ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football ROMO gets his $$$ (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271586)

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-29-2013 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9538595)
Still not any dumber than giving Joe Flacco as much as he got.

I'm not convinced Flacco's a better QB than Romo.

He is in the playoffs.

AdumbGuy 03-29-2013 02:19 PM

this is just bizarre. I don't watch many Cowboys games so I don't know if the Romo hate is entirely justified, but, but, but did Romo win the superbowl when I wasn't paying attention?

Can any Romo fans (if there are any) justify this?

BigMeatballDave 03-29-2013 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9538595)
Still not any dumber than giving Joe Flacco as much as he got.

I'm not convinced Flacco's a better QB than Romo.

LOL WUT

ChiefsCountry 03-29-2013 02:19 PM

And no Super Bowls for the Cowboys. Awesome.

Dayze 03-29-2013 02:20 PM

the good news here everyone, is we'll get to laugh at his decision at least 5 times this year in prime time games featuring the Cowboys

tk13 03-29-2013 02:23 PM

Jerrah cares bout his team! I wish he owned the Chiefs!
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 03-29-2013 02:23 PM

Hootie should be along soon to tell us how great Romo is. :)

AdumbGuy 03-29-2013 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9538601)
Romo had the Cowboys by the balls on this deal. They have no cap room and ......... this



Dallas Cowboys can’t use franchise tag on QB Tony Romo in 2014, but it doesn’t really matter
By Brandon George / Reporter
bgeorge@dallasnews.com
1:43 pm on March 29, 2013 | Permalink




So the Cowboys can’t place their franchise tag on quarterback Tony Romo in 2014 if the two sides don’t agree to a long-term contract extension. So what.

Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo (9) on the sideline during a game against the Miami Dolphins during the second half of a preseason game at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington on August 29, 2012. The Cowboys defeated the Dolphins 30-13. (Vernon Bryant / DMN)

It’s doesn’t matter. It’s much to do about nothing.

Why?

The NFL Network first reported that Romo’s contract is structured in a way that won’t allow the Cowboys the option of using their franchise tag on him. Romo’s deal still has three years left, and the final two automatically void but not until after the deadline for teams to designate their franchise players.

That means Romo would become an unrestricted free agent next off-season if the current league year ended with no new deal in place.

The Cowboys have pushed back a significant portion of Romo’s money into the voidable years on his contract because they’ve restructured his deal in recent years to free up salary cap space. If the Cowboys were able to use their franchise tag on Romo in 2014, it would come at a cost of more than $26 million for one season.

That just wouldn’t have happened.

So what does all of this really mean? It simply adds a little to the leverage that Romo already had in contract negotiations, but he’s had all the leverage on his side all along.

The Cowboys and Romo will agree on a long-term contract extension this off-season at some point. It will be a deal that favors Romo. There’s no doubt about that. The Cowboys need the deal to get done and want the deal to get done, primarily to free up salary cap space so that they can pursue other free agents this off-season and have the money to sign their six draft picks.

Romo is set to count $16.8 million against the Cowboys’ 2013 salary cap if no extension is done.

A source with knowledge of the Romo-Cowboys negotiations said this week that they’re ongoing and the goal is to get a deal done that is in the best interests of both parties.

But Romo should come out the clear winner.

The biggest reason why the deal will get done is Jerry Jones. He wants the deal done. When was the last time the Cowboys owner let a player leave that he wanted to keep?

And he’s always been one of Romo’s biggest fans. That hasn’t changed, no matter the lack of playoff success.

ok, this makes a little bit more sense. Still, sounds like their GM should be fired....

SPchief 03-29-2013 02:29 PM

Tony Romo!

ThaVirus 03-29-2013 02:29 PM

I'm trying to find any kind of sense that this deal might make and I'm coming up completely dry. Giving a 33 year old QB that's been given as many years and as much talent as he has to take you to the big one even more time is ****ing idiotic on so many levels.

Ah well, it'll be nice watching those Cowboy fans constantly disappointed for the next 6 years.

RyFo18 03-29-2013 02:38 PM

I'd take Romo as a QB over the shit this team has had in a heartbeat. Good for him.

DJ's left nut 03-29-2013 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9538608)
He is in the playoffs.

Denver's safety being a moron didn't suddenly make Joe Flacco a better QB.

The QB travesty of the offseason was paying Joe Flacco like he's one of the top 5 QBs in the NFL when he's nothing more than a good QB that's in the same 2nd tier of QBs with guys like Rivers, Eli Manning and yes, Tony Romo.

The people that swear you can't win a SB without an 'elite' QB have to now call an extremely flawed QB like Joe Flacco elite in order to stay on message. If Denver could manage to play a !@#$ing hail mary correctly, nobody tries to claim that Joe Flacco is a demonstrably better QB than Tony Romo.

There's nothing elite about Joe Flacco. He's not mobile, he's not terribly accurate. For vast swaths of the season he's not even a good decisionmaker.

But he got hot at the right time so now the QB market is blown all to ****.

Ozzie Newsome re-setting the QB market so that every slightly above average QB in the league can now point out that their last 50 career starts compare very favorably to Joe Flacco's is the problem.

Without Flacco's dipshit contract, this contract wouldn't have been nearly as bad. But Ozzie Newsome ****ed up the market.

RyFo18 03-29-2013 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdumbGuy (Post 9538649)
ok, this makes a little bit more sense. Still, sounds like their GM should be fired....

Jerry Jones will never fire himself.

Bump 03-29-2013 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9538595)
Still not any dumber than giving Joe Flacco as much as he got.

I'm not convinced Flacco's a better QB than Romo.

Montana post season and Superbowl MVP. nuff said.

AdumbGuy 03-29-2013 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyFo18 (Post 9538710)
Jerry Jones will never fire himself.

I know, but I stand by my statement


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.