Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12345662)

More talented Bruce Irvin

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 12345647)

Who?

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 12345658)

The guy that will help sweep you

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 12345506)

Thread title made me think he 'broke'
<object data-extension-version="0.4.0.129" data-install-updates-user-configuration="true" id="__symantecPKIClientMessenger" style="display: none;"></object>

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 12345509)

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12345874)

Staylor thinks every player on the team is a future hall of famer, so I'm sure his analysis will be objective.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12345905)

Name one player outside of CAT (who I said could be a good situational pass rusher then some people blew it out of proportion) that I've hyped up that hasn't panned out?

Kelce, Peters, Howard, Gaines, Jones, Murray, Fisher, Nelson, Parker, Morse, March.

Those are the unknowns that I've hyped up to some level or another over the past few years. Some haven't gotten their opportunity, some have had injuries, and some were spot on. I'm right more often than not though.

The problem is, any time I have anything remotely positive to say about a guy that isn't proven, I'm immediately labeled a homer that thinks he's going to be a Pro Bowler/HOF when I never said such a thing.

Take Nelson for example, all offseason I said he could take the nickel spot and be a solid player there, but since he didn't do shit his entire rookie year I was labeled a homer. Here we are now and Nelson currently has the nickel spot and has been impressing ever since OTA's.

What some of you don't realize is that I actually watch these guys a ton going into the draft, and after, so I am not just pulling my takes on them out of my ass. I'm just not scared to evaluate players before I see them in the NFL.

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 12346196)

Dude, COME ON!!! I agree with a lot of your takes, and it's not a knock on your intelligence, but you absolutely 100% are a homer. Now I know that term is usually meant to be an insult, but in this case it isn't meant to be that harsh. It's just pointing out that you see basically everything for KC to be rosy. The refs hate us, or there are 10 excuses for why somebody hasn't panned out.

Every guy is going to reach his potential in your mind and everything is going to go wrong for our rivals. You were ripping SD for taking Bosa saying he wouldn't fit in their scheme. You know that even if he didn't fit in KC's scheme, you absolutely would be singing KC's praises for taking him.

This is what annoys me reading your posts. If you just admitted who you are, it would be so much easier to see the intelligence in your evaluations and not just be sitting here in astonishment that you don't hear yourself. You are a good guy for this board, but just acknowledge what is happening here. Although perhaps you could pat yourself on the back a little less when you are right. If you go find 40 random posts of yours, how many aren't predicting best case scenarios or are pointing out that you were right about something. Hell, the post I just quoted has both of those things, per usual.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12346223)

Shut the **** up.

I don't overrate the Chiefs or any of our players. I use the world "could" instead of "will" when talking about unproven players. I just choose to look at the optimistic side, because there's a lot to be positive about with this regime. If this were the Pioli era, I wouldn't be so optimistic, and I wasn't then.