ChiefsPlanet
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football The Sam Bradford Fiasco in Philadelphia (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299556)

BigBeauford 04-27-2016 03:09 PM
All of this is moot. They have Chase Daniels who will lead them to the promised land.

milkman 04-27-2016 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12197920)
Because you have a fan base that gives you millions of dollars, so you have an obligation to try to put the best man for the job out there.
No it isn't.

Your obligation (should be) as a franchise to build a team that can compete long term.

The best man for that job this year isn't a medicre QB that might make a 2 game difference at best.

It's the guy that can hold down the position while mentoring the investment on the bench.

Red Dawg 04-27-2016 03:12 PM
Bradford is a bust that has been way overly paid. His contract was only for two years even though they gave him a lot.

What makes him think any team wants to make him the man? His stats are shit and his teams have never won more that 7 games. Being way over paid has made him think he's good.

BossChief 04-27-2016 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12197934)
No it isn't.

Your obligation (should be) as a franchise to build a team that can compete long term.

The best man for that job this year isn't a medicre QB that might make a 2 game difference at best.

It's the guy that can hold down the position while mentoring the investment on the bench.
It depends on what team were talking about.

Denver or NY should be trying to get the best QB on the field they can.

Mile High Mania 04-27-2016 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 12197974)
It depends on what team were talking about.

Denver or NY should be trying to get the best QB on the field they can.
No reason for Denver to make a move for him.

oaklandhater 04-27-2016 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12197994)
No reason for Denver to make a move for him.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...n-sam-bradford

Mile High Mania 04-27-2016 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12198001)
Yeah, read that... I'm not surprised they'd 'reach out', you almost have to inquire. They have a more cap friendly guy with more accomplishments in Sanchez, adding Bradford wouldn't make any sense.

King_Chief_Fan 04-27-2016 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 12197994)
No reason for Denver to make a move for him.
Yes...please stay content to have Sanchez. ..he is a winnerROFL....but probably equal to Bradford

Toby Waller 04-27-2016 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12198030)
Yes...please stay content to have Sanchez. ..he is a winnerROFL....but probably equal to Bradford
No,Bradford has actually thrown the ball forward

listopencil 04-27-2016 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12197934)
No it isn't.

Your obligation (should be) as a franchise to build a team that can compete long term.

The best man for that job this year isn't a medicre QB that might make a 2 game difference at best.

It's the guy that can hold down the position while mentoring the investment on the bench.
It looks like that is the situation that Bradford is in right now and he's balking at it. If some team trades for him then he's going to get pissy if he's expected to hold the fort while the QBOTF is brought along.

Mile High Mania 04-27-2016 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 12198030)
Yes...please stay content to have Sanchez. ..he is a winnerROFL....but probably equal to Bradford
Oh... I'm not 'content' with the QB situation. Sanchez sucks and I doubt he'll be the starter for more than 4 games, barring injury. I still kinda think something happens in a trade with SF, but who knows. It's not like that option is too much better than anything else, but I'd roll with Kaep over Sanchez or Bradford.

I just don't see there being a need to have Bradford for that price if you already have Sanchez. Hell, roll with the unknown backup or whatever you draft - no need to take that cap hit with Bradford.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-27-2016 05:10 PM
I remember when some at CP wanted to draft the Llama.

lol

Toby Waller 04-27-2016 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12198134)
I remember when some at CP wanted to draft the Llama.

lol
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hBaUmx5s6iE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Scorp 04-27-2016 06:15 PM
Philly fan reacts....
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/joLjRfk-lfo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bob Dole 04-27-2016 08:35 PM
Bradford is a walking, talking ace bandage.

Always will be.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.