http://starkindustries.ru/_ph/786/705346798.jpg

http://starkindustries.ru/_ph/786/22346764.jpg

Long 6-minute IMAX trailer was released with "MiB3". Looks decent. The 3D looks pretty good (on a giant screen, at least). They may have planned this movie as filler, to keep hold of the rights, but it's looking more and more like a flick that will make a little cash, especially with "Avengers" keeping Marvel/superheroes on the mind. "GI Joe" was yanked from release, probably because it was coming out days ahead of this film and would probably get assraped at the box office.

Isn't the whole sub-plot about the mystery of Peter's parents brand new?

'Venom' Movie May Tie into 'Amazing Spider-Man' Avengers-Style — EXCLUSIVE

Besides being one of the year's biggest box office winners, the success of The Avengers is already showing off its creative influence throughout Hollywood. For more than a decade, superhero movies and franchises were coveted summer tentpoles, recognizable characters with epic adventures ripe for adaptation — but Marvel's The Avengers upped the ante. The comic book titan's five years of strategic interconnectivity and world building, beginning with 2008's Iron Man, paid off with a grand crescendo, one that resulted in approval of fans and big returns.

Other studios foresaw the success even before Avengers hit theaters. Earlier this week, we learned DC/Warner Bros. is moving forward with their plan to assemble the Justice League, and based on Hollywood.com's conversation with The Amazing Spider-Man producers Avi Arad and Matthew Tolmach, the world of Spider-Man may be in the for the same interwoven storytelling.

While promoting Spider-Man, Arad and Tolmach alluded that their next project, Venom would be developed in a similar fashion that could potentially tie the films together. "What I'm trying to say to you without giving anything away is hopefully all these worlds will live together in peace someday," hinted Tolmach. Venom , which Chronicle director Josh Trank is rumored to helm, will follow Eddie Brock, a character previously introduced in Spider-Man 3. Don't expect any carryover, as Venom will be following Amazing Spider-Man's modern, realistic approach.

"It's an Eddie Brock story," explained Arad. "We want to be as close to the comics as possible. Especially in Eddie Brock's story. But again, pseudo-sceince is becoming science. All these tidbits about webs, artificial webs, is a huge industry now. Spiderwebs have unique qualities that will be huge for communications, fibers, and so forth. So we have taken the approach that we want to make the huge amazing movie about Eddie." Commitment to reality and tangibility is a key factor to Amazing Spider-Man. From Arad's description, the scientific slant will be a point of interest in Venom.

Tolmach and Arad insisted their Eddie Brock, who was drawn in early incarnations as a muscled man, would be more grounded. "He was a journalist. He had the wrong story, he got in trouble for it, he got fired," explains Tolmach, who also went on to describe his and Arad's approach to adapting Marvel properties. "The whole essence to us for the Marvel characters. Stay close to the bible, stay close to the emotional story, and the rest is fun."

When Venom eventually hits theaters, expect it to feel intrinsically connected to July's Amazing Spider-Man. As Tolmach puts it: "Look for the worlds to make sense with one another."

Not exactly related, but I read earlier that the Oscorp building was going to be in the Avengers as part of the city skyline, but didn't make it due to design scheduling problems or something like that. But Sony approved it and odds are we're going to see some more crossover/cooperation between Sony and Disney.

I've heard on various message boards that Spider-Man will be in the next Avengers movie and there's rumors of a possible Fury appearance at the end of this movie.

Ok.

In my humble opinion, you just can NOT have a Venom story come before the telling of the Secret Wars story. It IS where Venom comes from, afterall. Am I the only one that is bugged by that?

Maybe such a venture is just complete folly for live action. I would have no problem with it being some type of super modern animation

I've been wondering about all of this, and have come to the conclusion that SW is probably going to be written out of the on-screen Marvel universe. The time-lines are just too difficult to tie together. The alien will have to come from somewhere else.

Reviews are filtering out for this. Some good, some bad.....but the overall consensus is that its well made but a sort of been there done that. Just as ive thought all along.



http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_amazing_spider_man/

Yep.

Where can I catch the trailer for the next remake of Ironman???

79% on RT right now, not too shabby. Hell, as just a reboot of the original story, if it helps wash Tobey Maguire out of my mind it'll be worth it. Worst choice ever for a superhero.

Both my regular hard drive and IMAX hard drive are in. No keys yet, but as soon as they activate I'm watching that puppy and will post my review.

The Avengers reboot arrives around Christmas!

Forgot all about Ben Affleck as Daredevil, Nic Cage as Ghost Rider, or the guy from Nip/Tuck as Dr. Doom, then, have you?

At least those guys look the part. Spidey fans got stuck with this, not for one but for three films. One of the worst casting choices in film history IMO.

http://collider.com/wp-content/uploa...pider-man1.jpg

Well Spidey was always supposed to be kind of a geeky dork teenager, wasn't he?

I liked the first two movies. The emo phase in the third was a train wreck.

Here's why they should have done. Just continue on with the franchisee like the Bond movies do. There was no need to show the origin story again. I would guess most people don't care who plays Peter anyways.

Yes. Toby was such a bad casting that all 3 spiderman movies are numbers 3,4 and 5 of top grossing superhero movies of all time.

I really dont understand the hate for the guy. Before the avengers and dark knight, spiderman 2 was probably the best superhero movie made.

Those movies were brutally bad. I don't even remember them, that's how bad they were. Tim Burton's Batman was and may still be the best superhero movie ever made.

"Spidey" was pretty good. *Kept me watching for 2+ hours even though I knew the story. *New kid is 5000x improvement over Tobey, 3D FX are perfect for the subject matter and the IMAX screen size.

****ing ridiculous that they bothered making this. They already did a Spider Man trilogy, and most non-geeks enjoyed it fine. I liked Spiderman as a kid, but I'm not over the top knowledgeable about it. I'm just saying as a "lay person" this shit is stupid and unnecessary. It actually almost pisses me off. Hollywood has nothing new. Nothing.

Next they'll re-boot Superman again for the 600th time or some shit. Or since they have the Avengers, next they need to do the Justice League...then have a movie will all of them in it...

...it's just stupid. Blech.