/facepalm.jpg

You're so ignorant sometimes.
If Stanzi were in this draft, he'd be a first round selection, that's how bad this draft is for QB's, they are all career backup caliber, but a few will likely become starters for a few years at some point, while teams wait on the next crop of QB's. Just like how Blaine Gabbert's situation sits. The guy blows donkey dick, yet he's a starter.

Believe it or not, teams, coaches, talent evaluators, etc. can change their minds. They can, you know, setup meetings with players (like Geno) after they announce they've narrowed it down.

Its all a rouse to drive trade pricing and trade requests anyhow.

Truthfully, we won't know until he plays. But you can't sit here and say Geno NOW, is as good as Garcia ever was, or is better than Kolb (now). As for McNabb, you can't bring up Eagles QB's that Reid has coached, and NOT talk about McNabb. That's just dumb.

You don't get to count Brees, and 7 out of 13 is 1 away from LESS than half.

So while you might to try qualify your argument's verbage to make it sound like that is a lot, in a statistical sense, its almost as likely that you'll win a super bowl with a QB not picked in the first round.


I stand 110% behind what the new Regime does, but I KNOW the knew Regime will NOT be picking Geno Smith.

It simply will not happen, period, end of story.

So I'm trying to help these idiots along who think that Geno will be our pick at the 1.1 understand the impossibility of Geno being selected.

Why?

Why?

Nobody, you kidding me?
Well in the hundreds on this forum.

"You're the ignorant one" he says LMAO

The basic premise of Ignorant, is to Ignore.

Its safe to say that I don't ignore a single fact, I work through them logically until a solution is given. That's how speculation works.

Believe it or not, you don't have to throw shit at a wall to see if it sticks. :thumb:

There's no speculation involved at all right now. You're ADDING speculation to something that shouldn't be so ****ing complicated.

JustPassinBy posted something stupid. You liked it. I said it was dumb, you said "Prove it." I did. And then you posted entire novels of bullshit that doesn't matter or disprove my claim.

I don't want to go to some random website to view an image, learn how to post images here.

PS link is messed up :P
I"m not adding to anything, I'm trying to guide the general cluster **** into a logical conclusion by taking away speculations.

As far as your analysis of JustPassinBy, you are dead ****ing wrong, and you didn't prove anything.

He made a comment that hit the nail directly on the head, which is you don't take a QB #1 overall JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T DONE IT IN FOREVER. His retort, is that we haven't thrown away and forfeited every pick we have too.

The premise being, in this league you don't devalue picks and throw them away. You don't make decisions in this league based on voodoo rituals and superstitions, you make your selections or trades based upon valued evaluations upon needs and wants with any given player.

I'm sorry that you're too stupid to realize that in this league, you're not supposed to throw away picks "just because" and you don't draft a QB #1 overall because you've got the pick to do it, you make that selection because he's actually worth it.

In this draft, where there's equal talent available int he 2nd round, possibly even the 3rd, you don't draft Geno Smith overall while you have Alex Smith on your roster, costing you two second round picks.

That's logic.

I'm sorry you don't have the mental capacity to see the big picture.:thumb:

That's not what he was saying at all.

When you call someone out on reading comprehension, it's always helpful to double-check to make sure you're not the ****ing moron.

And now I know it is true, you're a moron.


What exactly did you THINK he was saying when he made that comment about us not throwing away all of our picks?

And please don't' try to foolishly compare it again to "If your friend told you to jump off a bridge, would you?", because the comprehension here is positing an antithesis to your statement.

Whereas your retort of it being akin to jumping off a bridge is not an antithesis, and does NOT match up to the comment he made in parallel to yours.

Stupid shit.

I guess we need Jasonsauto to put Exoter in his place again.

Sauto has never in his life put me in my place lol.


You're talking about the same guy who called me an, and I quote, "An overeducated knowitall with your diplomas and certs" like it was a bad thing.

Or the same guy who cried like a baby when I said I wanted to meet him so I could slap the **** out of him because he got mad in a thread and started talking shit about where I live.

Sauto's a piece of dirt.

Men slapping men. That would be fun.

That's not what I said. And, since you linked to it without actually quoting it after this, let's get the actual quote:

Not only did I not say "maybe you should try doing that", I noted that you would, of course, not recommend such an action be taken. In other words, you took the entire point of my post and tried to twist it into exactly the opposite of what I was saying.

Just quoting this to point out that SNR was wrong, after he called me out on Reading Comprehension. :thumb:

I want to buy you a beer!

You ****ing suck.

A mother never suggests that her child should jump off a bridge if all the friends do it.

I know you weren't advocating that we vacate all of our draft selections.

For ****'s sake.

Do you have kids?:spock: