ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football **** you guys saying taking a QB in the first solves everything (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=285918)

Bewbies 08-24-2014 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10846970)
Actually, $78 mil, lol.

I was asking (for the inevitable) 10% senior discount.

Bearcat 08-24-2014 04:07 PM

No one says that.

That sucks.

thabear04 08-24-2014 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 10846966)
Sam Bradford was hurt when they drafted him wasn't he? LMAO

$70,000,000 for a broke dick, pricey....

Think it was his ankle.

DeezNutz 08-24-2014 04:08 PM

I hear you. I was screaming for the Rams to take a high-upside yet safe pick like Jason Smith. Dude was a ****ing stud in college.

Oh, shit...

Rams Fan 08-24-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10846960)
It's always a surprise when dumbasses don't understand the argument.

I understand the argument. Prior to Bradford, the Rams hadn't drafted a QB in the 1st since 1960.

I'd rather take a QB from the 2nd round on, every ****ing draft, until a "franchise" QB is found as to make the cap manageable then pinning the hopes onto one drafted 1st overall(who had a large salary due to the previous CBA, mind you) while building around him.

Fritz88 08-24-2014 04:09 PM

That's the NFL.

milkman 08-24-2014 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 10846987)
I understand the argument. Prior to Bradford, the Rams hadn't drafted a QB in the 1st since 1960.

I'd rather take a QB from the 2nd round on, every ****ing draft, until a "franchise" QB is found as to make the cap manageable then pinning the hopes onto one drafted 1st overall(who had a large salary due to the previous CBA, mind you) while building around him.

The argument has never been that all of your problems are solved when taking a first round QB.

The argument is that your best chance at finding an elite QB, a franchise QB, is taking a QB in the first round.

I have no problem with your plan.
You are almost certainly going to hit on one eventually.

Ming the Merciless 08-24-2014 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thabear04 (Post 10846952)
Is he still with the bills.

he ripped his hammy real bad apparently


not sure whats up with him

OldSchool 08-24-2014 04:14 PM

RG3 looks like crap now too, lol. He has been pretty bad since his return from the injury.

jonzie04 08-24-2014 04:15 PM

Chiefs are failing due to sucking in the draft. We have only had like 3 good draft picks since 200****ing8

Rams Fan 08-24-2014 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10846994)
The argument has never been that all of your problems are solved when taking a first round QB.

The argument is that your best chance at finding an elite QB, a franchise QB, is taking a QB in the first round.

I have no problem with your plan.
You are almost certainly going to hit on one eventually.

Honestly, that's my largest problem with Fisher at the moment. He brought in a vet backup that's better than Clemens, fine. However, I don't understand why not to draft a QB in the 2nd or 3rd, especially considering that Hill won't be around forever and if Bradford would have stayed healthy for a long period of time, he'd still need someone to hold the clipboard, so why not draft someone with more potential than Garrett ****ing Gilbert?

Deberg_1990 08-24-2014 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10846994)
The argument has never been that all of your problems are solved when taking a first round QB.

The argument is that your best chance at finding an elite QB, a franchise QB, is taking a QB in the first round.

I have no problem with your plan.
You are almost certainly going to hit on one eventually.

I completely understand the argument.
On the flip flop, there are plenty of others ways to skin a cat. We just had a Super Bowl winner with a 3rd rounder.


The Rams did the right thing. Just a victim of bad luck.

32 teams out of 32 teams would have taken Bradford in that same position.

OldSchool 08-24-2014 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10847012)
I completely understand the argument.
On the flip flop, there are plenty of others ways to skin a cat. We just had a Super Bowl winner with a 3rd rounder.


The Rams did the right thing. Just a victim of bad luck.

32 teams out of 32 teams would have taken Bradford in that same position.

Nah, I would have taken Suh, the most dominant player in college football in 2010. Bradford was very "meh" to me.

milkman 08-24-2014 04:28 PM

My problem with ths Chiefs approach isn't that they haven't taken a first round QB, it's that they have only committed to a young QB with potential in 30 years.

KcMizzou 08-24-2014 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10847012)
I completely understand the argument.
On the flip flop, there are plenty of others ways to skin a cat. We just had a Super Bowl winner with a 3rd rounder.


The Rams did the right thing. Just a victim of bad luck.

32 teams out of 32 teams would have taken Bradford in that same position.

Really? I watched Bradford all through college, and he never struck me as an elite QB talent.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.