Looks like an almost completely new roster in Jokeland. Should be interesting this season.
|
They just signed 2 of the top 3 CB's on the 49ers roster this past season, can't really say that's a bad thing.
That's gonna be a better team, there's no question. |
The Raiders are better. Yes they added talent, but this offseason is like a handbook in how to spend money just to spend money. Compare what the Raiders did to the Broncos. The Broncos signed pretty young, still in their prime players, that their former team would've loved to keep. I'm trying to think of the player Oakland signed that their former team wasn't like, meh, go ahead, we're fine. Brown maybe?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Raiders HAVE to spend money. They were teetering on having to pay fines for hoarding too much money... |
Quote:
I think at the end of the day they're a better team now than they were at the end of the season. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oakland signed some vets, who still should have a couple good years left, and didnt' break the bank signing them. Oakland looks to have similar cap room next offseason as well. How about the Chiefs? Well, giving a player like Bowe over 11 mill per season is hamstringing your ability to sign players to fill the gaps in your squad. |
Quote:
|
The Raiders had to spend the money... Don't give me the "At least they are trying" bullshit...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My Saints fan coworker just told me the raiders just traded 3 picks for Jimmy Graham?
|
The Raiders are spending money, but that hasn't made the Redskins contenders in the past, nor did it work for the Eagles when they were being called the "dream team" a few years ago.
Talent without coaching and leadership isn't going to take them anywhere, we'll see if they have either of those in quantity. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.