ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Official: Andy Reid Signs His Contract (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268503)

Pin Head 01-05-2013 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9283968)
I know we should temper excitement but **** it its been nothing but gloom and doom


We'll be a little better next year but don't kid yourself about competing for an AFC West title anytime soon.

BossChief 01-05-2013 01:48 AM

What the ****. I just read a text from earlier that says Reid wants to try and hire Heckert AND Dorsey.

How is that possible? It has to be a typo, doesn't it?

Sorter 01-05-2013 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284180)
What the ****. I just read a text from earlier that says Reid wants to try and hire Heckert AND Dorsey.

How is that possible? It has to be a typo, doesn't it?

Dorsey=Gm
Heckert=Dir. of PP/CS

AussieChiefsFan 01-05-2013 01:53 AM

What are the details of the contract? yrs/$

BossChief 01-05-2013 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9284182)
Dorsey=Gm
Heckert=Dir. of PP/CS

Has this been talked about on here?

I've heard of an either/or signing, but not BOTH...bad guy, have you heard this?

Sorter 01-05-2013 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284186)
Has this been talked about on here?

I've heard of an either/or signing, but not BOTH...bad guy, have you heard this?

That's the rumor I've seen consistently. Dorsey=Gm and Heckert hired in other capacity.

BossChief 01-05-2013 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9284187)
That's the rumor I've seen consistently. Dorsey=Gm and Heckert hired in other capacity.

It's true...must not have been a typo, then.

Sorter 01-05-2013 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284193)
It's true...must not have been a typo, then.

I'd be more surprised if it didn't happen IMO.

BossChief 01-05-2013 02:03 AM

Not sure how I feel about Heckert, but as a duo we would have a highly impressive front office.

Heckert not going all in for RG3 is troubling, though.

Sorter 01-05-2013 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284198)
Not sure how I feel about Heckert, but as a duo we would have a highly impressive front office.

Heckert not going all in for RG3 is troubling, though.

One thing nobody has talked about it a scenario in which he desired to go all in and was told no by the owner...

AussieChiefsFan 01-05-2013 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9284184)
What are the details of the contract? yrs/$

No one knows?

BryanBusby 01-05-2013 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284198)
Not sure how I feel about Heckert, but as a duo we would have a highly impressive front office.

Heckert not going all in for RG3 is troubling, though.

That was a Holmgren decision afaik

FloridaMan88 01-05-2013 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan (Post 9284208)
No one knows?

5 year contract, not sure on $ amount but it will probably make him among the highest paid HC's in the league.

AussieChiefsFan 01-05-2013 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9284225)
5 year contract, not sure on $ amount but it will probably make him among the highest paid HC's in the league.

Thanks

007 01-05-2013 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9283860)
Didn't you guys say you would fold the tent at the end of the year?

I don't think you should just asking.

Nope. He mentioned a few times that he would rebrand SOC to a Chiefs news thing.

BigChiefFan 01-05-2013 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Janus (Post 9284225)
5 year contract, not sure on $ amount but it will probably make him among the highest paid HC's in the league.

Bully for Clark and the Chiefs. I've given him alot of shit in recent months and I'm glad he's exceeded my expectations. I stand corrected in his passion for winning.

Mother****erJones 01-05-2013 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Narrow Head (Post 9284177)
We'll be a little better next year but don't kid yourself about competing for an AFC West title anytime soon.

We'll compete! Ill bet anything. We have a REAL coaching staff. We'll have a ****ing great front office

Mother****erJones 01-05-2013 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9284198)
Not sure how I feel about Heckert, but as a duo we would have a highly impressive front office.

Heckert not going all in for RG3 is troubling, though.

Hey Boss, go look it up. Cleveland offered a good deal. WASH got the deal done because Fisher and Shanny are pals. Cleveland talked to the media about how pissed they were they thought they had a deal

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 07:59 AM

It's a good safe pick... Reid is a good coach his time in Philly just got stale...

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284413)
It's a good safe pick... Reid is a good coach his time in Philly just got stale...

One of the most universal highly regarded moves in recent Chiefs history. Respected by fans and rivals alike. This team gets a QB look out. Ohhhh, we have the number one overall pick of the litter :)

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284417)
One of the most universal highly regarded moves in recent Chiefs history. Respected by fans and rivals alike. This team gets a QB look out. Ohhhh, we have the number one overall pick of the litter :)

Well he damn sure won't hurt KC, he may bring in a Vet at QB though...

Mr. Flopnuts 01-05-2013 08:07 AM

R8ers decides not to troll us on this...Hmm...shocking. :D

threebag 01-05-2013 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9284425)
R8ers decides not to troll us on this...Hmm...shocking. :D

One step closer to CHIEFS fandom.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9284425)
R8ers decides not to troll us on this...Hmm...shocking. :D

Theres not alot to troll, you can't get any ****ing worse even if I was the coach. :)

WhiteWhale 01-05-2013 08:14 AM

You know... I don't think there is a single coach in the entire NFL who manages the clock worse than Andy Reid. His clock management is sub-herm.

I hope you guys realize that. Andy is great at building a team, designing an offense, and all of that. On gameday, he is terrible. The guy would have a couple SB championships if he had been able to get out of his team's way.

Sooo... I"m glad you guys are all happy. I can't say there was a hire out there I was really high on... Andy Reid was 2nd on my retread list though. It could have been much worse.

Just be prepared to have a really good team that is held back by their coach on gameday. Just like Marty.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284424)
Well he damn sure won't hurt KC, he may bring in a Vet at QB though...

You can keep Palmer.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284461)
You can keep Palmer.

Since we are rebuilding, I just as well have Pryor at QB to be honest with you and save 13 Million..

1 player won't make a team win even if he does throw for 4k yards if you can never stop the other team from scoring.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284469)
Since we are rebuilding, I just as well have Pryor at QB to be honest with you and save 13 Million..

1 player won't make a team win even if he does throw for 4k yards if you can never stop the other team from scoring.

You need to hope like hell Tyler Wilson drops to your spot and they snatch him up. I won't say shit about your QB situation if that happens. Pryor won't amount to squat. You don't have a legit longterm solution at QB, you are toast in today's NFL.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284471)
You need to hope like hell Tyler Wilson drops to your spot and they snatch him up. I won't say shit about your QB situation if that happens. Pryor won't amount to squat. You don't have a legit longterm solution at QB, you are toast in today's NFL.

You are getting ready to see why Madden and many in the NFL suggested Reggie become our GM... The NFL is about finding the gems in the draft not the first rounders..

You just worry about Cheapo Clark and the Cheaps , we got this shit covered in Raiderland

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:40 AM

Maybe he'll give us a 2nd for Stanzi then??

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284492)
Maybe he'll give us a 2nd for Stanzi then??


You guys take our scrubs.. What did I tell you about Routt and Boss last year when you got them? I told you Routt was shit and Boss was a member of the hot tub club... I was right again.:clap:

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:46 AM

...and I told you how bad the Faider defense and secondary was going to be. You didn't listen at the time.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284499)
...and I told you how bad the Faider defense and secondary was going to be. You didn't listen at the time.


I knew that they would not be good, I was just hoping they wouldn't be as bad as they were. No one could have predicted them being that bad.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284510)
I knew that they would not be good, I was just hoping they wouldn't be as bad as they were. No one could have predicted them being that bad.

I did :evil: They were starting guys that likely wouldn't make a UFL squad.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9284511)
I did :evil: They were starting guys that likely wouldn't make a UFL squad.

No you didn't... You also predicted the Chiefs would have a better record than the Raiders and that was epic fail, you predicted the Chiefs to beat the Raiders this year and you got swept, You predicted the Cheaps in the playoffs this year, was so damn confident you bet with me and we called that off but you still lost.. Don't give me that horse shit because as dysfunctional as the Raiders are we do go to a SB every now and then and do win a Playoff game every now and then and no matter how well you think the Chiefs draft you have the exact same thing in the trophy case as we do for the last 20 years minus the AFC Championship Trophy.

Rausch 01-05-2013 09:10 AM

And NOW we can move forward...

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 09:11 AM

Mission accomplished

CoMoChief 01-05-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284481)
You are getting ready to see why Madden and many in the NFL suggested Reggie become our GM... The NFL is about finding the gems in the draft not the first rounders..

You just worry about Cheapo Clark and the Cheaps , we got this shit covered in Raiderland

WTF does this mean? You guys sold the damn barn for Carson Palmer

Lex Luthor 01-05-2013 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9283589)
I just want to remind everyone that almost everyone was just about as excited when the Chiefs signed Pioli as they are now.

So what? The two situations are as different as night and day.

Pioli had never run an organization before. It's apparent to everyone now that Pioli was nothing more than Belichick's errand boy, and he was completely unprepared to do the job he was hired to do.

We are excited about this hire because Andy Reid has has already done this, and he's been wildly successful at it. He has proven that he can do this.

The ONLY possible concern would be the 8-8 and 4-12 records of the last two years. I heard a caller on one of the local radio stations say how much that concerned him, and he went on to say that he can't think of a single coach who has gone to another team and been successful after a couple of years like that.

I wanted to yell at the radio and tell that idiot that he obviously doesn't follow the NFL, because I can think of SIX coaches right off the top of my head who got fired after one or more bad seasons with their original teams and then went to different teams and took them (at least) to the playoffs: Bill Belichick, John Fox, Tom Coughlin, Mike Shanahan, Pete Carroll, and our very own Marty Schottenheimer. With the exception of Bellichick, all of those coaches won division titles with their original team before they got fired.

If you're looking for a parallel in Chiefs history, it isn't the hiring of Scott Pioli. It's the hiring of Marty Schottenheimer. Marty never got us to the promised land, but he took us on a helluva ride for 10 years.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 09:32 AM

Clark is cheap smack is soooooo Sunday.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9284549)
WTF does this mean? You guys sold the damn barn for Carson Palmer

You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

mlyonsd 01-05-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284577)
You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

We wouldn't pay him or he, like Manning, wanted no part of the fiasco that were the Pioli Chief's?

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 9284582)
We wouldn't pay him or he, like Manning, wanted no part of the fiasco that were the Pioli Chief's?

Not a chance and you know damn well the Hunts aren't willing to pay the kind of money to bring a FA Like Manning in. It was just a smoke screen to keep you guys in the seats and to make you think he tried... One team held all the cards and cap room for Manning and that was the Chiefs...

Imagine what that 30 million in cap room could have done to replace the shit at QB you have this year?

milkman 01-05-2013 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pro Bowler (Post 9284564)
So what? The two situations are as different as night and day.

Pioli had never run an organization before. It's apparent to everyone now that Pioli was nothing more than Belichick's errand boy, and he was completely unprepared to do the job he was hired to do.

We are excited about this hire because Andy Reid has has already done this, and he's been wildly successful at it. He has proven that he can do this.

The ONLY possible concern would be the 8-8 and 4-12 records of the last two years. I heard a caller on one of the local radio stations say how much that concerned him, and he went on to say that he can't think of a single coach who has gone to another team and been successful after a couple of years like that.

I wanted to yell at the radio and tell that idiot that he obviously doesn't follow the NFL, because I can think of SIX coaches right off the top of my head who got fired after one or more bad seasons with their original teams and then went to different teams and took them (at least) to the playoffs: Bill Belichick, John Fox, Tom Coughlin, Mike Shanahan, Pete Carroll, and our very own Marty Schottenheimer. With the exception of Bellichick, all of those coaches won division titles with their original team before they got fired.

If you're looking for a parallel in Chiefs history, it isn't the hiring of Scott Pioli. It's the hiring of Marty Schottenheimer. Marty never got us to the promised land, but he took us on a helluva ride for 10 years.

10 years with 3 playoff wins, 2 that came in the same season, and no SB to show for it.

10 years closer to death without sniffing a SB.

The fact still remains, regardless of resume's, that the excitement when Scott Pioli was hired, the excitement level was the same.

I am not drawing a parallel of previous records.

I am comparing reactions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284577)
You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

That wasn't about money.

That was Scott Pioli ensuring that Matt Cassel had no real competition.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 09:47 AM

Dude, they just spent like 20 million replacing Varys and hiring Reid. You are going full troll again.

Rausch 01-05-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284577)
You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

We just demoted the GM position to the HC's man-servant.

His job is to do the will of the HC.

And the HC we just hired has no fear of spending money for people he wants. He went out and grabbed every goodie in free agency a few years ago and built the "dream team."

Clark didn't hire this guy to not spend money...

Lex Luthor 01-05-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284577)
You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

Dumbass. That was a Pioli decision, not a Clark Hunt decision. Pioli didn't want Kyle Orton to challenge Matt Cassell for the starting job this year.

Clark Hunt overpaid Pioli, and he just shelled out around $35 million for Andy Reid. That pretty much debunks all of the talk about how cheap people think he is.

chiefzilla1501 01-05-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pro Bowler (Post 9284564)
So what? The two situations are as different as night and day.

Pioli had never run an organization before. It's apparent to everyone now that Pioli was nothing more than Belichick's errand boy, and he was completely unprepared to do the job he was hired to do.

We are excited about this hire because Andy Reid has has already done this, and he's been wildly successful at it. He has proven that he can do this.

The ONLY possible concern would be the 8-8 and 4-12 records of the last two years. I heard a caller on one of the local radio stations say how much that concerned him, and he went on to say that he can't think of a single coach who has gone to another team and been successful after a couple of years like that.

I wanted to yell at the radio and tell that idiot that he obviously doesn't follow the NFL, because I can think of SIX coaches right off the top of my head who got fired after one or more bad seasons with their original teams and then went to different teams and took them (at least) to the playoffs: Bill Belichick, John Fox, Tom Coughlin, Mike Shanahan, Pete Carroll, and our very own Marty Schottenheimer. With the exception of Bellichick, all of those coaches won division titles with their original team before they got fired.

If you're looking for a parallel in Chiefs history, it isn't the hiring of Scott Pioli. It's the hiring of Marty Schottenheimer. Marty never got us to the promised land, but he took us on a helluva ride for 10 years.

You nailed it on your last part. As of right now, he is a very good coach who hasn't proven he can win the big game. And regardless of his playoff win/loss record, anyone in the NFC East can attest that those wins came despite some questionable game management on Reid' part.

The last time around, I trusted Pioli in the same way Hunt did. That was a mistake, and we have to be careful about that. If we repeat history, we'll definitely give him way too much power and we'll extend his contract regardless of how he performs. Like I said before... the DC decision shouldn't be his, he should have say in personnel but hopefully learn to trust his talent evaluators, and in year 5 we have to decide what level of success is acceptable to extend his contract (given the Chiefs' history... they'd be content with "good enough.")

mlyonsd 01-05-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284588)
Not a chance and you know damn well the Hunts aren't willing to pay the kind of money to bring a FA Like Manning in. It was just a smoke screen to keep you guys in the seats and to make you think he tried... One team held all the cards and cap room for Manning and that was the Chiefs...

Imagine what that 30 million in cap room could have done to replace the shit at QB you have this year?

Manning has all the money he needs. He's a competitor that weighed his options. Pioli's chiefs with Romeo and Daboll were probably never much of a consideration to him.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 09:50 AM

Ok, You guys clean off your rose colored glasses and be back here next year when you are 6-10 because El Cheapo Clark wouldn't spend the cash, I am not arguing with you hard heads.

R8RFAN 01-05-2013 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 9284601)
Manning has all the money he needs. He's a competitor that weighed his options. Pioli's chiefs with Romeo and Daboll were probably never much of a consideration to him.

Obviously he doesn't, he risked eating babyfood for the rest of his life to grab the money....


Nobody in the NFL does it for anything except money...

milkman 01-05-2013 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9284594)
We just demoted the GM position to the HC's man-servant.

His job is to do the will of the HC.

And the HC we just hired has no fear of spending money for people he wants. He went out and grabbed every goodie in free agency a few years ago and built the "dream team."

Clark didn't hire this guy to not spend money...

I believe that as team building is concerned, that Scott Pioli had the right approach.

You build championship teams through the draft, and dip into free agency for a couple of key additions when the time is right.

Where Pioli failed is n the actual choices he made in the draft.

The SB hasn't been won by teams that just spend money.

It's won by teams that make good picks in the draft.

Lex Luthor 01-05-2013 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284591)
10 years with 3 playoff wins, 2 that came in the same season, and no SB to show for it.

10 years closer to death without sniffing a SB.

The fact still remains, regardless of resume's, that the excitement when Scott Pioli was hired, the excitement level was the same.

I am not drawing a parallel of previous records.

I am comparing reactions.

I guess I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish here. It sounds like you've decided that nobody should ever get excited about any hire if they've ever been disappointed in the past.

If that's the way you want to look at things, I suppose that's fine for you. I just happen to think that an Andy Reid / John Dorsey combination as head coach and GM is something to get excited about. There's no guarantee that it's going to work out, but even the most pessimistic fan HAS to admit that it's a hell of a lot better combination than Romeo Crennel and Scott Pioli.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284614)
I believe that as team building is concerned, that Scott Pioli had the right approach.

You build championship teams through the draft, and dip into free agency for a couple of key additions when the time is right.

Where Pioli failed is n the actual choices he made in the draft.

The SB hasn't been won by teams that just spend money.

It's won by teams that make good picks in the draft.

Good thing the #1 candidate for our GM job was the director of college scouting for the Packers...

ChiefMojo 01-05-2013 10:02 AM

That was actually one of Reid's downfall in Philly. He was always known to be a head coach that concentrated on the draft but the last few years he dived into the FA market and it didn't work.

Sure there were other issues (death of Johnson, never getting a defensive staff settled afterwards, lack of cohesion in the front office after Heckert left and his family personal issues).

Who knows if Reid will work but at the same time one gets the feeling he stayed in Philly for to long and started going against his original blue print in the end. He gets a new start staff wise and gets to go back to his original blue print again.

milkman 01-05-2013 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pro Bowler (Post 9284621)
I guess I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish here. It sounds like you've decided that nobody should ever get excited about any hire if they've ever been disappointed in the past.

If that's the way you want to look at things, I suppose that's fine for you. I just happen to think that an Andy Reid / John Dorsey combination as head coach and GM is something to get excited about. There's no guarantee that it's going to work out, but even the most pessimistic fan HAS to admit that it's a hell of a lot better combination than Romeo Crennel and Scott Pioli.

I am not excited about Andy Reid as the HC of the Chiefs, the same as I was not excited about Scott Pioli as the GM of the Chiefs when he was hired.

I am not really trying to acomplish anything here, except to show that I am not really on board.

milkman 01-05-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9284630)
Good thing the #1 candidate for our GM job was the director of college scouting for the Packers...

If Dorsey does take the job, then I can buy in a little more.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284640)
I am not excited about Andy Reid as the HC of the Chiefs, the same as I was not excited about Scott Pioli as the GM of the Chiefs when he was hired.

I am not really trying to acomplish anything here, except to show that I am not really on board.

You've never been on board. :)

chiefzilla1501 01-05-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pro Bowler (Post 9284621)
I guess I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish here. It sounds like you've decided that nobody should ever get excited about any hire if they've ever been disappointed in the past.

If that's the way you want to look at things, I suppose that's fine for you. I just happen to think that an Andy Reid / John Dorsey combination as head coach and GM is something to get excited about. There's no guarantee that it's going to work out, but even the most pessimistic fan HAS to admit that it's a hell of a lot better combination than Romeo Crennel and Scott Pioli.

The problem is when fans get over-excited, they let things slide. Just as we, myself not just included (maybe especially), did with Pioli. I'm optimistic about Reid. I'm also not going to kid myself and pretend the red flags aren't there, both in what he did in Philly and what KC might do to coddle him.

WhiteWhale 01-05-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9284638)
That was actually one of Reid's downfall in Philly. He was always known to be a head coach that concentrated on the draft but the last few years he dived into the FA market and it didn't work.

Sure there were other issues (death of Johnson, never getting a defensive staff settled afterwards, lack of cohesion in the front office after Heckert left and his family personal issues).

Who knows if Reid will work but at the same time one gets the feeling he stayed in Philly for to long and started going against his original blue print in the end. He gets a new start staff wise and gets to go back to his original blue print again.

What happened to Reid in philly parallels a LOT of long tenured coaches. Once the 'superbowl or bust' pressure is on after 8 or more years things change.

The coach's core has aged and he has to rebuild, but the fans will not tolerate a rebuild with the same coach. They just won't. Instead he starts trying to 'retool' by grabbing any talent, regardless of baggage, just to fill holes left by his aging stars.

It happened to Marty, and it happened to Fisher. Well, actually Fisher WAS allowed to rebuild... it just failed.

ChiefMojo 01-05-2013 10:07 AM

Who did you want milkman? That isn't a question of disagreement but just curious who you wanted?

Imon Yourside 01-05-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9284655)
Who did you want milkman? That isn't a question of disagreement but just curious who you wanted?

I wanted Kelly but think Reid was probably my 2nd choice.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9284638)
That was actually one of Reid's downfall in Philly. He was always known to be a head coach that concentrated on the draft but the last few years he dived into the FA market and it didn't work.

Sure there were other issues (death of Johnson, never getting a defensive staff settled afterwards, lack of cohesion in the front office after Heckert left and his family personal issues).

Who knows if Reid will work but at the same time one gets the feeling he stayed in Philly for to long and started going against his original blue print in the end. He gets a new start staff wise and gets to go back to his original blue print again.

14 years. Comfort. Myopia.

He gave Juan Castillo the DC job because Castillo wanted to be a coordinator and Andy wanted to do him a favor.

Was it a bad decision? Absolutely.

But it's a decision you make in year 11 or 12 of your tenure, not year 1.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9284654)
What happened to Reid in philly parallels a LOT of long tenured coaches. Once the 'superbowl or bust' pressure is on after 8 or more years things change.

The coach's core has aged and he has to rebuild, but the fans will not tolerate a rebuild with the same coach. They just won't. Instead he starts trying to 'retool' by grabbing any talent, regardless of baggage, just to fill holes left by his aging stars.

It happened to Marty, and it happened to Fisher. Well, actually Fisher WAS allowed to rebuild... it just failed.

THIS.

mlyonsd 01-05-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9284653)
The problem is when fans get over-excited, they let things slide. Just as we, myself not just included (maybe especially), did with Pioli. I'm optimistic about Reid. I'm also not going to kid myself and pretend the red flags aren't there, both in what he did in Philly and what KC might do to coddle him.

From the looks of the QB poll thread if the chiefs don't go after a QB in the 1st round the over-excited expectations will turn into all out rebellion before the first snap of training camp.

There might even be a banner flying around St. Joe.ROFL

Pasta Little Brioni 01-05-2013 10:11 AM

Can't wait to head to other team's boards and read the "Cassel wouldn't be a bad number 2 for the right price. Maybe fill in starter." posts, heh.

milkman 01-05-2013 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9284655)
Who did you want milkman? That isn't a question of disagreement but just curious who you wanted?

I've struggled with this, since the Clark Hunt really limited the choices with the criteria that established.

Before the offseason started, David Shaw was my top choice.

After Hunt described what he was looking for in a HC, Bill Cowher and Brian Billick would have been far more preferable.

And thinking outside the box, I would have looked in the direction of the CFL and talked to Marc Trestman.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284672)
I've struggled with this, since the Clark Hunt really limited the choices with the criteria that established.

Before the offseason started, David Shaw was my top choice.

After Hunt described what he was looking for in a HC, Bill Cowher and Brian Billick would have been far more preferable.

And thinking outside the box, I would have looked in the direction of the CFL and talked to Marc Trestman.

You'd really take Cowher over Reid? Are you feeling OK?

Lex Luthor 01-05-2013 10:22 AM

I guess one thing that makes me happy about hiring Andy Reid is that it almost seems that giving the GM power to the head coach was the only way that Clark Hunt was willing to get rid of that POS Pioli.

If Clark had hired a brand new head coach, he would have had to fire Pioli and hire a brand new GM too. We all know that it's EXACTLY what he should have done, but based upon the way Clark approached the whole thing this week, my fear is that Pioli might have survived if Clark hadn't hired a head coach who could make this decision for him.

Maybe I'm not being fair to Clark Hunt. Maybe if he had hired Chip Kelly or Mike McCoy or Jay Gruden, he would have then fired Pioli and then started looking for a new GM. But letting Reid do the work of finding his own GM certainly made the process easier for Clark and quicker for everyone.

Just think what a fiasco it would have been if Chip Kelly and Scott Pioli were peers next season. Their conflict could have been a replay of the Pioli/Haley conflicts.

The Bad Guy 01-05-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 9284577)
You guys wouldn't even pay KY Orton with a team full of shit, That's the main reason you guys haven't sniffed a SB since ****ing Gatorade was invented. The Hunts are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP, and they will remain CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP.

No, Kyle Orton didn't even give the Chiefs a chance. He bolted for Dallas the minute they told him Cassel was the starter going forward.

Cheap owners don't shell out nearly 2.5 million for Haley to go away, 4 million for Romeo go to away and 15 million for Pioli to go away.

Sorry, the Clark is cheap bullshit is garbage. The Hunt family spent a ton on free agent contracts in the 2000s. He spent a ton of money in 2010 to get Weis and Romeo on staff as well.

Reid is going to cost 40 million. He's hiring a new GM that's going to get at least 3-5 million a year and have to hire a cap guy.

The Bad Guy 01-05-2013 10:26 AM

Brian Billick would have been more preferable?

How?

Brian Billick needs exceptional talent to win. He needs all world players to win. Cunningham was fantastic in Minnesota, he had a stud running back, 2 unreal WRs and a stud slot in Jake Reed.

When he went to Baltimore, he had the greatest defense I've ever seen.

There's also a reason the guy hasn't sniffed a HC job since he was let go from Baltimore over 5 years ago.

WhiteWhale 01-05-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9284677)
You'd really take Cowher over Reid? Are you feeling OK?

Reid is an offensive version of the same coach, but with 1 less superbowl ring.

dirk digler 01-05-2013 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284640)
I am not excited about Andy Reid as the HC of the Chiefs, the same as I was not excited about Scott Pioli as the GM of the Chiefs when he was hired.

I am not really trying to acomplish anything here, except to show that I am not really on board.

Your are not alone with this feeling compadre.

In58men 01-05-2013 11:09 AM

Add this to the OP

http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/01/06/gepubegy.jpg

milkman 01-05-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9284677)
You'd really take Cowher over Reid? Are you feeling OK?

As I've said before, I don't like Reid's approach on offense, the general lack of balance, and the fact that he put the game in the hands of a guy that I always considered highly overrated in McNabb.

I also don't generally like the type of defensive players he targets in the draft.

I'd take Cowher because I believe he could lure Chan Gailey back to KC as OC, and I think Gailey, while not a good HC, is one of the very best offensive minds in the NFL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9284707)
Brian Billick would have been more preferable?

How?

Brian Billick needs exceptional talent to win. He needs all world players to win. Cunningham was fantastic in Minnesota, he had a stud running back, 2 unreal WRs and a stud slot in Jake Reed.

When he went to Baltimore, he had the greatest defense I've ever seen.

There's also a reason the guy hasn't sniffed a HC job since he was let go from Baltimore over 5 years ago.

Brian Billick is a solid administrator, which I believe is critical to success.

Who he brings in assistents would be critical.

Rugby Thompson 01-05-2013 11:14 AM

That pic of Andy and Clark looks like it's from the 1970's, why is this team more secretive then the CIA?

htismaqe 01-05-2013 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9284717)
Reid is an offensive version of the same coach, but with 1 less superbowl ring.

And that one less Super Bowl ring makes him all the more palatable over Cowher. Cowher doesn't even want to coach, let alone have a desire to win a championship.

htismaqe 01-05-2013 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9284777)
I'd take Cowher because I believe he could lure Chan Gailey back to KC as OC, and I think Gailey, while not a good HC, is one of the very best offensive minds in the NFL.

Wow. Who stole the real milkman?

ChiefMojo 01-05-2013 11:18 AM

It is tough to decorate Arrowhead in such short time. Peehole had that place like a mortuary.

Mother****erJones 01-05-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9284707)
Brian Billick would have been more preferable?

How?

Brian Billick needs exceptional talent to win. He needs all world players to win. Cunningham was fantastic in Minnesota, he had a stud running back, 2 unreal WRs and a stud slot in Jake Reed.

When he went to Baltimore, he had the greatest defense I've ever seen.

There's also a reason the guy hasn't sniffed a HC job since he was let go from Baltimore over 5 years ago.

Brian billick won because he had the greatest D of all time! He sucks no thanks. That ass clown athan kept pushing for him


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.