Jamie |
07-08-2016 03:15 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
(Post 12305136)
I wasn't implying that it changed, only that Marvel was "pressured", for lack of a better term, to perform damage control.
|
You said, "Because of the backlash, that "reveal" lasted about 10 days." I'm saying the reveal would have lasted the exact same amount of time regardless of backlash.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
(Post 12306765)
Why is it lame and uncreative?
I don't read comics but even I know these things happen all the time. For example, the Batman in Batman Beyond wasnt Bruce Wayne and the show was still a cult classic and had very positive reviews.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
Or Dick Greyson as Batman, Wally West as the Flash, Bucky as Captain America...
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
(Post 12306843)
It's lame and uncreative because as smart as they're portraying her to be, IMO, she should have been a new superhero altogether, separate from Tony Stark and Iron Man.
There's no need to have her ride his coattails or assume his mantel.
|
In spite of the success of the movies, comics still don't sell particularly well. Trying to launch new characters without the boost of an existing franchise is a recipe for failure.
So you launch this character in Iron Man, and a year or so down the line Tony Stark comes back and she spins out into her own Iron Girl series. Hopefully she's built enough of a fan base in the main book to stay afloat. I really fail to see why that's such a horrible thing.
|