Dorsey just cheesed out on the radio when Kevin K asked about drafting a QB.

Never say never

I never stated they were imbeciles. However, if you are using the Redskins as your template, I can only think of three or four franchises who have done worse than they have in off season acquisitions as compared to expected results since Daniel Snyder has purchased the team.

I am not saying having two good QBs is a bad thing. I am saying the Chiefs are not going to use their #1 to get another QB after just acquiring their starter. They will want an immediate impact player for the number one pick of the draft - it will be expected.

Is it the right thing? I don't know. I know it is speculation to assume that Geno is a starter and an immediate impact player - too much speculation for the Chiefs front office. It simply won't happen.

Rodgers was a 24th pick. An amazing thing considering many picked him as a #1 prior to the combine. And I agree with you, I don't think he would be this smart without the two years of the bench.

But the average fan doesn't want the overall #1 to sit on a bench for 2 years, it doesn't make sense to them. Thus it won't make sense to the front office.

Exactly. The QB position has become so important in today's game, that it's impossible to have too much talent at that position. Look at the teams you named, and how those teams can approach their respective drafts knowing their QB position is more than set.

It's a completely different game than when those guys were playing.

It's always "Different". Yet it still remains the same at the end of the season.

For example: Every 7 or 8 years we are told how important the "new" mobile quarterback is to the game. And after two or three seasons of major injuries and pocket passers winning the big game, it goes back to the same routine. Staubach is the only true mobile QB to win a Superbowl (although an argument could be made for Steve Young).

I am curious though, A question for you and those that do support bringing in Geno Smith, do you then believe Joe Flacco deserves his contract? After all, he is the epitome of "Throwing every resource" at the QB position, isn't he?

Just to clarify, since you keep saying it in other posts, our pick we supposedly gave up is in the second round. Not the first. It's the second second round pick that doesn't make it a first.

Ok that's out of the way.

Now last year the redskins gave up their first, a second, two later firsts and a fourth for two quarterbacks.

They went to the playoffs playing in the same division as Andy Reid. He played that shitty teamtwice a year for quite see time and then saw first hand what spending those picks did for them.



Why is it so far fetched to think he would spend a first and two seconds for two guys?
Posted via Mobile Device

Thank you
Posted via Mobile Device

Hell Brett farve and Matt hasselbeck, neither could be good by that thinking.


Farve and brunell, farve and Aaron Brooks.


now guess where our GM worked when all those combos of two starting caliber qb's where put together...
Posted via Mobile Device

is the argument over young that he didn't win one or that he wasn't mobile?


Either one makes as much sense as the other
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh and **** yeah flacco deserves his contract
Posted via Mobile Device

keep the dream alive


more power to ya

What year did farve go there?

They drafted hasselbeck in 94 iirc.

Brunell in 98

Brooks in 99

All iirc, could be a year off on one or two but I think it shot your argument all to shit anyway
Posted via Mobile Device

Dude, are you ok?


Did you fall down anytime recently?


bump your head?



Surely you don't think that if it doesn't make sense to fans it won't make sense to the front office.


Please tell me you are kidding
Posted via Mobile Device

Name the immediate impact player in this draft
Posted via Mobile Device